Natural Gas Services Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Natural Gas Services Group Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Natural Gas Services Group Inc (NGS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $23.04 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($308.38 Million) in one year. Check Natural Gas Services Group Inc (NGS) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Natural Gas Services Group Inc (2001–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Natural Gas Services Group Inc from 2001 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Natural Gas Services Group Inc across 25 annual periods. Check Natural Gas Services Group Inc cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Natural Gas Services Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2025)
Natural Gas Services Group Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Natural Gas Services Group Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Natural Gas Services Group Inc (NGS) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | $62.93 Million | $312.07 Million | ▼ -26.9% |
| 2024 | 0.28x | $65.50 Million | $237.47 Million | ▲ +271.4% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | $18.03 Million | $242.84 Million | ▼ -73.7% |
| 2022 | 0.28x | $27.76 Million | $98.17 Million | ▼ -29.4% |
| 2021 | 0.40x | $28.29 Million | $70.58 Million | ▼ -32.2% |
| 2020 | 0.59x | $32.65 Million | $55.26 Million | ▼ -21.9% |
| 2019 | 0.76x | $29.41 Million | $38.88 Million | ▲ +46.1% |
| 2018 | 0.52x | $23.41 Million | $45.22 Million | ▲ +21.6% |
| 2017 | 0.43x | $17.45 Million | $40.99 Million | ▼ -21.3% |
| 2016 | 0.54x | $32.77 Million | $60.57 Million | ▼ -19.9% |
| 2015 | 0.68x | $41.61 Million | $61.57 Million | ▲ +42.7% |
| 2014 | 0.47x | $34.56 Million | $72.98 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2013 | 0.61x | $39.24 Million | $63.85 Million | ▼ -1.2% |
| 2012 | 0.62x | $35.42 Million | $56.93 Million | ▼ -6.3% |
| 2011 | 0.66x | $33.62 Million | $50.62 Million | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2010 | 0.75x | $28.80 Million | $38.18 Million | ▲ +5.0% |
| 2009 | 0.72x | $32.18 Million | $44.77 Million | ▲ +28.7% |
| 2008 | 0.56x | $28.25 Million | $50.60 Million | ▲ +18.7% |
| 2007 | 0.47x | $18.27 Million | $38.85 Million | ▲ +36.4% |
| 2006 | 0.34x | $11.84 Million | $34.35 Million | ▲ +270.2% |
| 2005 | 0.09x | $3.79 Million | $40.68 Million | ▼ -59.6% |
| 2004 | 0.23x | $4.70 Million | $20.35 Million | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2003 | 0.22x | $3.02 Million | $13.85 Million | ▲ +8.3% |
| 2002 | 0.20x | $2.21 Million | $10.94 Million | ▲ +213.0% |
| 2001 | 0.06x | $839.75K | $13.03 Million | — |