Northwest Natural Gas Co (NWN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Northwest Natural Gas Co (NWN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $116.13 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($4.84 Billion) in one year. See how financially flexible is Northwest Natural Gas Co to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Northwest Natural Gas Co Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Northwest Natural Gas Co across 32 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see NWN cash flow metrics.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Northwest Natural Gas Co (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Northwest Natural Gas Co. Check cash flow quality index of Northwest Natural Gas Co to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.06x | $269.12 Million | $4.76 Billion | ▲ +8.6% |
| 2024 | 0.05x | $200.28 Million | $3.85 Billion | ▼ -33.4% |
| 2023 | 0.08x | $279.95 Million | $3.58 Billion | ▲ +89.0% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | $147.67 Million | $3.57 Billion | ▼ -19.3% |
| 2021 | 0.05x | $160.35 Million | $3.13 Billion | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $143.02 Million | $2.87 Billion | ▼ -29.5% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $185.30 Million | $2.62 Billion | ▲ +3.9% |
| 2018 | 0.07x | $168.77 Million | $2.48 Billion | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2017 | 0.09x | $206.70 Million | $2.30 Billion | ▼ -9.7% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | $222.15 Million | $2.23 Billion | ▲ +23.9% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | $184.69 Million | $2.30 Billion | ▼ -14.3% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $215.66 Million | $2.30 Billion | ▲ +18.1% |
| 2013 | 0.08x | $176.39 Million | $2.22 Billion | ▼ -1.8% |
| 2012 | 0.08x | $168.84 Million | $2.09 Billion | ▼ -29.5% |
| 2011 | 0.11x | $233.46 Million | $2.03 Billion | ▲ +74.7% |
| 2010 | 0.07x | $126.47 Million | $1.92 Billion | ▼ -68.9% |
| 2009 | 0.21x | $240.34 Million | $1.14 Billion | ▲ +964.8% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $34.72 Million | $1.75 Billion | ▼ -84.7% |
| 2007 | 0.13x | $183.64 Million | $1.42 Billion | ▲ +18.2% |
| 2006 | 0.11x | $148.57 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▲ +101.4% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | $79.07 Million | $1.46 Billion | ▼ -41.3% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | $107.74 Million | $1.16 Billion | ▼ -5.9% |
| 2003 | 0.10x | $106.81 Million | $1.09 Billion | ▼ -32.3% |
| 2002 | 0.15x | $123.83 Million | $851.44 Million | ▲ +89.7% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $71.52 Million | $932.86 Million | ▼ -30.4% |
| 2000 | 0.11x | $87.24 Million | $791.65 Million | ▼ -20.9% |
| 1999 | 0.14x | $108.50 Million | $779.20 Million | ▲ +51.2% |
| 1998 | 0.09x | $66.90 Million | $726.50 Million | ▲ +42.3% |
| 1997 | 0.06x | $45.80 Million | $707.90 Million | ▼ -56.6% |
| 1996 | 0.15x | $89.90 Million | $603.40 Million | ▲ +0.5% |
| 1995 | 0.15x | $83.90 Million | $565.90 Million | ▼ -22.8% |
| 1994 | 0.19x | $110.00 Million | $572.60 Million | — |