Onto Innovation Inc (ONTO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Onto Innovation Inc (ONTO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $26.32 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($264.18 Million) in one year. See Onto Innovation Inc (ONTO) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Onto Innovation Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Onto Innovation Inc across 31 annual periods. Also explore how fast is Onto Innovation Inc growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Onto Innovation Inc (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Onto Innovation Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Onto Innovation Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.23x | $328.31 Million | $267.09 Million | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2024 | 1.28x | $245.68 Million | $191.21 Million | ▲ +29.4% |
| 2023 | 0.99x | $171.97 Million | $173.18 Million | ▲ +44.2% |
| 2022 | 0.69x | $136.70 Million | $198.44 Million | ▼ -12.1% |
| 2021 | 0.78x | $175.28 Million | $223.76 Million | ▲ +50.4% |
| 2020 | 0.52x | $105.98 Million | $203.43 Million | ▲ +429.9% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | $18.15 Million | $184.55 Million | ▼ -84.3% |
| 2018 | 0.62x | $35.09 Million | $56.15 Million | ▼ -48.8% |
| 2017 | 1.22x | $64.37 Million | $52.77 Million | ▲ +17.6% |
| 2016 | 1.04x | $46.63 Million | $44.96 Million | ▲ +235.0% |
| 2015 | 0.31x | $33.79 Million | $109.15 Million | ▲ +616.7% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | $4.29 Million | $99.31 Million | ▼ -34.4% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | $6.08 Million | $92.36 Million | ▼ -71.4% |
| 2012 | 0.23x | $22.07 Million | $95.89 Million | ▼ -57.4% |
| 2011 | 0.54x | $45.44 Million | $84.13 Million | ▲ +12.6% |
| 2010 | 0.48x | $16.32 Million | $34.02 Million | ▲ +207.7% |
| 2009 | -0.45x | $-12.06 Million | $27.07 Million | ▼ -161.8% |
| 2008 | 0.72x | $15.39 Million | $21.34 Million | ▲ +9.3% |
| 2007 | 0.66x | $23.58 Million | $35.74 Million | ▲ +52.2% |
| 2006 | 0.43x | $20.64 Million | $47.61 Million | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2005 | 0.52x | $8.08 Million | $15.47 Million | ▲ +336.8% |
| 2004 | -0.22x | $-3.20 Million | $14.51 Million | ▼ -139.3% |
| 2003 | 0.56x | $6.65 Million | $11.83 Million | ▲ +648.1% |
| 2002 | 0.08x | $1.34 Million | $17.88 Million | ▼ -98.2% |
| 2001 | 4.06x | $22.96 Million | $5.65 Million | ▲ +1422.1% |
| 2000 | -0.31x | $-4.63 Million | $15.05 Million | ▼ -220.6% |
| 1999 | -0.10x | $-700.00K | $7.30 Million | ▲ +42.6% |
| 1998 | -0.17x | $-6.90 Million | $41.30 Million | ▼ -130.6% |
| 1997 | 0.55x | $4.20 Million | $7.70 Million | ▲ +977.3% |
| 1996 | 0.05x | $400.00K | $7.90 Million | ▼ -83.3% |
| 1995 | 0.30x | $2.30 Million | $7.60 Million | — |