Onto Innovation Inc (ONTO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Onto Innovation Inc (ONTO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $26.32 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($264.18 Million) in one year. Explore ONTO long-term asset investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Onto Innovation Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Onto Innovation Inc across 31 annual periods. Also explore Onto Innovation Inc assets under control for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Onto Innovation Inc (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Onto Innovation Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Onto Innovation Inc worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.23x | $328.31 Million | $267.09 Million | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2024 | 1.28x | $245.68 Million | $191.21 Million | ▲ +29.4% |
| 2023 | 0.99x | $171.97 Million | $173.18 Million | ▲ +44.2% |
| 2022 | 0.69x | $136.70 Million | $198.44 Million | ▼ -12.1% |
| 2021 | 0.78x | $175.28 Million | $223.76 Million | ▲ +50.4% |
| 2020 | 0.52x | $105.98 Million | $203.43 Million | ▲ +429.9% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | $18.15 Million | $184.55 Million | ▼ -84.3% |
| 2018 | 0.62x | $35.09 Million | $56.15 Million | ▼ -48.8% |
| 2017 | 1.22x | $64.37 Million | $52.77 Million | ▲ +17.6% |
| 2016 | 1.04x | $46.63 Million | $44.96 Million | ▲ +235.0% |
| 2015 | 0.31x | $33.79 Million | $109.15 Million | ▲ +616.7% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | $4.29 Million | $99.31 Million | ▼ -34.4% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | $6.08 Million | $92.36 Million | ▼ -71.4% |
| 2012 | 0.23x | $22.07 Million | $95.89 Million | ▼ -57.4% |
| 2011 | 0.54x | $45.44 Million | $84.13 Million | ▲ +12.6% |
| 2010 | 0.48x | $16.32 Million | $34.02 Million | ▲ +207.7% |
| 2009 | -0.45x | $-12.06 Million | $27.07 Million | ▼ -161.8% |
| 2008 | 0.72x | $15.39 Million | $21.34 Million | ▲ +9.3% |
| 2007 | 0.66x | $23.58 Million | $35.74 Million | ▲ +52.2% |
| 2006 | 0.43x | $20.64 Million | $47.61 Million | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2005 | 0.52x | $8.08 Million | $15.47 Million | ▲ +336.8% |
| 2004 | -0.22x | $-3.20 Million | $14.51 Million | ▼ -139.3% |
| 2003 | 0.56x | $6.65 Million | $11.83 Million | ▲ +648.1% |
| 2002 | 0.08x | $1.34 Million | $17.88 Million | ▼ -98.2% |
| 2001 | 4.06x | $22.96 Million | $5.65 Million | ▲ +1422.1% |
| 2000 | -0.31x | $-4.63 Million | $15.05 Million | ▼ -220.6% |
| 1999 | -0.10x | $-700.00K | $7.30 Million | ▲ +42.6% |
| 1998 | -0.17x | $-6.90 Million | $41.30 Million | ▼ -130.6% |
| 1997 | 0.55x | $4.20 Million | $7.70 Million | ▲ +977.3% |
| 1996 | 0.05x | $400.00K | $7.90 Million | ▼ -83.3% |
| 1995 | 0.30x | $2.30 Million | $7.60 Million | — |