Onto Innovation Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Onto Innovation Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Onto Innovation Inc (ONTO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $26.32 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($264.18 Million) in one year. Check Onto Innovation Inc earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Onto Innovation Inc (1995–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Onto Innovation Inc from 1995 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Onto Innovation Inc across 31 annual periods. Check Onto Innovation Inc (ONTO) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Onto Innovation Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2025)
Onto Innovation Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Onto Innovation Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Onto Innovation Inc (ONTO) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.23x | $328.31 Million | $267.09 Million | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2024 | 1.28x | $245.68 Million | $191.21 Million | ▲ +29.4% |
| 2023 | 0.99x | $171.97 Million | $173.18 Million | ▲ +44.2% |
| 2022 | 0.69x | $136.70 Million | $198.44 Million | ▼ -12.1% |
| 2021 | 0.78x | $175.28 Million | $223.76 Million | ▲ +50.4% |
| 2020 | 0.52x | $105.98 Million | $203.43 Million | ▲ +429.9% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | $18.15 Million | $184.55 Million | ▼ -84.3% |
| 2018 | 0.62x | $35.09 Million | $56.15 Million | ▼ -48.8% |
| 2017 | 1.22x | $64.37 Million | $52.77 Million | ▲ +17.6% |
| 2016 | 1.04x | $46.63 Million | $44.96 Million | ▲ +235.0% |
| 2015 | 0.31x | $33.79 Million | $109.15 Million | ▲ +616.7% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | $4.29 Million | $99.31 Million | ▼ -34.4% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | $6.08 Million | $92.36 Million | ▼ -71.4% |
| 2012 | 0.23x | $22.07 Million | $95.89 Million | ▼ -57.4% |
| 2011 | 0.54x | $45.44 Million | $84.13 Million | ▲ +12.6% |
| 2010 | 0.48x | $16.32 Million | $34.02 Million | ▲ +207.7% |
| 2009 | -0.45x | $-12.06 Million | $27.07 Million | ▼ -161.8% |
| 2008 | 0.72x | $15.39 Million | $21.34 Million | ▲ +9.3% |
| 2007 | 0.66x | $23.58 Million | $35.74 Million | ▲ +52.2% |
| 2006 | 0.43x | $20.64 Million | $47.61 Million | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2005 | 0.52x | $8.08 Million | $15.47 Million | ▲ +336.8% |
| 2004 | -0.22x | $-3.20 Million | $14.51 Million | ▼ -139.3% |
| 2003 | 0.56x | $6.65 Million | $11.83 Million | ▲ +648.1% |
| 2002 | 0.08x | $1.34 Million | $17.88 Million | ▼ -98.2% |
| 2001 | 4.06x | $22.96 Million | $5.65 Million | ▲ +1422.1% |
| 2000 | -0.31x | $-4.63 Million | $15.05 Million | ▼ -220.6% |
| 1999 | -0.10x | $-700.00K | $7.30 Million | ▲ +42.6% |
| 1998 | -0.17x | $-6.90 Million | $41.30 Million | ▼ -130.6% |
| 1997 | 0.55x | $4.20 Million | $7.70 Million | ▲ +977.3% |
| 1996 | 0.05x | $400.00K | $7.90 Million | ▼ -83.3% |
| 1995 | 0.30x | $2.30 Million | $7.60 Million | — |