Oppenheimer Holdings Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Oppenheimer Holdings Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Oppenheimer Holdings Inc (OPY) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $63.42 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.90 Billion) in one year. Check Oppenheimer Holdings Inc cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Oppenheimer Holdings Inc (1991–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Oppenheimer Holdings Inc from 1991 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Oppenheimer Holdings Inc across 31 annual periods. Check Oppenheimer Holdings Inc investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Oppenheimer Holdings Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1991–2024)
Oppenheimer Holdings Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1991 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Oppenheimer Holdings Inc cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.04x | $-108.17 Million | $2.53 Billion | ▼ -373.6% |
| 2023 | -0.01x | $-18.81 Million | $2.09 Billion | ▼ -126.5% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $64.49 Million | $1.89 Billion | ▼ -68.8% |
| 2021 | 0.11x | $227.79 Million | $2.09 Billion | ▲ +508.9% |
| 2020 | -0.03x | $-54.06 Million | $2.03 Billion | ▼ -163.0% |
| 2019 | 0.04x | $79.14 Million | $1.87 Billion | ▼ -57.5% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $168.57 Million | $1.69 Billion | ▲ +1280.0% |
| 2017 | -0.01x | $-16.14 Million | $1.91 Billion | ▲ +78.3% |
| 2016 | -0.04x | $-66.86 Million | $1.72 Billion | ▼ -333.2% |
| 2015 | -0.01x | $-19.41 Million | $2.17 Billion | ▼ -125.8% |
| 2014 | 0.03x | $78.31 Million | $2.25 Billion | ▲ +2557.3% |
| 2013 | 0.00x | $-3.43 Million | $2.42 Billion | ▲ +67.5% |
| 2012 | 0.00x | $-9.45 Million | $2.17 Billion | ▼ -116.1% |
| 2011 | 0.03x | $81.54 Million | $3.01 Billion | ▲ +141.8% |
| 2010 | -0.06x | $-137.28 Million | $2.12 Billion | ▼ -307.1% |
| 2009 | 0.03x | $54.72 Million | $1.75 Billion | ▼ -42.3% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | $59.76 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▼ -19.3% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | $113.67 Million | $1.69 Billion | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2006 | 0.06x | $114.30 Million | $1.80 Billion | ▲ +232.7% |
| 2005 | -0.05x | $-89.73 Million | $1.88 Billion | ▼ -158.6% |
| 2004 | 0.08x | $121.99 Million | $1.49 Billion | ▲ +305.7% |
| 2003 | -0.04x | $-56.69 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▼ -845.7% |
| 2002 | 0.00x | $-3.24 Million | $771.93 Million | ▼ -108.6% |
| 2001 | 0.05x | $22.34 Million | $458.17 Million | ▼ -60.0% |
| 2000 | 0.12x | $53.57 Million | $439.05 Million | ▲ +496.2% |
| 1999 | -0.03x | $-14.50 Million | $470.80 Million | ▼ -89.8% |
| 1998 | -0.02x | $-8.12 Million | $500.44 Million | ▼ -115.1% |
| 1997 | 0.11x | $72.49 Million | $674.21 Million | ▲ +29.6% |
| 1996 | 0.08x | $31.86 Million | $384.04 Million | ▲ +1173.2% |
| 1995 | -0.01x | $-3.99 Million | $516.06 Million | ▲ +99.9% |
| 1991 | -5.32x | $-11.70 Million | $2.20 Million | — |