Oppenheimer Holdings Inc (OPY) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Oppenheimer Holdings Inc (OPY) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $63.42 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.90 Billion) in one year. See Oppenheimer Holdings Inc free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Oppenheimer Holdings Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Oppenheimer Holdings Inc across 31 annual periods. Also explore Oppenheimer Holdings Inc (OPY) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Oppenheimer Holdings Inc (1991–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see OPY market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.04x | $-108.17 Million | $2.53 Billion | ▼ -373.6% |
| 2023 | -0.01x | $-18.81 Million | $2.09 Billion | ▼ -126.5% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $64.49 Million | $1.89 Billion | ▼ -68.8% |
| 2021 | 0.11x | $227.79 Million | $2.09 Billion | ▲ +508.9% |
| 2020 | -0.03x | $-54.06 Million | $2.03 Billion | ▼ -163.0% |
| 2019 | 0.04x | $79.14 Million | $1.87 Billion | ▼ -57.5% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $168.57 Million | $1.69 Billion | ▲ +1280.0% |
| 2017 | -0.01x | $-16.14 Million | $1.91 Billion | ▲ +78.3% |
| 2016 | -0.04x | $-66.86 Million | $1.72 Billion | ▼ -333.2% |
| 2015 | -0.01x | $-19.41 Million | $2.17 Billion | ▼ -125.8% |
| 2014 | 0.03x | $78.31 Million | $2.25 Billion | ▲ +2557.3% |
| 2013 | 0.00x | $-3.43 Million | $2.42 Billion | ▲ +67.5% |
| 2012 | 0.00x | $-9.45 Million | $2.17 Billion | ▼ -116.1% |
| 2011 | 0.03x | $81.54 Million | $3.01 Billion | ▲ +141.8% |
| 2010 | -0.06x | $-137.28 Million | $2.12 Billion | ▼ -307.1% |
| 2009 | 0.03x | $54.72 Million | $1.75 Billion | ▼ -42.3% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | $59.76 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▼ -19.3% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | $113.67 Million | $1.69 Billion | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2006 | 0.06x | $114.30 Million | $1.80 Billion | ▲ +232.7% |
| 2005 | -0.05x | $-89.73 Million | $1.88 Billion | ▼ -158.6% |
| 2004 | 0.08x | $121.99 Million | $1.49 Billion | ▲ +305.7% |
| 2003 | -0.04x | $-56.69 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▼ -845.7% |
| 2002 | 0.00x | $-3.24 Million | $771.93 Million | ▼ -108.6% |
| 2001 | 0.05x | $22.34 Million | $458.17 Million | ▼ -60.0% |
| 2000 | 0.12x | $53.57 Million | $439.05 Million | ▲ +496.2% |
| 1999 | -0.03x | $-14.50 Million | $470.80 Million | ▼ -89.8% |
| 1998 | -0.02x | $-8.12 Million | $500.44 Million | ▼ -115.1% |
| 1997 | 0.11x | $72.49 Million | $674.21 Million | ▲ +29.6% |
| 1996 | 0.08x | $31.86 Million | $384.04 Million | ▲ +1173.2% |
| 1995 | -0.01x | $-3.99 Million | $516.06 Million | ▲ +99.9% |
| 1991 | -5.32x | $-11.70 Million | $2.20 Million | — |