Oppenheimer Holdings Inc (OPY) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Oppenheimer Holdings Inc (OPY) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $63.42 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.90 Billion) in one year. Explore investment intensity of Oppenheimer Holdings Inc to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Oppenheimer Holdings Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Oppenheimer Holdings Inc across 31 annual periods. Also explore total assets of Oppenheimer Holdings Inc for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Oppenheimer Holdings Inc (1991–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see OPY company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.04x | $-108.17 Million | $2.53 Billion | ▼ -373.6% |
| 2023 | -0.01x | $-18.81 Million | $2.09 Billion | ▼ -126.5% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $64.49 Million | $1.89 Billion | ▼ -68.8% |
| 2021 | 0.11x | $227.79 Million | $2.09 Billion | ▲ +508.9% |
| 2020 | -0.03x | $-54.06 Million | $2.03 Billion | ▼ -163.0% |
| 2019 | 0.04x | $79.14 Million | $1.87 Billion | ▼ -57.5% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $168.57 Million | $1.69 Billion | ▲ +1280.0% |
| 2017 | -0.01x | $-16.14 Million | $1.91 Billion | ▲ +78.3% |
| 2016 | -0.04x | $-66.86 Million | $1.72 Billion | ▼ -333.2% |
| 2015 | -0.01x | $-19.41 Million | $2.17 Billion | ▼ -125.8% |
| 2014 | 0.03x | $78.31 Million | $2.25 Billion | ▲ +2557.3% |
| 2013 | 0.00x | $-3.43 Million | $2.42 Billion | ▲ +67.5% |
| 2012 | 0.00x | $-9.45 Million | $2.17 Billion | ▼ -116.1% |
| 2011 | 0.03x | $81.54 Million | $3.01 Billion | ▲ +141.8% |
| 2010 | -0.06x | $-137.28 Million | $2.12 Billion | ▼ -307.1% |
| 2009 | 0.03x | $54.72 Million | $1.75 Billion | ▼ -42.3% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | $59.76 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▼ -19.3% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | $113.67 Million | $1.69 Billion | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2006 | 0.06x | $114.30 Million | $1.80 Billion | ▲ +232.7% |
| 2005 | -0.05x | $-89.73 Million | $1.88 Billion | ▼ -158.6% |
| 2004 | 0.08x | $121.99 Million | $1.49 Billion | ▲ +305.7% |
| 2003 | -0.04x | $-56.69 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▼ -845.7% |
| 2002 | 0.00x | $-3.24 Million | $771.93 Million | ▼ -108.6% |
| 2001 | 0.05x | $22.34 Million | $458.17 Million | ▼ -60.0% |
| 2000 | 0.12x | $53.57 Million | $439.05 Million | ▲ +496.2% |
| 1999 | -0.03x | $-14.50 Million | $470.80 Million | ▼ -89.8% |
| 1998 | -0.02x | $-8.12 Million | $500.44 Million | ▼ -115.1% |
| 1997 | 0.11x | $72.49 Million | $674.21 Million | ▲ +29.6% |
| 1996 | 0.08x | $31.86 Million | $384.04 Million | ▲ +1173.2% |
| 1995 | -0.01x | $-3.99 Million | $516.06 Million | ▲ +99.9% |
| 1991 | -5.32x | $-11.70 Million | $2.20 Million | — |