Oppenheimer Holdings Inc (OPY) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Oppenheimer Holdings Inc (OPY) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $63.42 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.90 Billion) in one year. See financial agility of Oppenheimer Holdings Inc to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Oppenheimer Holdings Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Oppenheimer Holdings Inc across 31 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Oppenheimer Holdings Inc.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Oppenheimer Holdings Inc (1991–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. Check OPY cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.04x | $-108.17 Million | $2.53 Billion | ▼ -373.6% |
| 2023 | -0.01x | $-18.81 Million | $2.09 Billion | ▼ -126.5% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $64.49 Million | $1.89 Billion | ▼ -68.8% |
| 2021 | 0.11x | $227.79 Million | $2.09 Billion | ▲ +508.9% |
| 2020 | -0.03x | $-54.06 Million | $2.03 Billion | ▼ -163.0% |
| 2019 | 0.04x | $79.14 Million | $1.87 Billion | ▼ -57.5% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $168.57 Million | $1.69 Billion | ▲ +1280.0% |
| 2017 | -0.01x | $-16.14 Million | $1.91 Billion | ▲ +78.3% |
| 2016 | -0.04x | $-66.86 Million | $1.72 Billion | ▼ -333.2% |
| 2015 | -0.01x | $-19.41 Million | $2.17 Billion | ▼ -125.8% |
| 2014 | 0.03x | $78.31 Million | $2.25 Billion | ▲ +2557.3% |
| 2013 | 0.00x | $-3.43 Million | $2.42 Billion | ▲ +67.5% |
| 2012 | 0.00x | $-9.45 Million | $2.17 Billion | ▼ -116.1% |
| 2011 | 0.03x | $81.54 Million | $3.01 Billion | ▲ +141.8% |
| 2010 | -0.06x | $-137.28 Million | $2.12 Billion | ▼ -307.1% |
| 2009 | 0.03x | $54.72 Million | $1.75 Billion | ▼ -42.3% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | $59.76 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▼ -19.3% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | $113.67 Million | $1.69 Billion | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2006 | 0.06x | $114.30 Million | $1.80 Billion | ▲ +232.7% |
| 2005 | -0.05x | $-89.73 Million | $1.88 Billion | ▼ -158.6% |
| 2004 | 0.08x | $121.99 Million | $1.49 Billion | ▲ +305.7% |
| 2003 | -0.04x | $-56.69 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▼ -845.7% |
| 2002 | 0.00x | $-3.24 Million | $771.93 Million | ▼ -108.6% |
| 2001 | 0.05x | $22.34 Million | $458.17 Million | ▼ -60.0% |
| 2000 | 0.12x | $53.57 Million | $439.05 Million | ▲ +496.2% |
| 1999 | -0.03x | $-14.50 Million | $470.80 Million | ▼ -89.8% |
| 1998 | -0.02x | $-8.12 Million | $500.44 Million | ▼ -115.1% |
| 1997 | 0.11x | $72.49 Million | $674.21 Million | ▲ +29.6% |
| 1996 | 0.08x | $31.86 Million | $384.04 Million | ▲ +1173.2% |
| 1995 | -0.01x | $-3.99 Million | $516.06 Million | ▲ +99.9% |
| 1991 | -5.32x | $-11.70 Million | $2.20 Million | — |