PAR Technology Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
PAR Technology Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. PAR Technology Corporation (PAR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-9.42 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($556.10 Million) in one year. Check PAR Technology Corporation (PAR) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of PAR Technology Corporation (1991–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of PAR Technology Corporation from 1991 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for PAR Technology Corporation across 35 annual periods. Check PAR Technology Corporation cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
PAR Technology Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1991–2025)
PAR Technology Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1991 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for PAR Technology Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see PAR Technology Corporation (PAR) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.05x | $-27.16 Million | $543.99 Million | ▼ -0.7% |
| 2024 | -0.05x | $-25.25 Million | $509.02 Million | ▼ -36.4% |
| 2023 | -0.04x | $-17.07 Million | $469.54 Million | ▲ +59.5% |
| 2022 | -0.09x | $-43.07 Million | $479.66 Million | ▲ +35.2% |
| 2021 | -0.14x | $-53.16 Million | $383.80 Million | ▼ -6.3% |
| 2020 | -0.13x | $-20.24 Million | $155.34 Million | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2019 | -0.14x | $-16.13 Million | $116.77 Million | ▼ -74.9% |
| 2018 | -0.08x | $-3.85 Million | $48.73 Million | ▼ -1247.9% |
| 2017 | 0.01x | $314.00K | $45.64 Million | ▼ -96.6% |
| 2016 | 0.20x | $11.00 Million | $54.93 Million | ▲ +1524.0% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $594.00K | $48.19 Million | ▼ -86.7% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $6.26 Million | $67.78 Million | ▲ +228.1% |
| 2013 | -0.07x | $-3.23 Million | $44.79 Million | ▼ -127.5% |
| 2012 | 0.26x | $13.36 Million | $50.94 Million | ▲ +3.9% |
| 2011 | 0.25x | $11.00 Million | $43.58 Million | ▲ +17.2% |
| 2010 | 0.22x | $12.39 Million | $57.53 Million | ▲ +61.1% |
| 2009 | 0.13x | $7.07 Million | $52.87 Million | ▲ +486.6% |
| 2008 | -0.03x | $-2.34 Million | $67.73 Million | ▼ -124.6% |
| 2007 | 0.14x | $8.66 Million | $61.53 Million | ▲ +324.9% |
| 2006 | -0.06x | $-3.55 Million | $56.71 Million | ▼ -125.4% |
| 2005 | 0.25x | $11.49 Million | $46.66 Million | ▼ -39.1% |
| 2004 | 0.40x | $19.49 Million | $48.18 Million | ▲ +280.4% |
| 2003 | 0.11x | $3.40 Million | $31.93 Million | ▲ +0.2% |
| 2002 | 0.11x | $3.60 Million | $33.92 Million | ▲ +1522.7% |
| 2001 | -0.01x | $-309.00K | $41.44 Million | ▲ +96.5% |
| 2000 | -0.21x | $-8.03 Million | $38.10 Million | ▼ -154.8% |
| 1999 | 0.38x | $10.00 Million | $26.00 Million | ▲ +426.9% |
| 1998 | -0.12x | $-3.60 Million | $30.60 Million | ▼ -45.6% |
| 1997 | -0.08x | $-1.60 Million | $19.80 Million | ▲ +60.4% |
| 1996 | -0.20x | $-2.90 Million | $14.20 Million | ▼ -282.9% |
| 1995 | -0.05x | $-800.00K | $15.00 Million | ▼ -108.0% |
| 1994 | 0.67x | $8.00 Million | $12.00 Million | ▲ +806.7% |
| 1993 | -0.09x | $-1.50 Million | $15.90 Million | ▼ -220.5% |
| 1992 | 0.08x | $900.00K | $11.50 Million | ▼ -93.3% |
| 1991 | 1.16x | $11.50 Million | $9.90 Million | — |