PAR Technology Corporation (PAR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
PAR Technology Corporation (PAR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $8.39 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($539.33 Million) in one year. See cash generation quality of PAR Technology Corporation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
PAR Technology Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for PAR Technology Corporation across 34 annual periods. Also explore PAR Technology Corporation net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for PAR Technology Corporation (1991–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for PAR Technology Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see PAR company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.05x | $-25.25 Million | $509.02 Million | ▼ -36.4% |
| 2023 | -0.04x | $-17.07 Million | $469.54 Million | ▲ +59.5% |
| 2022 | -0.09x | $-43.07 Million | $479.66 Million | ▲ +35.2% |
| 2021 | -0.14x | $-53.16 Million | $383.80 Million | ▼ -6.3% |
| 2020 | -0.13x | $-20.24 Million | $155.34 Million | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2019 | -0.14x | $-16.13 Million | $116.77 Million | ▼ -74.9% |
| 2018 | -0.08x | $-3.85 Million | $48.73 Million | ▼ -1247.9% |
| 2017 | 0.01x | $314.00K | $45.64 Million | ▼ -96.6% |
| 2016 | 0.20x | $11.00 Million | $54.93 Million | ▲ +1524.0% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $594.00K | $48.19 Million | ▼ -86.7% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $6.26 Million | $67.78 Million | ▲ +228.1% |
| 2013 | -0.07x | $-3.23 Million | $44.79 Million | ▼ -127.5% |
| 2012 | 0.26x | $13.36 Million | $50.94 Million | ▲ +3.9% |
| 2011 | 0.25x | $11.00 Million | $43.58 Million | ▲ +17.2% |
| 2010 | 0.22x | $12.39 Million | $57.53 Million | ▲ +61.1% |
| 2009 | 0.13x | $7.07 Million | $52.87 Million | ▲ +486.6% |
| 2008 | -0.03x | $-2.34 Million | $67.73 Million | ▼ -124.6% |
| 2007 | 0.14x | $8.66 Million | $61.53 Million | ▲ +324.9% |
| 2006 | -0.06x | $-3.55 Million | $56.71 Million | ▼ -125.4% |
| 2005 | 0.25x | $11.49 Million | $46.66 Million | ▼ -39.1% |
| 2004 | 0.40x | $19.49 Million | $48.18 Million | ▲ +280.4% |
| 2003 | 0.11x | $3.40 Million | $31.93 Million | ▲ +0.2% |
| 2002 | 0.11x | $3.60 Million | $33.92 Million | ▲ +1522.7% |
| 2001 | -0.01x | $-309.00K | $41.44 Million | ▲ +96.5% |
| 2000 | -0.21x | $-8.03 Million | $38.10 Million | ▼ -154.8% |
| 1999 | 0.38x | $10.00 Million | $26.00 Million | ▲ +426.9% |
| 1998 | -0.12x | $-3.60 Million | $30.60 Million | ▼ -45.6% |
| 1997 | -0.08x | $-1.60 Million | $19.80 Million | ▲ +60.4% |
| 1996 | -0.20x | $-2.90 Million | $14.20 Million | ▼ -282.9% |
| 1995 | -0.05x | $-800.00K | $15.00 Million | ▼ -108.0% |
| 1994 | 0.67x | $8.00 Million | $12.00 Million | ▲ +806.7% |
| 1993 | -0.09x | $-1.50 Million | $15.90 Million | ▼ -220.5% |
| 1992 | 0.08x | $900.00K | $11.50 Million | ▼ -93.3% |
| 1991 | 1.16x | $11.50 Million | $9.90 Million | — |