Permian Basin Royalty Trust (PBT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Permian Basin Royalty Trust (PBT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 7.61x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $14.30 Million could theoretically repay 8% of its total liabilities ($1.88 Million) in one year. See Permian Basin Royalty Trust (PBT) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Permian Basin Royalty Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Permian Basin Royalty Trust across 32 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Permian Basin Royalty Trust generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Permian Basin Royalty Trust (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Permian Basin Royalty Trust. Check PBT cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 8.34x | $14.30 Million | $1.72 Million | ▼ -30.2% |
| 2024 | 11.95x | $25.36 Million | $2.12 Million | ▲ +224.7% |
| 2023 | -9.58x | $-57.96 Million | $6.05 Million | ▲ +62.7% |
| 2022 | -25.65x | $-73.25 Million | $2.86 Million | ▼ -91.1% |
| 2021 | -13.43x | $-30.19 Million | $2.25 Million | ▲ +44.4% |
| 2020 | -24.13x | $-41.63 Million | $1.73 Million | ▼ -456.4% |
| 2019 | 6.77x | $19.38 Million | $2.86 Million | ▼ -22.3% |
| 2018 | 8.71x | $30.73 Million | $3.53 Million | ▲ +1.9% |
| 2017 | 8.55x | $29.25 Million | $3.42 Million | ▲ +68.4% |
| 2016 | 5.08x | $19.27 Million | $3.80 Million | ▼ -53.5% |
| 2015 | 10.93x | $16.01 Million | $1.46 Million | ▼ -51.7% |
| 2014 | 22.64x | $47.66 Million | $2.11 Million | ▲ +75.3% |
| 2013 | 12.91x | $40.50 Million | $3.14 Million | ▼ -38.3% |
| 2012 | 20.94x | $53.90 Million | $2.57 Million | ▲ +56.4% |
| 2011 | 13.39x | $63.30 Million | $4.73 Million | ▼ -4.2% |
| 2010 | 13.97x | $64.00 Million | $4.58 Million | ▲ +103.7% |
| 2009 | 6.86x | $37.60 Million | $5.48 Million | ▼ -68.3% |
| 2008 | 21.63x | $111.34 Million | $5.15 Million | ▲ +162.0% |
| 2007 | 8.26x | $67.47 Million | $8.17 Million | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2006 | 12.76x | $65.54 Million | $5.14 Million | ▲ +46.1% |
| 2005 | 8.73x | $63.44 Million | $7.26 Million | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2004 | 8.17x | $44.35 Million | $5.43 Million | ▼ -26.5% |
| 2003 | 11.11x | $31.93 Million | $2.87 Million | ▲ +13.5% |
| 2002 | 9.79x | $23.22 Million | $2.37 Million | ▼ -54.0% |
| 2001 | 21.30x | $39.25 Million | $1.84 Million | ▲ +79.9% |
| 2000 | 11.84x | $36.19 Million | $3.06 Million | ▲ +40.4% |
| 1999 | 8.43x | $20.36 Million | $2.42 Million | ▼ -52.0% |
| 1998 | 17.55x | $9.22 Million | $525.19K | ▲ +39.0% |
| 1997 | 12.62x | $21.76 Million | $1.72 Million | ▲ +32.9% |
| 1996 | 9.50x | $20.45 Million | $2.15 Million | ▲ +2.1% |
| 1995 | 9.30x | $11.12 Million | $1.20 Million | ▼ -24.7% |
| 1992 | 12.35x | $21.00 Million | $1.70 Million | — |