Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust (PIM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust (PIM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of September 2021, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.16 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($170.27 Million) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2021)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust across 26 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust (1996–2021)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see PIM market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 0.02x | $3.16 Million | $170.27 Million | ▲ +184.3% |
| 2020 | -0.02x | $-9.17 Million | $416.75 Million | ▼ -145.8% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | $11.35 Million | $236.30 Million | ▼ -39.3% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $10.53 Million | $133.08 Million | ▼ -26.7% |
| 2017 | 0.11x | $25.76 Million | $238.70 Million | ▲ +278.7% |
| 2016 | 0.03x | $7.06 Million | $247.76 Million | ▲ +144.8% |
| 2015 | -0.06x | $-18.85 Million | $296.47 Million | ▼ -116.4% |
| 2014 | 0.39x | $25.50 Million | $65.91 Million | ▲ +17.9% |
| 2013 | 0.33x | $23.70 Million | $72.24 Million | ▲ +87.2% |
| 2012 | 0.18x | $27.50 Million | $156.90 Million | ▲ +2029.8% |
| 2011 | -0.01x | $-1.90 Million | $209.20 Million | ▼ -102.0% |
| 2010 | 0.45x | $62.80 Million | $139.90 Million | ▲ +188.0% |
| 2009 | 0.16x | $36.40 Million | $233.50 Million | ▲ +147.7% |
| 2008 | -0.33x | $-57.40 Million | $175.80 Million | ▼ -178.5% |
| 2007 | 0.42x | $32.80 Million | $78.90 Million | ▼ -28.3% |
| 2006 | 0.58x | $28.80 Million | $49.70 Million | ▲ +26.6% |
| 2005 | 0.46x | $35.80 Million | $78.20 Million | ▲ +61.3% |
| 2004 | 0.28x | $63.60 Million | $224.10 Million | ▼ -77.4% |
| 2003 | 1.25x | $120.80 Million | $96.30 Million | ▲ +167.2% |
| 2002 | 0.47x | $26.20 Million | $55.80 Million | ▲ +750.7% |
| 2001 | 0.06x | $1.70 Million | $30.80 Million | ▼ -90.0% |
| 2000 | 0.55x | $20.70 Million | $37.40 Million | ▲ +45.1% |
| 1999 | 0.38x | $10.30 Million | $27.00 Million | ▲ +554.7% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | $3.70 Million | $63.50 Million | ▼ -92.3% |
| 1997 | 0.75x | $32.20 Million | $42.70 Million | ▼ -34.3% |
| 1996 | 1.15x | $32.00 Million | $27.90 Million | — |