Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust cash flow-to-debt ratio. Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust (PIM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of September 2021, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.16 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($170.27 Million) in one year. Check Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust (1996–2021)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust from 1996 to 2021. Historical debt coverage capacity for Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust across 26 annual periods. Check PIM total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2021)
Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2021. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 0.02x | $3.16 Million | $170.27 Million | ▲ +184.3% |
| 2020 | -0.02x | $-9.17 Million | $416.75 Million | ▼ -145.8% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | $11.35 Million | $236.30 Million | ▼ -39.3% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $10.53 Million | $133.08 Million | ▼ -26.7% |
| 2017 | 0.11x | $25.76 Million | $238.70 Million | ▲ +278.7% |
| 2016 | 0.03x | $7.06 Million | $247.76 Million | ▲ +144.8% |
| 2015 | -0.06x | $-18.85 Million | $296.47 Million | ▼ -116.4% |
| 2014 | 0.39x | $25.50 Million | $65.91 Million | ▲ +17.9% |
| 2013 | 0.33x | $23.70 Million | $72.24 Million | ▲ +87.2% |
| 2012 | 0.18x | $27.50 Million | $156.90 Million | ▲ +2029.8% |
| 2011 | -0.01x | $-1.90 Million | $209.20 Million | ▼ -102.0% |
| 2010 | 0.45x | $62.80 Million | $139.90 Million | ▲ +188.0% |
| 2009 | 0.16x | $36.40 Million | $233.50 Million | ▲ +147.7% |
| 2008 | -0.33x | $-57.40 Million | $175.80 Million | ▼ -178.5% |
| 2007 | 0.42x | $32.80 Million | $78.90 Million | ▼ -28.3% |
| 2006 | 0.58x | $28.80 Million | $49.70 Million | ▲ +26.6% |
| 2005 | 0.46x | $35.80 Million | $78.20 Million | ▲ +61.3% |
| 2004 | 0.28x | $63.60 Million | $224.10 Million | ▼ -77.4% |
| 2003 | 1.25x | $120.80 Million | $96.30 Million | ▲ +167.2% |
| 2002 | 0.47x | $26.20 Million | $55.80 Million | ▲ +750.7% |
| 2001 | 0.06x | $1.70 Million | $30.80 Million | ▼ -90.0% |
| 2000 | 0.55x | $20.70 Million | $37.40 Million | ▲ +45.1% |
| 1999 | 0.38x | $10.30 Million | $27.00 Million | ▲ +554.7% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | $3.70 Million | $63.50 Million | ▼ -92.3% |
| 1997 | 0.75x | $32.20 Million | $42.70 Million | ▼ -34.3% |
| 1996 | 1.15x | $32.00 Million | $27.90 Million | — |