Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust (PIM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust (PIM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of September 2021, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.16 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($170.27 Million) in one year. Explore Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust long-term investment allocation to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2021)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust across 26 annual periods. Also explore Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust assets under control for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust (1996–2021)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see PIM company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 0.02x | $3.16 Million | $170.27 Million | ▲ +184.3% |
| 2020 | -0.02x | $-9.17 Million | $416.75 Million | ▼ -145.8% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | $11.35 Million | $236.30 Million | ▼ -39.3% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $10.53 Million | $133.08 Million | ▼ -26.7% |
| 2017 | 0.11x | $25.76 Million | $238.70 Million | ▲ +278.7% |
| 2016 | 0.03x | $7.06 Million | $247.76 Million | ▲ +144.8% |
| 2015 | -0.06x | $-18.85 Million | $296.47 Million | ▼ -116.4% |
| 2014 | 0.39x | $25.50 Million | $65.91 Million | ▲ +17.9% |
| 2013 | 0.33x | $23.70 Million | $72.24 Million | ▲ +87.2% |
| 2012 | 0.18x | $27.50 Million | $156.90 Million | ▲ +2029.8% |
| 2011 | -0.01x | $-1.90 Million | $209.20 Million | ▼ -102.0% |
| 2010 | 0.45x | $62.80 Million | $139.90 Million | ▲ +188.0% |
| 2009 | 0.16x | $36.40 Million | $233.50 Million | ▲ +147.7% |
| 2008 | -0.33x | $-57.40 Million | $175.80 Million | ▼ -178.5% |
| 2007 | 0.42x | $32.80 Million | $78.90 Million | ▼ -28.3% |
| 2006 | 0.58x | $28.80 Million | $49.70 Million | ▲ +26.6% |
| 2005 | 0.46x | $35.80 Million | $78.20 Million | ▲ +61.3% |
| 2004 | 0.28x | $63.60 Million | $224.10 Million | ▼ -77.4% |
| 2003 | 1.25x | $120.80 Million | $96.30 Million | ▲ +167.2% |
| 2002 | 0.47x | $26.20 Million | $55.80 Million | ▲ +750.7% |
| 2001 | 0.06x | $1.70 Million | $30.80 Million | ▼ -90.0% |
| 2000 | 0.55x | $20.70 Million | $37.40 Million | ▲ +45.1% |
| 1999 | 0.38x | $10.30 Million | $27.00 Million | ▲ +554.7% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | $3.70 Million | $63.50 Million | ▼ -92.3% |
| 1997 | 0.75x | $32.20 Million | $42.70 Million | ▼ -34.3% |
| 1996 | 1.15x | $32.00 Million | $27.90 Million | — |