Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust (PIM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust (PIM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of September 2021, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.16 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($170.27 Million) in one year. See PIM financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2021)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust across 26 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see PIM cash flow metrics.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust (1996–2021)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust. Check PIM cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 0.02x | $3.16 Million | $170.27 Million | ▲ +184.3% |
| 2020 | -0.02x | $-9.17 Million | $416.75 Million | ▼ -145.8% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | $11.35 Million | $236.30 Million | ▼ -39.3% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $10.53 Million | $133.08 Million | ▼ -26.7% |
| 2017 | 0.11x | $25.76 Million | $238.70 Million | ▲ +278.7% |
| 2016 | 0.03x | $7.06 Million | $247.76 Million | ▲ +144.8% |
| 2015 | -0.06x | $-18.85 Million | $296.47 Million | ▼ -116.4% |
| 2014 | 0.39x | $25.50 Million | $65.91 Million | ▲ +17.9% |
| 2013 | 0.33x | $23.70 Million | $72.24 Million | ▲ +87.2% |
| 2012 | 0.18x | $27.50 Million | $156.90 Million | ▲ +2029.8% |
| 2011 | -0.01x | $-1.90 Million | $209.20 Million | ▼ -102.0% |
| 2010 | 0.45x | $62.80 Million | $139.90 Million | ▲ +188.0% |
| 2009 | 0.16x | $36.40 Million | $233.50 Million | ▲ +147.7% |
| 2008 | -0.33x | $-57.40 Million | $175.80 Million | ▼ -178.5% |
| 2007 | 0.42x | $32.80 Million | $78.90 Million | ▼ -28.3% |
| 2006 | 0.58x | $28.80 Million | $49.70 Million | ▲ +26.6% |
| 2005 | 0.46x | $35.80 Million | $78.20 Million | ▲ +61.3% |
| 2004 | 0.28x | $63.60 Million | $224.10 Million | ▼ -77.4% |
| 2003 | 1.25x | $120.80 Million | $96.30 Million | ▲ +167.2% |
| 2002 | 0.47x | $26.20 Million | $55.80 Million | ▲ +750.7% |
| 2001 | 0.06x | $1.70 Million | $30.80 Million | ▼ -90.0% |
| 2000 | 0.55x | $20.70 Million | $37.40 Million | ▲ +45.1% |
| 1999 | 0.38x | $10.30 Million | $27.00 Million | ▲ +554.7% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | $3.70 Million | $63.50 Million | ▼ -92.3% |
| 1997 | 0.75x | $32.20 Million | $42.70 Million | ▼ -34.3% |
| 1996 | 1.15x | $32.00 Million | $27.90 Million | — |