RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Latest as of December 2025:
0.06x
RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $122.10 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.88 Billion) in one year. See free cash flow generation of RBC Bearings Incorporated to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
0.06x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities
Operating Cash Flow
$122.10 Million
USD
Total Liabilities
$1.88 Billion
USD
Data as of
Dec 2025
Most recent filing
RBC Bearings Incorporated Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for RBC Bearings Incorporated across 59 annual periods. Also explore RBC Bearings Incorporated equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for RBC Bearings Incorporated (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for RBC Bearings Incorporated. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see RBC market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.18x | $293.60 Million | $1.65 Billion | ▲ +24.5% |
| 2024 | 0.14x | $274.70 Million | $1.93 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.14x | $274.70 Million | $1.93 Billion | ▲ +39.2% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $220.60 Million | $2.15 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | $220.60 Million | $2.15 Billion | ▲ +40.4% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | $180.29 Million | $2.47 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | $180.29 Million | $2.47 Billion | ▼ -90.2% |
| 2021 | 0.75x | $152.45 Million | $204.31 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2020 | 0.75x | $152.45 Million | $204.31 Million | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2020 | 0.76x | $155.62 Million | $203.91 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.76x | $155.62 Million | $203.91 Million | ▲ +25.7% |
| 2019 | 0.61x | $108.55 Million | $178.80 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.61x | $108.55 Million | $178.80 Million | ▲ +43.6% |
| 2018 | 0.42x | $130.29 Million | $308.20 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2017 | 0.42x | $130.29 Million | $308.20 Million | ▲ +63.6% |
| 2017 | 0.26x | $101.24 Million | $391.80 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0.26x | $101.24 Million | $391.80 Million | ▲ +48.0% |
| 2016 | 0.17x | $83.36 Million | $477.56 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0.17x | $83.36 Million | $477.56 Million | ▼ -79.9% |
| 2015 | 0.87x | $71.79 Million | $82.64 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2014 | 0.87x | $71.79 Million | $82.64 Million | ▲ +49.5% |
| 2014 | 0.58x | $47.98 Million | $82.54 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.58x | $47.98 Million | $82.54 Million | ▼ -29.6% |
| 2013 | 0.83x | $66.26 Million | $80.25 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.83x | $66.26 Million | $80.25 Million | ▲ +35.2% |
| 2012 | 0.61x | $45.03 Million | $73.70 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.61x | $45.03 Million | $73.70 Million | ▲ +17.3% |
| 2011 | 0.52x | $49.96 Million | $95.92 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.52x | $49.96 Million | $95.92 Million | ▲ +17.0% |
| 2010 | 0.45x | $41.15 Million | $92.41 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.45x | $41.15 Million | $92.41 Million | ▲ +25.5% |
| 2009 | 0.35x | $44.74 Million | $126.06 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.35x | $44.74 Million | $126.06 Million | ▲ +48.4% |
| 2008 | 0.24x | $27.08 Million | $113.20 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.24x | $27.08 Million | $113.20 Million | ▼ -54.7% |
| 2007 | 0.53x | $55.73 Million | $105.54 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.53x | $55.73 Million | $105.54 Million | ▲ +334.1% |
| 2006 | 0.12x | $24.64 Million | $202.58 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | $24.64 Million | $202.58 Million | ▲ +217.9% |
| 2005 | 0.04x | $9.87 Million | $257.93 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.04x | $9.87 Million | $257.93 Million | ▲ +27.3% |
| 2004 | 0.03x | $7.54 Million | $251.03 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.03x | $7.54 Million | $251.03 Million | ▼ -86.2% |
| 2003 | 0.22x | $54.41 Million | $250.00 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.22x | $54.41 Million | $250.00 Million | ▼ -31.6% |
| 2002 | 0.32x | $81.77 Million | $256.94 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.32x | $81.77 Million | $256.94 Million | ▲ +51.2% |
| 2001 | 0.21x | $52.09 Million | $247.51 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.21x | $52.09 Million | $247.51 Million | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2000 | 0.28x | $70.30 Million | $252.50 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.28x | $70.30 Million | $252.50 Million | ▲ +42.2% |
| 1999 | 0.20x | $50.40 Million | $257.50 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.20x | $50.40 Million | $257.50 Million | ▼ -26.4% |
| 1998 | 0.27x | $78.80 Million | $296.20 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.27x | $78.80 Million | $296.20 Million | ▼ -81.7% |
| 1997 | 1.45x | $53.70 Million | $37.00 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1996 | 1.45x | $53.70 Million | $37.00 Million | ▲ +61.0% |
| 1996 | 0.90x | $35.70 Million | $39.60 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.90x | $35.70 Million | $39.60 Million | — |
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.