RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Latest as of June 2026:
0.10x
RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $171.80 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.73 Billion) in one year. See RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
0.10x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities
Operating Cash Flow
$171.80 Million
USD
Total Liabilities
$1.73 Billion
USD
Data as of
Jun 2026
Most recent filing
RBC Bearings Incorporated Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for RBC Bearings Incorporated across 60 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for RBC Bearings Incorporated (1995–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for RBC Bearings Incorporated. Check how high is RBC Bearings Incorporated's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.24x | $415.70 Million | $1.76 Billion | ▲ +32.9% |
| 2025 | 0.18x | $293.60 Million | $1.65 Billion | ▲ +24.5% |
| 2024 | 0.14x | $274.70 Million | $1.93 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.14x | $274.70 Million | $1.93 Billion | ▲ +39.2% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $220.60 Million | $2.15 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | $220.60 Million | $2.15 Billion | ▲ +40.4% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | $180.29 Million | $2.47 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | $180.29 Million | $2.47 Billion | ▼ -90.2% |
| 2021 | 0.75x | $152.45 Million | $204.31 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2020 | 0.75x | $152.45 Million | $204.31 Million | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2020 | 0.76x | $155.62 Million | $203.91 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.76x | $155.62 Million | $203.91 Million | ▲ +25.7% |
| 2019 | 0.61x | $108.55 Million | $178.80 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.61x | $108.55 Million | $178.80 Million | ▲ +43.6% |
| 2018 | 0.42x | $130.29 Million | $308.20 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2017 | 0.42x | $130.29 Million | $308.20 Million | ▲ +63.6% |
| 2017 | 0.26x | $101.24 Million | $391.80 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0.26x | $101.24 Million | $391.80 Million | ▲ +48.0% |
| 2016 | 0.17x | $83.36 Million | $477.56 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0.17x | $83.36 Million | $477.56 Million | ▼ -79.9% |
| 2015 | 0.87x | $71.79 Million | $82.64 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2014 | 0.87x | $71.79 Million | $82.64 Million | ▲ +49.5% |
| 2014 | 0.58x | $47.98 Million | $82.54 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.58x | $47.98 Million | $82.54 Million | ▼ -29.6% |
| 2013 | 0.83x | $66.26 Million | $80.25 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.83x | $66.26 Million | $80.25 Million | ▲ +35.2% |
| 2012 | 0.61x | $45.03 Million | $73.70 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.61x | $45.03 Million | $73.70 Million | ▲ +17.3% |
| 2011 | 0.52x | $49.96 Million | $95.92 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.52x | $49.96 Million | $95.92 Million | ▲ +17.0% |
| 2010 | 0.45x | $41.15 Million | $92.41 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.45x | $41.15 Million | $92.41 Million | ▲ +25.5% |
| 2009 | 0.35x | $44.74 Million | $126.06 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.35x | $44.74 Million | $126.06 Million | ▲ +48.4% |
| 2008 | 0.24x | $27.08 Million | $113.20 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.24x | $27.08 Million | $113.20 Million | ▼ -54.7% |
| 2007 | 0.53x | $55.73 Million | $105.54 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.53x | $55.73 Million | $105.54 Million | ▲ +334.1% |
| 2006 | 0.12x | $24.64 Million | $202.58 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | $24.64 Million | $202.58 Million | ▲ +217.9% |
| 2005 | 0.04x | $9.87 Million | $257.93 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.04x | $9.87 Million | $257.93 Million | ▲ +27.3% |
| 2004 | 0.03x | $7.54 Million | $251.03 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.03x | $7.54 Million | $251.03 Million | ▼ -86.2% |
| 2003 | 0.22x | $54.41 Million | $250.00 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.22x | $54.41 Million | $250.00 Million | ▼ -31.6% |
| 2002 | 0.32x | $81.77 Million | $256.94 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.32x | $81.77 Million | $256.94 Million | ▲ +51.2% |
| 2001 | 0.21x | $52.09 Million | $247.51 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.21x | $52.09 Million | $247.51 Million | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2000 | 0.28x | $70.30 Million | $252.50 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.28x | $70.30 Million | $252.50 Million | ▲ +42.2% |
| 1999 | 0.20x | $50.40 Million | $257.50 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.20x | $50.40 Million | $257.50 Million | ▼ -26.4% |
| 1998 | 0.27x | $78.80 Million | $296.20 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.27x | $78.80 Million | $296.20 Million | ▼ -81.7% |
| 1997 | 1.45x | $53.70 Million | $37.00 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1996 | 1.45x | $53.70 Million | $37.00 Million | ▲ +61.0% |
| 1996 | 0.90x | $35.70 Million | $39.60 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.90x | $35.70 Million | $39.60 Million | — |
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.