RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Latest as of December 2025:
0.06x
RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $122.10 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.88 Billion) in one year. Explore RBC Bearings Incorporated long-term investment allocation to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
0.06x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities
Operating Cash Flow
$122.10 Million
USD
Total Liabilities
$1.88 Billion
USD
Data as of
Dec 2025
Most recent filing
RBC Bearings Incorporated Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for RBC Bearings Incorporated across 59 annual periods. Also explore RBC Bearings Incorporated assets under control for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for RBC Bearings Incorporated (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for RBC Bearings Incorporated. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see RBC Bearings Incorporated market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.18x | $293.60 Million | $1.65 Billion | ▲ +24.5% |
| 2024 | 0.14x | $274.70 Million | $1.93 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.14x | $274.70 Million | $1.93 Billion | ▲ +39.2% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $220.60 Million | $2.15 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | $220.60 Million | $2.15 Billion | ▲ +40.4% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | $180.29 Million | $2.47 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | $180.29 Million | $2.47 Billion | ▼ -90.2% |
| 2021 | 0.75x | $152.45 Million | $204.31 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2020 | 0.75x | $152.45 Million | $204.31 Million | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2020 | 0.76x | $155.62 Million | $203.91 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.76x | $155.62 Million | $203.91 Million | ▲ +25.7% |
| 2019 | 0.61x | $108.55 Million | $178.80 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.61x | $108.55 Million | $178.80 Million | ▲ +43.6% |
| 2018 | 0.42x | $130.29 Million | $308.20 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2017 | 0.42x | $130.29 Million | $308.20 Million | ▲ +63.6% |
| 2017 | 0.26x | $101.24 Million | $391.80 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0.26x | $101.24 Million | $391.80 Million | ▲ +48.0% |
| 2016 | 0.17x | $83.36 Million | $477.56 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0.17x | $83.36 Million | $477.56 Million | ▼ -79.9% |
| 2015 | 0.87x | $71.79 Million | $82.64 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2014 | 0.87x | $71.79 Million | $82.64 Million | ▲ +49.5% |
| 2014 | 0.58x | $47.98 Million | $82.54 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.58x | $47.98 Million | $82.54 Million | ▼ -29.6% |
| 2013 | 0.83x | $66.26 Million | $80.25 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.83x | $66.26 Million | $80.25 Million | ▲ +35.2% |
| 2012 | 0.61x | $45.03 Million | $73.70 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.61x | $45.03 Million | $73.70 Million | ▲ +17.3% |
| 2011 | 0.52x | $49.96 Million | $95.92 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.52x | $49.96 Million | $95.92 Million | ▲ +17.0% |
| 2010 | 0.45x | $41.15 Million | $92.41 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.45x | $41.15 Million | $92.41 Million | ▲ +25.5% |
| 2009 | 0.35x | $44.74 Million | $126.06 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.35x | $44.74 Million | $126.06 Million | ▲ +48.4% |
| 2008 | 0.24x | $27.08 Million | $113.20 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.24x | $27.08 Million | $113.20 Million | ▼ -54.7% |
| 2007 | 0.53x | $55.73 Million | $105.54 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.53x | $55.73 Million | $105.54 Million | ▲ +334.1% |
| 2006 | 0.12x | $24.64 Million | $202.58 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | $24.64 Million | $202.58 Million | ▲ +217.9% |
| 2005 | 0.04x | $9.87 Million | $257.93 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.04x | $9.87 Million | $257.93 Million | ▲ +27.3% |
| 2004 | 0.03x | $7.54 Million | $251.03 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.03x | $7.54 Million | $251.03 Million | ▼ -86.2% |
| 2003 | 0.22x | $54.41 Million | $250.00 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.22x | $54.41 Million | $250.00 Million | ▼ -31.6% |
| 2002 | 0.32x | $81.77 Million | $256.94 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.32x | $81.77 Million | $256.94 Million | ▲ +51.2% |
| 2001 | 0.21x | $52.09 Million | $247.51 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.21x | $52.09 Million | $247.51 Million | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2000 | 0.28x | $70.30 Million | $252.50 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.28x | $70.30 Million | $252.50 Million | ▲ +42.2% |
| 1999 | 0.20x | $50.40 Million | $257.50 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.20x | $50.40 Million | $257.50 Million | ▼ -26.4% |
| 1998 | 0.27x | $78.80 Million | $296.20 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.27x | $78.80 Million | $296.20 Million | ▼ -81.7% |
| 1997 | 1.45x | $53.70 Million | $37.00 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1996 | 1.45x | $53.70 Million | $37.00 Million | ▲ +61.0% |
| 1996 | 0.90x | $35.70 Million | $39.60 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.90x | $35.70 Million | $39.60 Million | — |
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.