Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co (RS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co (RS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $151.40 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($3.68 Billion) in one year. See cash generation quality of Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co across 33 annual periods. Also explore RS net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.26x | $831.40 Million | $3.19 Billion | ▼ -49.2% |
| 2024 | 0.51x | $1.43 Billion | $2.79 Billion | ▼ -15.8% |
| 2023 | 0.61x | $1.67 Billion | $2.75 Billion | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2022 | 0.66x | $2.12 Billion | $3.23 Billion | ▲ +182.1% |
| 2021 | 0.23x | $799.40 Million | $3.44 Billion | ▼ -40.9% |
| 2020 | 0.39x | $1.17 Billion | $2.98 Billion | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2019 | 0.45x | $1.30 Billion | $2.92 Billion | ▲ +125.9% |
| 2018 | 0.20x | $664.60 Million | $3.37 Billion | ▲ +51.0% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $399.00 Million | $3.05 Billion | ▼ -32.5% |
| 2016 | 0.19x | $626.50 Million | $3.23 Billion | ▼ -39.9% |
| 2015 | 0.32x | $1.02 Billion | $3.18 Billion | ▲ +235.9% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | $356.00 Million | $3.71 Billion | ▼ -47.6% |
| 2013 | 0.18x | $633.30 Million | $3.46 Billion | ▼ -30.3% |
| 2012 | 0.26x | $601.90 Million | $2.29 Billion | ▲ +174.7% |
| 2011 | 0.10x | $234.80 Million | $2.45 Billion | ▼ -17.8% |
| 2010 | 0.12x | $214.09 Million | $1.84 Billion | ▼ -79.0% |
| 2009 | 0.56x | $943.00 Million | $1.70 Billion | ▲ +130.5% |
| 2008 | 0.24x | $664.68 Million | $2.76 Billion | ▼ -29.3% |
| 2007 | 0.34x | $638.96 Million | $1.88 Billion | ▲ +233.0% |
| 2006 | 0.10x | $190.96 Million | $1.87 Billion | ▼ -72.9% |
| 2005 | 0.38x | $272.22 Million | $722.08 Million | ▲ +124.5% |
| 2004 | 0.17x | $121.77 Million | $725.24 Million | ▲ +12.4% |
| 2003 | 0.15x | $106.41 Million | $712.42 Million | ▼ -14.6% |
| 2002 | 0.17x | $90.74 Million | $518.68 Million | ▼ -15.8% |
| 2001 | 0.21x | $103.59 Million | $498.41 Million | ▲ +404.8% |
| 2000 | 0.04x | $24.46 Million | $594.20 Million | ▼ -84.3% |
| 1999 | 0.26x | $131.40 Million | $499.70 Million | ▲ +321.8% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | $30.90 Million | $495.60 Million | ▼ -57.6% |
| 1997 | 0.15x | $39.80 Million | $270.70 Million | ▼ -19.8% |
| 1996 | 0.18x | $36.40 Million | $198.60 Million | ▼ -55.1% |
| 1995 | 0.41x | $39.40 Million | $96.60 Million | ▲ +594.8% |
| 1994 | 0.06x | $2.90 Million | $49.40 Million | ▼ -2.2% |
| 1993 | 0.06x | $4.40 Million | $73.30 Million | — |