Sabine Royalty Trust (SBR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Sabine Royalty Trust (SBR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 92.22x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $73.43 Million could theoretically repay 92% of its total liabilities ($796.29K) in one year. See Sabine Royalty Trust (SBR) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Sabine Royalty Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Sabine Royalty Trust across 31 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Sabine Royalty Trust operating cash flow efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Sabine Royalty Trust (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Sabine Royalty Trust. Check SBR operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 92.22x | $73.43 Million | $796.29K | ▼ -37.1% |
| 2024 | 146.53x | $79.63 Million | $543.43K | ▲ +238.5% |
| 2023 | -105.83x | $-93.01 Million | $878.92K | ▼ -520.3% |
| 2022 | 25.18x | $122.69 Million | $4.87 Million | ▼ -38.5% |
| 2021 | 40.92x | $57.86 Million | $1.41 Million | ▲ +2594.7% |
| 2020 | -1.64x | $-1.58 Million | $965.96K | ▼ -104.7% |
| 2019 | 34.82x | $44.01 Million | $1.26 Million | ▲ +165.0% |
| 2018 | 13.14x | $49.90 Million | $3.80 Million | ▼ -72.1% |
| 2017 | 47.15x | $34.70 Million | $735.88K | ▲ +39.4% |
| 2016 | 33.83x | $27.44 Million | $811.15K | ▼ -31.3% |
| 2015 | 49.21x | $45.92 Million | $933.16K | ▲ +93.8% |
| 2014 | 25.39x | $58.64 Million | $2.31 Million | ▼ -43.1% |
| 2013 | 44.63x | $58.67 Million | $1.31 Million | ▲ +1.5% |
| 2012 | 43.99x | $52.27 Million | $1.19 Million | ▼ -62.2% |
| 2011 | 116.41x | $58.49 Million | $502.44K | ▼ -40.3% |
| 2010 | 194.98x | $53.90 Million | $276.43K | ▲ +62.9% |
| 2009 | 119.70x | $39.16 Million | $327.14K | ▼ -48.5% |
| 2008 | 232.25x | $88.92 Million | $382.87K | ▲ +226.7% |
| 2007 | 71.08x | $56.96 Million | $801.35K | ▼ -55.8% |
| 2006 | 160.71x | $59.72 Million | $371.60K | ▲ +0.7% |
| 2005 | 159.56x | $51.84 Million | $324.87K | ▲ +53.2% |
| 2004 | 104.14x | $40.59 Million | $389.74K | ▲ +141.4% |
| 2003 | 43.14x | $36.84 Million | $854.05K | ▲ +25.2% |
| 2002 | 34.45x | $27.15 Million | $788.06K | ▼ -85.6% |
| 2001 | 238.65x | $42.55 Million | $178.28K | ▲ +231.5% |
| 1999 | 72.00x | $21.60 Million | $300.00K | ▲ +60.7% |
| 1998 | 44.80x | $22.40 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +82.9% |
| 1997 | 24.50x | $24.50 Million | $1.00 Million | ▲ +17.8% |
| 1996 | 20.80x | $20.80 Million | $1.00 Million | ▲ +66.4% |
| 1995 | 12.50x | $15.00 Million | $1.20 Million | ▲ +13850.0% |
| 1994 | -0.09x | $-100.00K | $1.10 Million | — |