Sabine Royalty Trust (SBR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Sabine Royalty Trust (SBR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 92.22x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $73.43 Million could theoretically repay 92% of its total liabilities ($796.29K) in one year. Explore SBR long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Sabine Royalty Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Sabine Royalty Trust across 31 annual periods. Also explore SBR current and non-current assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Sabine Royalty Trust (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Sabine Royalty Trust. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Sabine Royalty Trust (SBR) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 92.22x | $73.43 Million | $796.29K | ▼ -37.1% |
| 2024 | 146.53x | $79.63 Million | $543.43K | ▲ +238.5% |
| 2023 | -105.83x | $-93.01 Million | $878.92K | ▼ -520.3% |
| 2022 | 25.18x | $122.69 Million | $4.87 Million | ▼ -38.5% |
| 2021 | 40.92x | $57.86 Million | $1.41 Million | ▲ +2594.7% |
| 2020 | -1.64x | $-1.58 Million | $965.96K | ▼ -104.7% |
| 2019 | 34.82x | $44.01 Million | $1.26 Million | ▲ +165.0% |
| 2018 | 13.14x | $49.90 Million | $3.80 Million | ▼ -72.1% |
| 2017 | 47.15x | $34.70 Million | $735.88K | ▲ +39.4% |
| 2016 | 33.83x | $27.44 Million | $811.15K | ▼ -31.3% |
| 2015 | 49.21x | $45.92 Million | $933.16K | ▲ +93.8% |
| 2014 | 25.39x | $58.64 Million | $2.31 Million | ▼ -43.1% |
| 2013 | 44.63x | $58.67 Million | $1.31 Million | ▲ +1.5% |
| 2012 | 43.99x | $52.27 Million | $1.19 Million | ▼ -62.2% |
| 2011 | 116.41x | $58.49 Million | $502.44K | ▼ -40.3% |
| 2010 | 194.98x | $53.90 Million | $276.43K | ▲ +62.9% |
| 2009 | 119.70x | $39.16 Million | $327.14K | ▼ -48.5% |
| 2008 | 232.25x | $88.92 Million | $382.87K | ▲ +226.7% |
| 2007 | 71.08x | $56.96 Million | $801.35K | ▼ -55.8% |
| 2006 | 160.71x | $59.72 Million | $371.60K | ▲ +0.7% |
| 2005 | 159.56x | $51.84 Million | $324.87K | ▲ +53.2% |
| 2004 | 104.14x | $40.59 Million | $389.74K | ▲ +141.4% |
| 2003 | 43.14x | $36.84 Million | $854.05K | ▲ +25.2% |
| 2002 | 34.45x | $27.15 Million | $788.06K | ▼ -85.6% |
| 2001 | 238.65x | $42.55 Million | $178.28K | ▲ +231.5% |
| 1999 | 72.00x | $21.60 Million | $300.00K | ▲ +60.7% |
| 1998 | 44.80x | $22.40 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +82.9% |
| 1997 | 24.50x | $24.50 Million | $1.00 Million | ▲ +17.8% |
| 1996 | 20.80x | $20.80 Million | $1.00 Million | ▲ +66.4% |
| 1995 | 12.50x | $15.00 Million | $1.20 Million | ▲ +13850.0% |
| 1994 | -0.09x | $-100.00K | $1.10 Million | — |