The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $346.50 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($11.57 Billion) in one year. Explore long-term investment intensity of The J. M. Smucker Company to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
The J. M. Smucker Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for The J. M. Smucker Company across 36 annual periods. Also explore total assets of The J. M. Smucker Company for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for The J. M. Smucker Company (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for The J. M. Smucker Company. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see SJM stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.11x | $1.21 Billion | $11.48 Billion | ▲ +7.9% |
| 2024 | 0.10x | $1.23 Billion | $12.58 Billion | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2023 | 0.15x | $1.19 Billion | $7.70 Billion | ▲ +7.5% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | $1.14 Billion | $7.91 Billion | ▼ -25.2% |
| 2021 | 0.19x | $1.56 Billion | $8.16 Billion | ▲ +34.2% |
| 2020 | 0.14x | $1.25 Billion | $8.78 Billion | ▲ +9.5% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $1.14 Billion | $8.74 Billion | ▼ -20.6% |
| 2018 | 0.16x | $1.22 Billion | $7.41 Billion | ▲ +36.4% |
| 2017 | 0.12x | $1.06 Billion | $8.79 Billion | ▼ -25.8% |
| 2016 | 0.16x | $1.46 Billion | $8.98 Billion | ▲ +115.4% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | $733.20 Million | $9.72 Billion | ▼ -64.5% |
| 2014 | 0.21x | $856.00 Million | $4.03 Billion | ▼ -3.6% |
| 2013 | 0.22x | $855.85 Million | $3.88 Billion | ▲ +19.2% |
| 2012 | 0.18x | $730.93 Million | $3.95 Billion | ▲ +43.2% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | $391.56 Million | $3.03 Billion | ▼ -52.1% |
| 2010 | 0.27x | $713.48 Million | $2.65 Billion | ▲ +97.0% |
| 2009 | 0.14x | $444.83 Million | $3.25 Billion | ▼ -5.0% |
| 2008 | 0.14x | $191.58 Million | $1.33 Billion | ▼ -52.7% |
| 2007 | 0.30x | $273.42 Million | $898.17 Million | ▲ +41.5% |
| 2006 | 0.22x | $198.28 Million | $921.68 Million | ▲ +4.6% |
| 2005 | 0.21x | $194.40 Million | $945.09 Million | ▼ -22.7% |
| 2004 | 0.27x | $125.94 Million | $473.43 Million | ▼ -21.3% |
| 2003 | 0.34x | $165.97 Million | $491.24 Million | ▲ +23.4% |
| 2002 | 0.27x | $67.00 Million | $244.75 Million | ▼ -29.1% |
| 2001 | 0.39x | $88.20 Million | $228.32 Million | ▲ +80.6% |
| 2000 | 0.21x | $33.60 Million | $157.09 Million | ▼ -47.9% |
| 1999 | 0.41x | $43.52 Million | $106.11 Million | ▼ -31.6% |
| 1998 | 0.60x | $61.04 Million | $101.77 Million | ▼ -3.3% |
| 1997 | 0.62x | $57.60 Million | $92.90 Million | ▲ +85.5% |
| 1996 | 0.33x | $49.70 Million | $148.70 Million | ▲ +39.4% |
| 1995 | 0.24x | $39.08 Million | $163.00 Million | ▼ -37.3% |
| 1994 | 0.38x | $55.17 Million | $144.24 Million | ▼ -49.4% |
| 1993 | 0.76x | $56.20 Million | $74.30 Million | ▲ +19.9% |
| 1992 | 0.63x | $41.40 Million | $65.60 Million | ▲ +18.2% |
| 1991 | 0.53x | $33.20 Million | $62.20 Million | ▲ +11.2% |
| 1990 | 0.48x | $27.70 Million | $57.70 Million | — |