Source Capital Closed Fund (SOR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Source Capital Closed Fund (SOR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -15.82x as of June 2022, meaning its operating cash flow of $-37.06 Million could theoretically repay -16% of its total liabilities ($2.34 Million) in one year. See Source Capital Closed Fund financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Source Capital Closed Fund Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2021)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Source Capital Closed Fund across 27 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Source Capital Closed Fund generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Source Capital Closed Fund (1995–2021)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Source Capital Closed Fund. Check Source Capital Closed Fund (SOR) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 6.79x | $41.48 Million | $6.11 Million | ▲ +173.2% |
| 2020 | 2.49x | $21.17 Million | $8.52 Million | ▼ -66.3% |
| 2019 | 7.39x | $65.71 Million | $8.90 Million | ▲ +205.1% |
| 2018 | -7.03x | $-27.77 Million | $3.95 Million | ▼ -113.6% |
| 2017 | 51.71x | $48.71 Million | $941.92K | ▲ +301.0% |
| 2016 | 12.90x | $27.87 Million | $2.16 Million | ▲ +352.3% |
| 2015 | -5.11x | $-29.16 Million | $5.71 Million | ▼ -102.2% |
| 2014 | 228.06x | $92.62 Million | $406.11K | ▼ -44.8% |
| 2013 | 413.42x | $154.80 Million | $374.44K | ▲ +800.0% |
| 2012 | 45.94x | $73.50 Million | $1.60 Million | ▲ +201.2% |
| 2011 | -45.40x | $-22.70 Million | $500.00K | ▼ -144.2% |
| 2010 | 102.73x | $113.00 Million | $1.10 Million | ▼ -67.6% |
| 2009 | 316.80x | $158.40 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +170.2% |
| 2008 | -451.60x | $-225.80 Million | $500.00K | ▼ -800.2% |
| 2007 | 64.50x | $38.70 Million | $600.00K | ▲ +38.2% |
| 2006 | 46.67x | $28.00 Million | $600.00K | ▼ -65.2% |
| 2005 | 134.00x | $80.40 Million | $600.00K | ▼ -12.8% |
| 2004 | 153.67x | $92.20 Million | $600.00K | ▼ -50.1% |
| 2003 | 308.20x | $154.10 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +772.9% |
| 2002 | -45.80x | $-68.70 Million | $1.50 Million | ▼ -124.0% |
| 2001 | 190.80x | $95.40 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +198.1% |
| 2000 | 64.00x | $38.40 Million | $600.00K | ▼ -61.6% |
| 1999 | 166.80x | $83.40 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +239.0% |
| 1998 | 49.20x | $24.60 Million | $500.00K | ▼ -70.9% |
| 1997 | 169.20x | $84.60 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +95.9% |
| 1996 | 86.38x | $69.10 Million | $800.00K | ▼ -27.7% |
| 1995 | 119.40x | $59.70 Million | $500.00K | — |