Source Capital Closed Fund Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Source Capital Closed Fund cash flow-to-debt ratio. Source Capital Closed Fund (SOR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -15.82x as of June 2022, meaning its operating cash flow of $-37.06 Million could theoretically repay -16% of its total liabilities ($2.34 Million) in one year. Check Source Capital Closed Fund (SOR) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Source Capital Closed Fund (1995–2021)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Source Capital Closed Fund from 1995 to 2021. Historical debt coverage capacity for Source Capital Closed Fund across 27 annual periods. Check Source Capital Closed Fund investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Source Capital Closed Fund Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2021)
Source Capital Closed Fund cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2021. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Source Capital Closed Fund. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Source Capital Closed Fund (SOR) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 6.79x | $41.48 Million | $6.11 Million | ▲ +173.2% |
| 2020 | 2.49x | $21.17 Million | $8.52 Million | ▼ -66.3% |
| 2019 | 7.39x | $65.71 Million | $8.90 Million | ▲ +205.1% |
| 2018 | -7.03x | $-27.77 Million | $3.95 Million | ▼ -113.6% |
| 2017 | 51.71x | $48.71 Million | $941.92K | ▲ +301.0% |
| 2016 | 12.90x | $27.87 Million | $2.16 Million | ▲ +352.3% |
| 2015 | -5.11x | $-29.16 Million | $5.71 Million | ▼ -102.2% |
| 2014 | 228.06x | $92.62 Million | $406.11K | ▼ -44.8% |
| 2013 | 413.42x | $154.80 Million | $374.44K | ▲ +800.0% |
| 2012 | 45.94x | $73.50 Million | $1.60 Million | ▲ +201.2% |
| 2011 | -45.40x | $-22.70 Million | $500.00K | ▼ -144.2% |
| 2010 | 102.73x | $113.00 Million | $1.10 Million | ▼ -67.6% |
| 2009 | 316.80x | $158.40 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +170.2% |
| 2008 | -451.60x | $-225.80 Million | $500.00K | ▼ -800.2% |
| 2007 | 64.50x | $38.70 Million | $600.00K | ▲ +38.2% |
| 2006 | 46.67x | $28.00 Million | $600.00K | ▼ -65.2% |
| 2005 | 134.00x | $80.40 Million | $600.00K | ▼ -12.8% |
| 2004 | 153.67x | $92.20 Million | $600.00K | ▼ -50.1% |
| 2003 | 308.20x | $154.10 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +772.9% |
| 2002 | -45.80x | $-68.70 Million | $1.50 Million | ▼ -124.0% |
| 2001 | 190.80x | $95.40 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +198.1% |
| 2000 | 64.00x | $38.40 Million | $600.00K | ▼ -61.6% |
| 1999 | 166.80x | $83.40 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +239.0% |
| 1998 | 49.20x | $24.60 Million | $500.00K | ▼ -70.9% |
| 1997 | 169.20x | $84.60 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +95.9% |
| 1996 | 86.38x | $69.10 Million | $800.00K | ▼ -27.7% |
| 1995 | 119.40x | $59.70 Million | $500.00K | — |