Transcontinental Realty Investors (TCI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Transcontinental Realty Investors (TCI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.94 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($262.32 Million) in one year. See how financially flexible is Transcontinental Realty Investors to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Transcontinental Realty Investors Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Transcontinental Realty Investors across 36 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see TCI operating cash flow.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Transcontinental Realty Investors (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Transcontinental Realty Investors. Check Transcontinental Realty Investors (TCI) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.01x | $-2.89 Million | $266.36 Million | ▼ -280.1% |
| 2024 | 0.01x | $1.31 Million | $217.73 Million | ▲ +103.8% |
| 2023 | -0.16x | $-31.07 Million | $196.09 Million | ▼ -31.8% |
| 2022 | -0.12x | $-45.39 Million | $377.55 Million | ▼ -356.2% |
| 2021 | -0.03x | $-10.99 Million | $416.80 Million | ▼ -342.3% |
| 2020 | 0.01x | $5.63 Million | $517.55 Million | ▲ +115.6% |
| 2019 | -0.07x | $-35.75 Million | $511.85 Million | ▲ +81.4% |
| 2018 | -0.38x | $-181.19 Million | $481.98 Million | ▼ -1179.0% |
| 2017 | -0.03x | $-32.48 Million | $1.11 Billion | ▼ -451.6% |
| 2016 | 0.01x | $8.04 Million | $961.44 Million | ▲ +114.5% |
| 2015 | -0.06x | $-50.92 Million | $885.15 Million | ▼ -36.5% |
| 2014 | -0.04x | $-29.38 Million | $696.96 Million | ▲ +55.4% |
| 2013 | -0.09x | $-66.69 Million | $706.10 Million | ▼ -308.0% |
| 2012 | -0.02x | $-21.12 Million | $912.22 Million | ▼ -460.8% |
| 2011 | 0.01x | $6.54 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▲ +193.7% |
| 2010 | -0.01x | $-8.27 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▲ +66.2% |
| 2009 | -0.02x | $-27.59 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▼ -230.5% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $20.41 Million | $1.32 Billion | ▲ +194.7% |
| 2007 | 0.01x | $6.50 Million | $1.23 Billion | ▼ -7.6% |
| 2006 | 0.01x | $5.51 Million | $968.07 Million | ▼ -71.5% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $16.69 Million | $836.66 Million | ▲ +202.3% |
| 2004 | -0.02x | $-13.22 Million | $678.03 Million | ▼ -448.8% |
| 2003 | 0.01x | $3.70 Million | $661.28 Million | ▲ +138.7% |
| 2002 | -0.01x | $-9.11 Million | $630.81 Million | ▼ -686.0% |
| 2001 | 0.00x | $-895.00K | $487.00 Million | ▲ +11.1% |
| 2000 | 0.00x | $-1.09 Million | $526.96 Million | ▼ -127.0% |
| 1999 | 0.01x | $4.09 Million | $535.08 Million | ▼ -34.9% |
| 1998 | 0.01x | $3.42 Million | $291.07 Million | ▲ +325.1% |
| 1997 | -0.01x | $-1.22 Million | $233.00 Million | ▲ +79.3% |
| 1996 | -0.03x | $-4.18 Million | $166.01 Million | ▼ -560.6% |
| 1995 | 0.01x | $934.00K | $171.00 Million | ▲ +342.9% |
| 1994 | 0.00x | $-348.00K | $154.79 Million | ▼ -121.5% |
| 1993 | 0.01x | $1.30 Million | $124.50 Million | ▼ -72.3% |
| 1992 | 0.04x | $3.70 Million | $98.10 Million | ▲ +59.5% |
| 1991 | 0.02x | $1.70 Million | $71.90 Million | ▲ +136.4% |
| 1990 | 0.01x | $600.00K | $60.00 Million | — |