Transcontinental Realty Investors (TCI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Transcontinental Realty Investors (TCI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.94 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($262.32 Million) in one year. Explore TCI long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Transcontinental Realty Investors Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Transcontinental Realty Investors across 36 annual periods. Also explore how large is Transcontinental Realty Investors's balance sheet for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Transcontinental Realty Investors (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Transcontinental Realty Investors. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Transcontinental Realty Investors.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.01x | $-2.89 Million | $266.36 Million | ▼ -280.1% |
| 2024 | 0.01x | $1.31 Million | $217.73 Million | ▲ +103.8% |
| 2023 | -0.16x | $-31.07 Million | $196.09 Million | ▼ -31.8% |
| 2022 | -0.12x | $-45.39 Million | $377.55 Million | ▼ -356.2% |
| 2021 | -0.03x | $-10.99 Million | $416.80 Million | ▼ -342.3% |
| 2020 | 0.01x | $5.63 Million | $517.55 Million | ▲ +115.6% |
| 2019 | -0.07x | $-35.75 Million | $511.85 Million | ▲ +81.4% |
| 2018 | -0.38x | $-181.19 Million | $481.98 Million | ▼ -1179.0% |
| 2017 | -0.03x | $-32.48 Million | $1.11 Billion | ▼ -451.6% |
| 2016 | 0.01x | $8.04 Million | $961.44 Million | ▲ +114.5% |
| 2015 | -0.06x | $-50.92 Million | $885.15 Million | ▼ -36.5% |
| 2014 | -0.04x | $-29.38 Million | $696.96 Million | ▲ +55.4% |
| 2013 | -0.09x | $-66.69 Million | $706.10 Million | ▼ -308.0% |
| 2012 | -0.02x | $-21.12 Million | $912.22 Million | ▼ -460.8% |
| 2011 | 0.01x | $6.54 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▲ +193.7% |
| 2010 | -0.01x | $-8.27 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▲ +66.2% |
| 2009 | -0.02x | $-27.59 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▼ -230.5% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $20.41 Million | $1.32 Billion | ▲ +194.7% |
| 2007 | 0.01x | $6.50 Million | $1.23 Billion | ▼ -7.6% |
| 2006 | 0.01x | $5.51 Million | $968.07 Million | ▼ -71.5% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $16.69 Million | $836.66 Million | ▲ +202.3% |
| 2004 | -0.02x | $-13.22 Million | $678.03 Million | ▼ -448.8% |
| 2003 | 0.01x | $3.70 Million | $661.28 Million | ▲ +138.7% |
| 2002 | -0.01x | $-9.11 Million | $630.81 Million | ▼ -686.0% |
| 2001 | 0.00x | $-895.00K | $487.00 Million | ▲ +11.1% |
| 2000 | 0.00x | $-1.09 Million | $526.96 Million | ▼ -127.0% |
| 1999 | 0.01x | $4.09 Million | $535.08 Million | ▼ -34.9% |
| 1998 | 0.01x | $3.42 Million | $291.07 Million | ▲ +325.1% |
| 1997 | -0.01x | $-1.22 Million | $233.00 Million | ▲ +79.3% |
| 1996 | -0.03x | $-4.18 Million | $166.01 Million | ▼ -560.6% |
| 1995 | 0.01x | $934.00K | $171.00 Million | ▲ +342.9% |
| 1994 | 0.00x | $-348.00K | $154.79 Million | ▼ -121.5% |
| 1993 | 0.01x | $1.30 Million | $124.50 Million | ▼ -72.3% |
| 1992 | 0.04x | $3.70 Million | $98.10 Million | ▲ +59.5% |
| 1991 | 0.02x | $1.70 Million | $71.90 Million | ▲ +136.4% |
| 1990 | 0.01x | $600.00K | $60.00 Million | — |