Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $97.18 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.29 Billion) in one year. See TEN financial flexibility score to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see TEN operating cash flow.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited. Check TEN cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.14x | $295.79 Million | $2.09 Billion | ▼ -10.8% |
| 2024 | 0.16x | $307.68 Million | $1.94 Billion | ▼ -31.3% |
| 2023 | 0.23x | $395.28 Million | $1.71 Billion | ▲ +42.9% |
| 2022 | 0.16x | $288.53 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▲ +387.7% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | $53.11 Million | $1.60 Billion | ▼ -72.1% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $205.42 Million | $1.73 Billion | ▲ +8.3% |
| 2019 | 0.11x | $184.35 Million | $1.68 Billion | ▲ +167.3% |
| 2018 | 0.04x | $69.64 Million | $1.70 Billion | ▼ -54.4% |
| 2017 | 0.09x | $167.65 Million | $1.87 Billion | ▼ -1.9% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | $170.35 Million | $1.86 Billion | ▼ -73.7% |
| 2015 | 0.35x | $517.00 Million | $1.49 Billion | ▲ +55.2% |
| 2014 | 0.22x | $341.00 Million | $1.52 Billion | ▼ -33.8% |
| 2013 | 0.34x | $503.00 Million | $1.49 Billion | ▲ +41.3% |
| 2012 | 0.24x | $365.00 Million | $1.52 Billion | ▲ +58.0% |
| 2011 | 0.15x | $245.00 Million | $1.62 Billion | ▲ +4.5% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | $244.00 Million | $1.68 Billion | ▲ +102.4% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | $117.16 Million | $1.64 Billion | ▼ -24.5% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | $160.00 Million | $1.69 Billion | ▼ -13.5% |
| 2007 | 0.11x | $165.00 Million | $1.50 Billion | ▼ -33.1% |
| 2006 | 0.16x | $199.00 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▼ -41.1% |
| 2005 | 0.28x | $134.00 Million | $481.99 Million | ▼ -41.7% |
| 2004 | 0.48x | $200.00 Million | $419.45 Million | ▲ +360.5% |
| 2003 | 0.10x | $281.00 Million | $2.71 Billion | ▲ +42.0% |
| 2002 | 0.07x | $188.00 Million | $2.58 Billion | ▲ +34.0% |
| 2001 | 0.05x | $141.00 Million | $2.59 Billion | ▼ -40.9% |
| 2000 | 0.09x | $234.00 Million | $2.54 Billion | ▲ +190.8% |
| 1999 | -0.10x | $-254.00 Million | $2.50 Billion | ▼ -211.8% |
| 1998 | 0.09x | $532.00 Million | $5.87 Billion | ▼ -6.0% |
| 1997 | 0.10x | $519.00 Million | $5.38 Billion | ▲ +76.8% |
| 1996 | 0.05x | $253.00 Million | $4.64 Billion | — |