Tredegar Corporation (TG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tredegar Corporation (TG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.95 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($179.85 Million) in one year. Explore TG long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tredegar Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1987–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tredegar Corporation across 39 annual periods. Also explore Tredegar Corporation assets under control for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tredegar Corporation (1987–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tredegar Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Tredegar Corporation (TG) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.21x | $32.98 Million | $154.82 Million | ▲ +46.5% |
| 2024 | 0.15x | $25.51 Million | $175.39 Million | ▲ +76.3% |
| 2023 | 0.08x | $24.00 Million | $290.81 Million | ▲ +234.7% |
| 2022 | -0.06x | $-20.84 Million | $340.33 Million | ▼ -129.4% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | $70.58 Million | $338.86 Million | ▲ +13.7% |
| 2020 | 0.18x | $74.37 Million | $405.81 Million | ▼ -46.9% |
| 2019 | 0.34x | $115.86 Million | $335.92 Million | ▲ +24.3% |
| 2018 | 0.28x | $97.79 Million | $352.52 Million | ▲ +29.6% |
| 2017 | 0.21x | $88.22 Million | $411.96 Million | ▲ +49.1% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $48.87 Million | $340.38 Million | ▼ -32.2% |
| 2015 | 0.21x | $74.26 Million | $350.51 Million | ▲ +72.3% |
| 2014 | 0.12x | $51.23 Million | $416.60 Million | ▼ -37.4% |
| 2013 | 0.20x | $76.72 Million | $390.34 Million | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2012 | 0.20x | $82.59 Million | $410.91 Million | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2011 | 0.19x | $71.77 Million | $381.59 Million | ▼ -34.0% |
| 2010 | 0.29x | $46.41 Million | $162.80 Million | ▼ -53.8% |
| 2009 | 0.62x | $103.22 Million | $167.21 Million | ▲ +55.7% |
| 2008 | 0.40x | $75.41 Million | $190.22 Million | ▲ +21.6% |
| 2007 | 0.33x | $95.55 Million | $293.15 Million | ▼ -17.4% |
| 2006 | 0.39x | $104.61 Million | $265.19 Million | ▲ +117.7% |
| 2005 | 0.18x | $53.70 Million | $296.40 Million | ▼ -44.2% |
| 2004 | 0.32x | $93.82 Million | $289.03 Million | ▲ +29.9% |
| 2003 | 0.25x | $76.38 Million | $305.63 Million | ▲ +43.6% |
| 2002 | 0.17x | $65.27 Million | $375.03 Million | ▼ -10.1% |
| 2001 | 0.19x | $74.91 Million | $387.13 Million | ▲ +264.2% |
| 2000 | 0.05x | $21.58 Million | $406.04 Million | ▼ -75.7% |
| 1999 | 0.22x | $92.00 Million | $420.30 Million | ▼ -54.6% |
| 1998 | 0.48x | $70.80 Million | $146.90 Million | ▲ +0.6% |
| 1997 | 0.48x | $66.30 Million | $138.40 Million | ▲ +36.0% |
| 1996 | 0.35x | $45.30 Million | $128.60 Million | ▲ +2.0% |
| 1995 | 0.35x | $49.60 Million | $143.60 Million | ▲ +19.0% |
| 1994 | 0.29x | $42.50 Million | $146.40 Million | ▲ +157.2% |
| 1993 | 0.11x | $20.80 Million | $184.30 Million | ▼ -29.5% |
| 1992 | 0.16x | $31.50 Million | $196.70 Million | ▼ -27.3% |
| 1991 | 0.22x | $41.50 Million | $188.40 Million | ▲ +24.1% |
| 1990 | 0.18x | $34.60 Million | $194.90 Million | ▼ -31.0% |
| 1989 | 0.26x | $47.00 Million | $182.70 Million | ▼ -78.9% |
| 1988 | 1.22x | $81.90 Million | $67.10 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1987 | 1.22x | $81.90 Million | $67.10 Million | — |