Tredegar Corporation (TG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tredegar Corporation (TG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.95 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($179.85 Million) in one year. See Tredegar Corporation (TG) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tredegar Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1987–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tredegar Corporation across 39 annual periods. Also explore Tredegar Corporation net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tredegar Corporation (1987–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tredegar Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Tredegar Corporation worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.21x | $32.98 Million | $154.82 Million | ▲ +46.5% |
| 2024 | 0.15x | $25.51 Million | $175.39 Million | ▲ +76.3% |
| 2023 | 0.08x | $24.00 Million | $290.81 Million | ▲ +234.7% |
| 2022 | -0.06x | $-20.84 Million | $340.33 Million | ▼ -129.4% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | $70.58 Million | $338.86 Million | ▲ +13.7% |
| 2020 | 0.18x | $74.37 Million | $405.81 Million | ▼ -46.9% |
| 2019 | 0.34x | $115.86 Million | $335.92 Million | ▲ +24.3% |
| 2018 | 0.28x | $97.79 Million | $352.52 Million | ▲ +29.6% |
| 2017 | 0.21x | $88.22 Million | $411.96 Million | ▲ +49.1% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $48.87 Million | $340.38 Million | ▼ -32.2% |
| 2015 | 0.21x | $74.26 Million | $350.51 Million | ▲ +72.3% |
| 2014 | 0.12x | $51.23 Million | $416.60 Million | ▼ -37.4% |
| 2013 | 0.20x | $76.72 Million | $390.34 Million | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2012 | 0.20x | $82.59 Million | $410.91 Million | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2011 | 0.19x | $71.77 Million | $381.59 Million | ▼ -34.0% |
| 2010 | 0.29x | $46.41 Million | $162.80 Million | ▼ -53.8% |
| 2009 | 0.62x | $103.22 Million | $167.21 Million | ▲ +55.7% |
| 2008 | 0.40x | $75.41 Million | $190.22 Million | ▲ +21.6% |
| 2007 | 0.33x | $95.55 Million | $293.15 Million | ▼ -17.4% |
| 2006 | 0.39x | $104.61 Million | $265.19 Million | ▲ +117.7% |
| 2005 | 0.18x | $53.70 Million | $296.40 Million | ▼ -44.2% |
| 2004 | 0.32x | $93.82 Million | $289.03 Million | ▲ +29.9% |
| 2003 | 0.25x | $76.38 Million | $305.63 Million | ▲ +43.6% |
| 2002 | 0.17x | $65.27 Million | $375.03 Million | ▼ -10.1% |
| 2001 | 0.19x | $74.91 Million | $387.13 Million | ▲ +264.2% |
| 2000 | 0.05x | $21.58 Million | $406.04 Million | ▼ -75.7% |
| 1999 | 0.22x | $92.00 Million | $420.30 Million | ▼ -54.6% |
| 1998 | 0.48x | $70.80 Million | $146.90 Million | ▲ +0.6% |
| 1997 | 0.48x | $66.30 Million | $138.40 Million | ▲ +36.0% |
| 1996 | 0.35x | $45.30 Million | $128.60 Million | ▲ +2.0% |
| 1995 | 0.35x | $49.60 Million | $143.60 Million | ▲ +19.0% |
| 1994 | 0.29x | $42.50 Million | $146.40 Million | ▲ +157.2% |
| 1993 | 0.11x | $20.80 Million | $184.30 Million | ▼ -29.5% |
| 1992 | 0.16x | $31.50 Million | $196.70 Million | ▼ -27.3% |
| 1991 | 0.22x | $41.50 Million | $188.40 Million | ▲ +24.1% |
| 1990 | 0.18x | $34.60 Million | $194.90 Million | ▼ -31.0% |
| 1989 | 0.26x | $47.00 Million | $182.70 Million | ▼ -78.9% |
| 1988 | 1.22x | $81.90 Million | $67.10 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1987 | 1.22x | $81.90 Million | $67.10 Million | — |