Tredegar Corporation (TG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tredegar Corporation (TG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.95 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($179.85 Million) in one year. See TG FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tredegar Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1987–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tredegar Corporation across 39 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Tredegar Corporation (TG) cash conversion ratio.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tredegar Corporation (1987–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tredegar Corporation. Check how high is Tredegar Corporation's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.21x | $32.98 Million | $154.82 Million | ▲ +46.5% |
| 2024 | 0.15x | $25.51 Million | $175.39 Million | ▲ +76.3% |
| 2023 | 0.08x | $24.00 Million | $290.81 Million | ▲ +234.7% |
| 2022 | -0.06x | $-20.84 Million | $340.33 Million | ▼ -129.4% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | $70.58 Million | $338.86 Million | ▲ +13.7% |
| 2020 | 0.18x | $74.37 Million | $405.81 Million | ▼ -46.9% |
| 2019 | 0.34x | $115.86 Million | $335.92 Million | ▲ +24.3% |
| 2018 | 0.28x | $97.79 Million | $352.52 Million | ▲ +29.6% |
| 2017 | 0.21x | $88.22 Million | $411.96 Million | ▲ +49.1% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $48.87 Million | $340.38 Million | ▼ -32.2% |
| 2015 | 0.21x | $74.26 Million | $350.51 Million | ▲ +72.3% |
| 2014 | 0.12x | $51.23 Million | $416.60 Million | ▼ -37.4% |
| 2013 | 0.20x | $76.72 Million | $390.34 Million | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2012 | 0.20x | $82.59 Million | $410.91 Million | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2011 | 0.19x | $71.77 Million | $381.59 Million | ▼ -34.0% |
| 2010 | 0.29x | $46.41 Million | $162.80 Million | ▼ -53.8% |
| 2009 | 0.62x | $103.22 Million | $167.21 Million | ▲ +55.7% |
| 2008 | 0.40x | $75.41 Million | $190.22 Million | ▲ +21.6% |
| 2007 | 0.33x | $95.55 Million | $293.15 Million | ▼ -17.4% |
| 2006 | 0.39x | $104.61 Million | $265.19 Million | ▲ +117.7% |
| 2005 | 0.18x | $53.70 Million | $296.40 Million | ▼ -44.2% |
| 2004 | 0.32x | $93.82 Million | $289.03 Million | ▲ +29.9% |
| 2003 | 0.25x | $76.38 Million | $305.63 Million | ▲ +43.6% |
| 2002 | 0.17x | $65.27 Million | $375.03 Million | ▼ -10.1% |
| 2001 | 0.19x | $74.91 Million | $387.13 Million | ▲ +264.2% |
| 2000 | 0.05x | $21.58 Million | $406.04 Million | ▼ -75.7% |
| 1999 | 0.22x | $92.00 Million | $420.30 Million | ▼ -54.6% |
| 1998 | 0.48x | $70.80 Million | $146.90 Million | ▲ +0.6% |
| 1997 | 0.48x | $66.30 Million | $138.40 Million | ▲ +36.0% |
| 1996 | 0.35x | $45.30 Million | $128.60 Million | ▲ +2.0% |
| 1995 | 0.35x | $49.60 Million | $143.60 Million | ▲ +19.0% |
| 1994 | 0.29x | $42.50 Million | $146.40 Million | ▲ +157.2% |
| 1993 | 0.11x | $20.80 Million | $184.30 Million | ▼ -29.5% |
| 1992 | 0.16x | $31.50 Million | $196.70 Million | ▼ -27.3% |
| 1991 | 0.22x | $41.50 Million | $188.40 Million | ▲ +24.1% |
| 1990 | 0.18x | $34.60 Million | $194.90 Million | ▼ -31.0% |
| 1989 | 0.26x | $47.00 Million | $182.70 Million | ▼ -78.9% |
| 1988 | 1.22x | $81.90 Million | $67.10 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1987 | 1.22x | $81.90 Million | $67.10 Million | — |