Tredegar Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tredegar Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Tredegar Corporation (TG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.95 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($179.85 Million) in one year. Check Tredegar Corporation (TG) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Tredegar Corporation (1987–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Tredegar Corporation from 1987 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Tredegar Corporation across 39 annual periods. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of Tredegar Corporation to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Tredegar Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1987–2025)
Tredegar Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1987 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tredegar Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see TG operating cash flow.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.21x | $32.98 Million | $154.82 Million | ▲ +46.5% |
| 2024 | 0.15x | $25.51 Million | $175.39 Million | ▲ +76.3% |
| 2023 | 0.08x | $24.00 Million | $290.81 Million | ▲ +234.7% |
| 2022 | -0.06x | $-20.84 Million | $340.33 Million | ▼ -129.4% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | $70.58 Million | $338.86 Million | ▲ +13.7% |
| 2020 | 0.18x | $74.37 Million | $405.81 Million | ▼ -46.9% |
| 2019 | 0.34x | $115.86 Million | $335.92 Million | ▲ +24.3% |
| 2018 | 0.28x | $97.79 Million | $352.52 Million | ▲ +29.6% |
| 2017 | 0.21x | $88.22 Million | $411.96 Million | ▲ +49.1% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $48.87 Million | $340.38 Million | ▼ -32.2% |
| 2015 | 0.21x | $74.26 Million | $350.51 Million | ▲ +72.3% |
| 2014 | 0.12x | $51.23 Million | $416.60 Million | ▼ -37.4% |
| 2013 | 0.20x | $76.72 Million | $390.34 Million | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2012 | 0.20x | $82.59 Million | $410.91 Million | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2011 | 0.19x | $71.77 Million | $381.59 Million | ▼ -34.0% |
| 2010 | 0.29x | $46.41 Million | $162.80 Million | ▼ -53.8% |
| 2009 | 0.62x | $103.22 Million | $167.21 Million | ▲ +55.7% |
| 2008 | 0.40x | $75.41 Million | $190.22 Million | ▲ +21.6% |
| 2007 | 0.33x | $95.55 Million | $293.15 Million | ▼ -17.4% |
| 2006 | 0.39x | $104.61 Million | $265.19 Million | ▲ +117.7% |
| 2005 | 0.18x | $53.70 Million | $296.40 Million | ▼ -44.2% |
| 2004 | 0.32x | $93.82 Million | $289.03 Million | ▲ +29.9% |
| 2003 | 0.25x | $76.38 Million | $305.63 Million | ▲ +43.6% |
| 2002 | 0.17x | $65.27 Million | $375.03 Million | ▼ -10.1% |
| 2001 | 0.19x | $74.91 Million | $387.13 Million | ▲ +264.2% |
| 2000 | 0.05x | $21.58 Million | $406.04 Million | ▼ -75.7% |
| 1999 | 0.22x | $92.00 Million | $420.30 Million | ▼ -54.6% |
| 1998 | 0.48x | $70.80 Million | $146.90 Million | ▲ +0.6% |
| 1997 | 0.48x | $66.30 Million | $138.40 Million | ▲ +36.0% |
| 1996 | 0.35x | $45.30 Million | $128.60 Million | ▲ +2.0% |
| 1995 | 0.35x | $49.60 Million | $143.60 Million | ▲ +19.0% |
| 1994 | 0.29x | $42.50 Million | $146.40 Million | ▲ +157.2% |
| 1993 | 0.11x | $20.80 Million | $184.30 Million | ▼ -29.5% |
| 1992 | 0.16x | $31.50 Million | $196.70 Million | ▼ -27.3% |
| 1991 | 0.22x | $41.50 Million | $188.40 Million | ▲ +24.1% |
| 1990 | 0.18x | $34.60 Million | $194.90 Million | ▼ -31.0% |
| 1989 | 0.26x | $47.00 Million | $182.70 Million | ▼ -78.9% |
| 1988 | 1.22x | $81.90 Million | $67.10 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1987 | 1.22x | $81.90 Million | $67.10 Million | — |