Texas Pacific Land Trust (TPL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Texas Pacific Land Trust (TPL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.99x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $154.61 Million could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities ($156.95 Million) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Texas Pacific Land Trust to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Texas Pacific Land Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Texas Pacific Land Trust across 30 annual periods. Also explore TPL net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Texas Pacific Land Trust (1995–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Texas Pacific Land Trust. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Texas Pacific Land Trust.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4.25x | $490.67 Million | $115.56 Million | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2023 | 3.70x | $418.29 Million | $113.20 Million | ▼ -13.6% |
| 2022 | 4.28x | $447.15 Million | $104.54 Million | ▲ +81.2% |
| 2021 | 2.36x | $265.16 Million | $112.35 Million | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2020 | 2.39x | $207.04 Million | $86.45 Million | ▼ -39.9% |
| 2019 | 3.98x | $342.79 Million | $86.04 Million | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2018 | 4.84x | $195.45 Million | $40.38 Million | ▲ +149.0% |
| 2017 | 1.94x | $93.83 Million | $48.27 Million | ▼ -29.6% |
| 2016 | 2.76x | $40.96 Million | $14.83 Million | ▼ -73.5% |
| 2015 | 10.44x | $49.57 Million | $4.75 Million | ▲ +71.5% |
| 2014 | 6.09x | $38.85 Million | $6.38 Million | ▼ -10.4% |
| 2013 | 6.79x | $30.07 Million | $4.43 Million | ▲ +90.7% |
| 2012 | 3.56x | $19.91 Million | $5.59 Million | ▲ +2.5% |
| 2011 | 3.48x | $23.93 Million | $6.89 Million | ▲ +98.7% |
| 2010 | 1.75x | $11.70 Million | $6.69 Million | ▲ +31.9% |
| 2009 | 1.33x | $9.39 Million | $7.08 Million | ▼ -15.9% |
| 2008 | 1.58x | $11.44 Million | $7.26 Million | ▲ +28.4% |
| 2007 | 1.23x | $9.53 Million | $7.77 Million | ▼ -4.9% |
| 2006 | 1.29x | $10.37 Million | $8.03 Million | ▼ -3.9% |
| 2005 | 1.34x | $10.33 Million | $7.69 Million | ▲ +11.6% |
| 2004 | 1.20x | $10.16 Million | $8.44 Million | ▼ -20.0% |
| 2003 | 1.50x | $6.52 Million | $4.33 Million | ▲ +45.3% |
| 2002 | 1.04x | $4.92 Million | $4.75 Million | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2001 | 1.37x | $6.07 Million | $4.43 Million | ▲ +38.2% |
| 2000 | 0.99x | $4.02 Million | $4.06 Million | ▼ -1.4% |
| 1999 | 1.00x | $4.15 Million | $4.13 Million | ▼ -1.9% |
| 1998 | 1.02x | $5.34 Million | $5.21 Million | ▼ -4.9% |
| 1997 | 1.08x | $4.79 Million | $4.45 Million | ▲ +17.1% |
| 1996 | 0.92x | $3.29 Million | $3.58 Million | ▼ -29.7% |
| 1995 | 1.31x | $4.71 Million | $3.61 Million | — |