Tejon Ranch Co (TRC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tejon Ranch Co (TRC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $10.24 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($139.91 Million) in one year. See Tejon Ranch Co free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tejon Ranch Co Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1985–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tejon Ranch Co across 40 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Tejon Ranch Co to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tejon Ranch Co (1985–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tejon Ranch Co. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Tejon Ranch Co market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.04x | $6.13 Million | $139.91 Million | ▼ -63.6% |
| 2024 | 0.12x | $14.31 Million | $119.04 Million | ▼ -16.8% |
| 2023 | 0.14x | $13.65 Million | $94.43 Million | ▲ +51.2% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | $8.53 Million | $89.20 Million | ▲ +204.1% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | $2.82 Million | $89.53 Million | ▼ -81.5% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | $15.48 Million | $91.02 Million | ▼ -0.6% |
| 2019 | 0.17x | $16.05 Million | $93.80 Million | ▲ +12.5% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | $14.35 Million | $94.38 Million | ▲ +41.4% |
| 2017 | 0.11x | $9.83 Million | $91.39 Million | ▲ +102.7% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | $5.58 Million | $105.23 Million | ▼ -68.5% |
| 2015 | 0.17x | $16.97 Million | $100.61 Million | ▲ +37.5% |
| 2014 | 0.12x | $13.22 Million | $107.78 Million | ▼ -70.8% |
| 2013 | 0.42x | $9.54 Million | $22.69 Million | ▼ -41.6% |
| 2012 | 0.72x | $14.09 Million | $19.60 Million | ▲ +63.3% |
| 2011 | 0.44x | $9.48 Million | $21.54 Million | ▲ +57.5% |
| 2010 | 0.28x | $3.20 Million | $11.44 Million | ▲ +318.4% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | $1.36 Million | $20.36 Million | ▼ -78.7% |
| 2008 | 0.31x | $4.31 Million | $13.77 Million | ▼ -59.9% |
| 2007 | 0.78x | $8.16 Million | $10.45 Million | ▲ +259.8% |
| 2006 | 0.22x | $2.19 Million | $10.09 Million | ▼ -69.3% |
| 2005 | 0.71x | $6.34 Million | $8.96 Million | ▼ -13.4% |
| 2004 | 0.82x | $4.99 Million | $6.11 Million | ▲ +40189.2% |
| 2003 | 0.00x | $52.00K | $25.66 Million | ▼ -98.9% |
| 2002 | 0.18x | $4.75 Million | $26.60 Million | ▲ +115.0% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $2.19 Million | $26.34 Million | ▲ +236.6% |
| 2000 | 0.02x | $1.37 Million | $55.31 Million | ▲ +1292.8% |
| 1999 | 0.00x | $-100.00K | $48.30 Million | ▲ +94.3% |
| 1998 | -0.04x | $-1.10 Million | $30.30 Million | ▲ +85.7% |
| 1997 | -0.25x | $-5.90 Million | $23.20 Million | ▼ -194.9% |
| 1996 | 0.27x | $2.60 Million | $9.70 Million | ▲ +283.2% |
| 1995 | -0.15x | $-1.20 Million | $8.20 Million | ▼ -165.9% |
| 1994 | 0.22x | $1.80 Million | $8.10 Million | ▼ -30.1% |
| 1993 | 0.32x | $3.40 Million | $10.70 Million | ▲ +7.1% |
| 1992 | 0.30x | $3.50 Million | $11.80 Million | ▲ +3548.3% |
| 1991 | 0.01x | $100.00K | $12.30 Million | ▼ -96.9% |
| 1990 | 0.26x | $3.40 Million | $12.90 Million | ▼ -0.2% |
| 1989 | 0.26x | $3.30 Million | $12.50 Million | ▼ -70.8% |
| 1988 | 0.91x | $11.50 Million | $12.70 Million | ▲ +1069.6% |
| 1986 | 0.08x | $1.20 Million | $15.50 Million | ▼ -36.0% |
| 1985 | 0.12x | $2.20 Million | $18.20 Million | — |