Tejon Ranch Co Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tejon Ranch Co cash flow-to-debt ratio. Tejon Ranch Co (TRC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.30 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($146.62 Million) in one year. Check cash flow quality index of Tejon Ranch Co to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Tejon Ranch Co (1985–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Tejon Ranch Co from 1985 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Tejon Ranch Co across 40 annual periods. Check TRC total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Tejon Ranch Co Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1985–2025)
Tejon Ranch Co cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1985 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tejon Ranch Co. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Tejon Ranch Co (TRC) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.04x | $6.13 Million | $139.91 Million | ▼ -63.6% |
| 2024 | 0.12x | $14.31 Million | $119.04 Million | ▼ -16.8% |
| 2023 | 0.14x | $13.65 Million | $94.43 Million | ▲ +51.2% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | $8.53 Million | $89.20 Million | ▲ +204.1% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | $2.82 Million | $89.53 Million | ▼ -81.5% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | $15.48 Million | $91.02 Million | ▼ -0.6% |
| 2019 | 0.17x | $16.05 Million | $93.80 Million | ▲ +12.5% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | $14.35 Million | $94.38 Million | ▲ +41.4% |
| 2017 | 0.11x | $9.83 Million | $91.39 Million | ▲ +102.7% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | $5.58 Million | $105.23 Million | ▼ -68.5% |
| 2015 | 0.17x | $16.97 Million | $100.61 Million | ▲ +37.5% |
| 2014 | 0.12x | $13.22 Million | $107.78 Million | ▼ -70.8% |
| 2013 | 0.42x | $9.54 Million | $22.69 Million | ▼ -41.6% |
| 2012 | 0.72x | $14.09 Million | $19.60 Million | ▲ +63.3% |
| 2011 | 0.44x | $9.48 Million | $21.54 Million | ▲ +57.5% |
| 2010 | 0.28x | $3.20 Million | $11.44 Million | ▲ +318.4% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | $1.36 Million | $20.36 Million | ▼ -78.7% |
| 2008 | 0.31x | $4.31 Million | $13.77 Million | ▼ -59.9% |
| 2007 | 0.78x | $8.16 Million | $10.45 Million | ▲ +259.8% |
| 2006 | 0.22x | $2.19 Million | $10.09 Million | ▼ -69.3% |
| 2005 | 0.71x | $6.34 Million | $8.96 Million | ▼ -13.4% |
| 2004 | 0.82x | $4.99 Million | $6.11 Million | ▲ +40189.2% |
| 2003 | 0.00x | $52.00K | $25.66 Million | ▼ -98.9% |
| 2002 | 0.18x | $4.75 Million | $26.60 Million | ▲ +115.0% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $2.19 Million | $26.34 Million | ▲ +236.6% |
| 2000 | 0.02x | $1.37 Million | $55.31 Million | ▲ +1292.8% |
| 1999 | 0.00x | $-100.00K | $48.30 Million | ▲ +94.3% |
| 1998 | -0.04x | $-1.10 Million | $30.30 Million | ▲ +85.7% |
| 1997 | -0.25x | $-5.90 Million | $23.20 Million | ▼ -194.9% |
| 1996 | 0.27x | $2.60 Million | $9.70 Million | ▲ +283.2% |
| 1995 | -0.15x | $-1.20 Million | $8.20 Million | ▼ -165.9% |
| 1994 | 0.22x | $1.80 Million | $8.10 Million | ▼ -30.1% |
| 1993 | 0.32x | $3.40 Million | $10.70 Million | ▲ +7.1% |
| 1992 | 0.30x | $3.50 Million | $11.80 Million | ▲ +3548.3% |
| 1991 | 0.01x | $100.00K | $12.30 Million | ▼ -96.9% |
| 1990 | 0.26x | $3.40 Million | $12.90 Million | ▼ -0.2% |
| 1989 | 0.26x | $3.30 Million | $12.50 Million | ▼ -70.8% |
| 1988 | 0.91x | $11.50 Million | $12.70 Million | ▲ +1069.6% |
| 1986 | 0.08x | $1.20 Million | $15.50 Million | ▼ -36.0% |
| 1985 | 0.12x | $2.20 Million | $18.20 Million | — |