Tyler Technologies Inc (TYL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tyler Technologies Inc (TYL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $107.26 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.24 Billion) in one year. See financial flexibility index of Tyler Technologies Inc to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tyler Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tyler Technologies Inc across 36 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Tyler Technologies Inc operating cash flow efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tyler Technologies Inc (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tyler Technologies Inc. Check Tyler Technologies Inc cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.34x | $653.54 Million | $1.94 Billion | ▼ -3.2% |
| 2024 | 0.35x | $624.63 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▲ +59.3% |
| 2023 | 0.22x | $380.44 Million | $1.74 Billion | ▲ +18.3% |
| 2022 | 0.18x | $381.45 Million | $2.06 Billion | ▲ +19.8% |
| 2021 | 0.15x | $371.75 Million | $2.41 Billion | ▼ -73.0% |
| 2020 | 0.57x | $355.09 Million | $621.16 Million | ▲ +28.9% |
| 2019 | 0.44x | $254.72 Million | $574.56 Million | ▼ -17.4% |
| 2018 | 0.54x | $250.20 Million | $466.12 Million | ▲ +15.9% |
| 2017 | 0.46x | $195.75 Million | $422.50 Million | ▲ +6.8% |
| 2016 | 0.43x | $191.86 Million | $442.42 Million | ▲ +142.5% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | $89.01 Million | $497.71 Million | ▼ -65.7% |
| 2014 | 0.52x | $123.44 Million | $237.01 Million | ▲ +56.2% |
| 2013 | 0.33x | $66.09 Million | $198.17 Million | ▲ +9.7% |
| 2012 | 0.30x | $58.67 Million | $193.02 Million | ▲ +17.0% |
| 2011 | 0.26x | $56.44 Million | $217.28 Million | ▲ +15.4% |
| 2010 | 0.23x | $35.35 Million | $157.06 Million | ▼ -28.6% |
| 2009 | 0.32x | $42.94 Million | $136.31 Million | ▼ -9.4% |
| 2008 | 0.35x | $47.80 Million | $137.50 Million | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2007 | 0.33x | $34.11 Million | $104.30 Million | ▲ +15.2% |
| 2006 | 0.28x | $26.80 Million | $94.40 Million | ▲ +10.2% |
| 2005 | 0.26x | $21.19 Million | $82.24 Million | ▼ -16.2% |
| 2004 | 0.31x | $22.16 Million | $72.09 Million | ▼ -12.2% |
| 2003 | 0.35x | $22.54 Million | $64.33 Million | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2002 | 0.39x | $19.84 Million | $51.19 Million | ▲ +40.8% |
| 2001 | 0.28x | $12.74 Million | $46.30 Million | ▲ +342.0% |
| 2000 | -0.11x | $-6.44 Million | $56.58 Million | ▼ -2424.1% |
| 1999 | 0.00x | $654.00K | $133.63 Million | ▼ -82.8% |
| 1998 | 0.03x | $2.10 Million | $73.80 Million | ▲ +109.8% |
| 1997 | -0.29x | $-6.80 Million | $23.50 Million | ▼ -222.5% |
| 1996 | 0.24x | $7.30 Million | $30.90 Million | ▼ -47.7% |
| 1995 | 0.45x | $15.90 Million | $35.20 Million | ▲ +2513.1% |
| 1994 | -0.02x | $-2.60 Million | $138.90 Million | ▼ -105.7% |
| 1993 | 0.33x | $18.30 Million | $55.90 Million | ▲ +47.3% |
| 1992 | 0.22x | $11.60 Million | $52.20 Million | ▼ -50.9% |
| 1991 | 0.45x | $21.60 Million | $47.70 Million | ▲ +2435.3% |
| 1990 | -0.02x | $-700.00K | $36.10 Million | — |