Tyler Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tyler Technologies Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Tyler Technologies Inc (TYL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $107.26 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.24 Billion) in one year. Check Tyler Technologies Inc earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Tyler Technologies Inc (1990–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Tyler Technologies Inc from 1990 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Tyler Technologies Inc across 36 annual periods. Check how aggressively does Tyler Technologies Inc reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Tyler Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1990–2025)
Tyler Technologies Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1990 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tyler Technologies Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Tyler Technologies Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.34x | $653.54 Million | $1.94 Billion | ▼ -3.2% |
| 2024 | 0.35x | $624.63 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▲ +59.3% |
| 2023 | 0.22x | $380.44 Million | $1.74 Billion | ▲ +18.3% |
| 2022 | 0.18x | $381.45 Million | $2.06 Billion | ▲ +19.8% |
| 2021 | 0.15x | $371.75 Million | $2.41 Billion | ▼ -73.0% |
| 2020 | 0.57x | $355.09 Million | $621.16 Million | ▲ +28.9% |
| 2019 | 0.44x | $254.72 Million | $574.56 Million | ▼ -17.4% |
| 2018 | 0.54x | $250.20 Million | $466.12 Million | ▲ +15.9% |
| 2017 | 0.46x | $195.75 Million | $422.50 Million | ▲ +6.8% |
| 2016 | 0.43x | $191.86 Million | $442.42 Million | ▲ +142.5% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | $89.01 Million | $497.71 Million | ▼ -65.7% |
| 2014 | 0.52x | $123.44 Million | $237.01 Million | ▲ +56.2% |
| 2013 | 0.33x | $66.09 Million | $198.17 Million | ▲ +9.7% |
| 2012 | 0.30x | $58.67 Million | $193.02 Million | ▲ +17.0% |
| 2011 | 0.26x | $56.44 Million | $217.28 Million | ▲ +15.4% |
| 2010 | 0.23x | $35.35 Million | $157.06 Million | ▼ -28.6% |
| 2009 | 0.32x | $42.94 Million | $136.31 Million | ▼ -9.4% |
| 2008 | 0.35x | $47.80 Million | $137.50 Million | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2007 | 0.33x | $34.11 Million | $104.30 Million | ▲ +15.2% |
| 2006 | 0.28x | $26.80 Million | $94.40 Million | ▲ +10.2% |
| 2005 | 0.26x | $21.19 Million | $82.24 Million | ▼ -16.2% |
| 2004 | 0.31x | $22.16 Million | $72.09 Million | ▼ -12.2% |
| 2003 | 0.35x | $22.54 Million | $64.33 Million | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2002 | 0.39x | $19.84 Million | $51.19 Million | ▲ +40.8% |
| 2001 | 0.28x | $12.74 Million | $46.30 Million | ▲ +342.0% |
| 2000 | -0.11x | $-6.44 Million | $56.58 Million | ▼ -2424.1% |
| 1999 | 0.00x | $654.00K | $133.63 Million | ▼ -82.8% |
| 1998 | 0.03x | $2.10 Million | $73.80 Million | ▲ +109.8% |
| 1997 | -0.29x | $-6.80 Million | $23.50 Million | ▼ -222.5% |
| 1996 | 0.24x | $7.30 Million | $30.90 Million | ▼ -47.7% |
| 1995 | 0.45x | $15.90 Million | $35.20 Million | ▲ +2513.1% |
| 1994 | -0.02x | $-2.60 Million | $138.90 Million | ▼ -105.7% |
| 1993 | 0.33x | $18.30 Million | $55.90 Million | ▲ +47.3% |
| 1992 | 0.22x | $11.60 Million | $52.20 Million | ▼ -50.9% |
| 1991 | 0.45x | $21.60 Million | $47.70 Million | ▲ +2435.3% |
| 1990 | -0.02x | $-700.00K | $36.10 Million | — |