Innovate Corp (VATE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Innovate Corp (VATE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $19.20 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.12 Billion) in one year. See cash generation quality of Innovate Corp to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Innovate Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Innovate Corp across 29 annual periods. Also explore Innovate Corp equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Innovate Corp (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Innovate Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see VATE company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.01x | $9.10 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▼ -60.9% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | $26.50 Million | $1.20 Billion | ▲ +375.4% |
| 2022 | -0.01x | $-9.50 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▼ -132.4% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $27.00 Million | $1.09 Billion | ▲ +269.0% |
| 2020 | 0.01x | $41.10 Million | $6.11 Billion | ▼ -60.5% |
| 2019 | 0.02x | $110.70 Million | $6.49 Billion | ▼ -68.5% |
| 2018 | 0.05x | $341.40 Million | $6.30 Billion | ▲ +2570.7% |
| 2017 | 0.00x | $6.14 Million | $3.03 Billion | ▼ -92.9% |
| 2016 | 0.03x | $79.15 Million | $2.77 Billion | ▲ +330.5% |
| 2015 | -0.01x | $-32.56 Million | $2.62 Billion | ▼ -123.1% |
| 2014 | 0.05x | $32.81 Million | $611.22 Million | ▲ +108.8% |
| 2013 | -0.61x | $-20.32 Million | $33.27 Million | ▼ -702.8% |
| 2012 | 0.10x | $23.57 Million | $232.69 Million | ▲ +4.3% |
| 2011 | 0.10x | $42.93 Million | $442.12 Million | ▲ +14.8% |
| 2010 | 0.08x | $36.48 Million | $431.43 Million | ▲ +33.9% |
| 2009 | 0.06x | $28.98 Million | $459.00 Million | ▲ +469.6% |
| 2008 | 0.01x | $8.78 Million | $791.98 Million | ▼ -12.2% |
| 2007 | 0.01x | $11.47 Million | $907.94 Million | ▼ -15.6% |
| 2006 | 0.01x | $12.87 Million | $860.50 Million | ▲ +125.9% |
| 2005 | -0.06x | $-50.72 Million | $877.42 Million | ▼ -172.4% |
| 2004 | 0.08x | $69.21 Million | $867.36 Million | ▲ +1.0% |
| 2003 | 0.08x | $66.95 Million | $847.53 Million | ▲ +103.5% |
| 2002 | 0.04x | $34.63 Million | $892.41 Million | ▲ +135.1% |
| 2001 | -0.11x | $-110.06 Million | $994.70 Million | ▼ -40.6% |
| 2000 | -0.08x | $-131.02 Million | $1.66 Billion | ▼ -78.5% |
| 1999 | -0.04x | $-55.57 Million | $1.26 Billion | ▲ +65.4% |
| 1998 | -0.13x | $-71.30 Million | $559.05 Million | ▼ -172.6% |
| 1997 | -0.05x | $-14.76 Million | $315.49 Million | ▲ +56.8% |
| 1996 | -0.11x | $-6.94 Million | $64.12 Million | — |