Innovate Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Innovate Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Innovate Corp (VATE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $45.50 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.17 Billion) in one year. Check VATE cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Innovate Corp (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Innovate Corp from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Innovate Corp across 30 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of Innovate Corp to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Innovate Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
Innovate Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Innovate Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Innovate Corp cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.13x | $146.60 Million | $1.17 Billion | ▲ +1352.7% |
| 2024 | 0.01x | $9.10 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▼ -60.9% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | $26.50 Million | $1.20 Billion | ▲ +375.4% |
| 2022 | -0.01x | $-9.50 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▼ -132.4% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $27.00 Million | $1.09 Billion | ▲ +269.0% |
| 2020 | 0.01x | $41.10 Million | $6.11 Billion | ▼ -60.5% |
| 2019 | 0.02x | $110.70 Million | $6.49 Billion | ▼ -68.5% |
| 2018 | 0.05x | $341.40 Million | $6.30 Billion | ▲ +2570.7% |
| 2017 | 0.00x | $6.14 Million | $3.03 Billion | ▼ -92.9% |
| 2016 | 0.03x | $79.15 Million | $2.77 Billion | ▲ +330.5% |
| 2015 | -0.01x | $-32.56 Million | $2.62 Billion | ▼ -123.1% |
| 2014 | 0.05x | $32.81 Million | $611.22 Million | ▲ +108.8% |
| 2013 | -0.61x | $-20.32 Million | $33.27 Million | ▼ -702.8% |
| 2012 | 0.10x | $23.57 Million | $232.69 Million | ▲ +4.3% |
| 2011 | 0.10x | $42.93 Million | $442.12 Million | ▲ +14.8% |
| 2010 | 0.08x | $36.48 Million | $431.43 Million | ▲ +33.9% |
| 2009 | 0.06x | $28.98 Million | $459.00 Million | ▲ +469.6% |
| 2008 | 0.01x | $8.78 Million | $791.98 Million | ▼ -12.2% |
| 2007 | 0.01x | $11.47 Million | $907.94 Million | ▼ -15.6% |
| 2006 | 0.01x | $12.87 Million | $860.50 Million | ▲ +125.9% |
| 2005 | -0.06x | $-50.72 Million | $877.42 Million | ▼ -172.4% |
| 2004 | 0.08x | $69.21 Million | $867.36 Million | ▲ +1.0% |
| 2003 | 0.08x | $66.95 Million | $847.53 Million | ▲ +103.5% |
| 2002 | 0.04x | $34.63 Million | $892.41 Million | ▲ +135.1% |
| 2001 | -0.11x | $-110.06 Million | $994.70 Million | ▼ -40.6% |
| 2000 | -0.08x | $-131.02 Million | $1.66 Billion | ▼ -78.5% |
| 1999 | -0.04x | $-55.57 Million | $1.26 Billion | ▲ +65.4% |
| 1998 | -0.13x | $-71.30 Million | $559.05 Million | ▼ -172.6% |
| 1997 | -0.05x | $-14.76 Million | $315.49 Million | ▲ +56.8% |
| 1996 | -0.11x | $-6.94 Million | $64.12 Million | — |