Wabash National Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Wabash National Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Wabash National Corporation (WNC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-33.65 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($907.39 Million) in one year. Check Wabash National Corporation cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Wabash National Corporation (1990–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Wabash National Corporation from 1990 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Wabash National Corporation across 36 annual periods. Check how aggressively does Wabash National Corporation reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Wabash National Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1990–2025)
Wabash National Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1990 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Wabash National Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see WNC cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.01x | $11.67 Million | $802.70 Million | ▼ -84.9% |
| 2024 | 0.10x | $117.27 Million | $1.22 Billion | ▼ -75.6% |
| 2023 | 0.39x | $319.61 Million | $812.72 Million | ▲ +155.3% |
| 2022 | 0.15x | $124.08 Million | $805.40 Million | ▲ +1754.5% |
| 2021 | -0.01x | $-7.47 Million | $802.21 Million | ▼ -105.8% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | $124.13 Million | $775.05 Million | ▼ -14.2% |
| 2019 | 0.19x | $146.28 Million | $783.60 Million | ▲ +37.9% |
| 2018 | 0.14x | $112.47 Million | $830.54 Million | ▼ -20.7% |
| 2017 | 0.17x | $144.38 Million | $845.45 Million | ▼ -59.3% |
| 2016 | 0.42x | $178.75 Million | $426.34 Million | ▲ +62.3% |
| 2015 | 0.26x | $131.79 Million | $510.31 Million | ▲ +49.9% |
| 2014 | 0.17x | $92.64 Million | $537.82 Million | ▼ -19.5% |
| 2013 | 0.21x | $128.67 Million | $601.19 Million | ▲ +78.5% |
| 2012 | 0.12x | $76.02 Million | $633.90 Million | ▲ +2583.7% |
| 2011 | 0.00x | $-1.17 Million | $241.70 Million | ▲ +97.2% |
| 2010 | -0.17x | $-30.31 Million | $173.81 Million | ▼ -323.3% |
| 2009 | -0.04x | $-7.01 Million | $170.29 Million | ▼ -124.0% |
| 2008 | 0.17x | $30.67 Million | $178.54 Million | ▼ -41.0% |
| 2007 | 0.29x | $59.33 Million | $203.65 Million | ▲ +56.7% |
| 2006 | 0.19x | $51.77 Million | $278.53 Million | ▼ -0.6% |
| 2005 | 0.19x | $50.50 Million | $269.95 Million | ▼ -12.1% |
| 2004 | 0.21x | $56.92 Million | $267.47 Million | ▲ +36.9% |
| 2003 | 0.16x | $58.26 Million | $374.87 Million | ▼ -30.5% |
| 2002 | 0.22x | $109.88 Million | $491.58 Million | ▲ +1864.3% |
| 2001 | 0.01x | $6.39 Million | $561.52 Million | ▲ +134.5% |
| 2000 | -0.03x | $-13.67 Million | $414.38 Million | ▼ -121.4% |
| 1999 | 0.15x | $63.50 Million | $411.90 Million | ▼ -55.1% |
| 1998 | 0.34x | $123.10 Million | $358.70 Million | ▲ +367.3% |
| 1997 | -0.13x | $-51.80 Million | $403.40 Million | ▼ -460.1% |
| 1996 | -0.02x | $-6.00 Million | $261.70 Million | ▲ +80.0% |
| 1995 | -0.11x | $-23.70 Million | $206.50 Million | ▼ -211.3% |
| 1994 | 0.10x | $15.10 Million | $146.50 Million | ▼ -71.0% |
| 1993 | 0.36x | $32.80 Million | $92.30 Million | ▲ +452.9% |
| 1992 | -0.10x | $-7.30 Million | $72.50 Million | ▼ -157.5% |
| 1991 | 0.18x | $7.00 Million | $40.00 Million | ▼ -25.2% |
| 1990 | 0.23x | $8.10 Million | $34.60 Million | — |