Elis SA (ELIS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Latest as of December 2025:
0.15x
Elis SA (ELIS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.15x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of €861.10 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (€5.76 Billion) in one year. Explore ELIS long-term asset investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
0.15x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities
Operating Cash Flow
€861.10 Million
EUR
Total Liabilities
€5.76 Billion
EUR
Data as of
Dec 2025
Most recent filing
Elis SA Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2011–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Elis SA across 15 annual periods. Also explore ELIS total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Elis SA (2011–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Elis SA. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Elis SA.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (EUR) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.24x | €1.41 Billion | €5.76 Billion | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2024 | 0.25x | €1.45 Billion | €5.79 Billion | ▲ +10.2% |
| 2023 | 0.23x | €1.33 Billion | €5.83 Billion | ▲ +12.7% |
| 2022 | 0.20x | €1.09 Billion | €5.40 Billion | ▲ +14.4% |
| 2021 | 0.18x | €887.00 Million | €5.03 Billion | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | €783.50 Million | €5.05 Billion | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2019 | 0.19x | €1.02 Billion | €5.24 Billion | ▲ +12.2% |
| 2018 | 0.17x | €853.30 Million | €4.93 Billion | ▲ +107.1% |
| 2017 | 0.08x | €421.60 Million | €5.04 Billion | ▼ -49.8% |
| 2016 | 0.17x | €424.80 Million | €2.55 Billion | ▲ +24.4% |
| 2015 | 0.13x | €293.89 Million | €2.20 Billion | ▲ +2.4% |
| 2014 | 0.13x | €360.96 Million | €2.76 Billion | ▼ -5.0% |
| 2013 | 0.14x | €367.77 Million | €2.67 Billion | ▲ +23.0% |
| 2012 | 0.11x | €342.80 Million | €3.06 Billion | ▼ -5.5% |
| 2011 | 0.12x | €351.39 Million | €2.97 Billion | — |
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.