Tibet GaoZheng Explosive Co Ltd (002827) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 0.03x

Tibet GaoZheng Explosive Co Ltd (002827) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CN¥55.04 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CN¥1.71 Billion) in one year. See Tibet GaoZheng Explosive Co Ltd free cash flow to debt ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.03x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

CN¥55.04 Million
CNY

Total Liabilities

CN¥1.71 Billion
CNY

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Tibet GaoZheng Explosive Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2012–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Tibet GaoZheng Explosive Co Ltd across 13 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Tibet GaoZheng Explosive Co Ltd.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tibet GaoZheng Explosive Co Ltd (2012–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tibet GaoZheng Explosive Co Ltd. Check 002827 cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (CNY) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.00x CN¥276.64K CN¥1.38 Billion ▼ -99.4%
2023 0.03x CN¥53.20 Million CN¥1.57 Billion ▲ +181.1%
2022 -0.04x CN¥-46.91 Million CN¥1.12 Billion ▼ -331.3%
2021 -0.01x CN¥-6.61 Million CN¥681.30 Million ▼ -104.9%
2020 0.20x CN¥113.78 Million CN¥569.91 Million ▲ +424.3%
2019 0.04x CN¥12.99 Million CN¥341.24 Million ▼ -92.7%
2018 0.52x CN¥84.24 Million CN¥161.69 Million ▼ -68.0%
2017 1.63x CN¥112.33 Million CN¥69.02 Million ▲ +72.4%
2016 0.94x CN¥154.87 Million CN¥164.03 Million ▼ -12.2%
2015 1.08x CN¥113.46 Million CN¥105.51 Million ▲ +264.6%
2014 0.29x CN¥37.86 Million CN¥128.33 Million ▼ -25.1%
2013 0.39x CN¥64.44 Million CN¥163.65 Million ▼ -17.2%
2012 0.48x CN¥49.74 Million CN¥104.57 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.