Guangdong LingXiao Pump Industry Co Ltd (002884) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 1.04x

Guangdong LingXiao Pump Industry Co Ltd (002884) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 1.04x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CN¥176.83 Million could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities (CN¥170.06 Million) in one year. Explore 002884 long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

1.04x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

CN¥176.83 Million
CNY

Total Liabilities

CN¥170.06 Million
CNY

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Guangdong LingXiao Pump Industry Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2012–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Guangdong LingXiao Pump Industry Co Ltd across 13 annual periods. Also explore 002884 total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Guangdong LingXiao Pump Industry Co Ltd (2012–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Guangdong LingXiao Pump Industry Co Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see 002884 company net worth.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (CNY) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 2.49x CN¥443.40 Million CN¥177.83 Million ▼ -11.8%
2023 2.83x CN¥417.48 Million CN¥147.69 Million ▼ -38.5%
2022 4.59x CN¥629.37 Million CN¥137.04 Million ▲ +277.7%
2021 1.22x CN¥274.07 Million CN¥225.41 Million ▼ -14.6%
2020 1.42x CN¥277.23 Million CN¥194.80 Million ▼ -44.6%
2019 2.57x CN¥329.76 Million CN¥128.37 Million ▲ +39.1%
2018 1.85x CN¥196.17 Million CN¥106.24 Million ▲ +54.1%
2017 1.20x CN¥123.54 Million CN¥103.12 Million ▼ -16.2%
2016 1.43x CN¥150.06 Million CN¥104.95 Million ▼ -29.8%
2015 2.04x CN¥169.50 Million CN¥83.28 Million ▲ +71.1%
2014 1.19x CN¥96.42 Million CN¥81.03 Million ▲ +44.5%
2013 0.82x CN¥68.59 Million CN¥83.27 Million ▲ +84.3%
2012 0.45x CN¥60.06 Million CN¥134.38 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.