Shenzhen SEG Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Shenzhen SEG Co Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Shenzhen SEG Co Ltd (200058) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.11x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of HK$266.09 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (HK$2.53 Billion) in one year. Check Shenzhen SEG Co Ltd earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Shenzhen SEG Co Ltd (1998–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Shenzhen SEG Co Ltd from 1998 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Shenzhen SEG Co Ltd across 28 annual periods. Check Shenzhen SEG Co Ltd (200058) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Shenzhen SEG Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2025)
Shenzhen SEG Co Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Shenzhen SEG Co Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Shenzhen SEG Co Ltd operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (HKD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.13x | HK$316.68 Million | HK$2.53 Billion | ▲ +35.5% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | HK$239.47 Million | HK$2.59 Billion | ▼ -26.7% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | HK$362.45 Million | HK$2.88 Billion | ▲ +62.4% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | HK$222.48 Million | HK$2.87 Billion | ▼ -68.5% |
| 2021 | 0.25x | HK$754.03 Million | HK$3.06 Billion | ▲ +239.0% |
| 2020 | 0.07x | HK$243.54 Million | HK$3.35 Billion | ▼ -37.8% |
| 2019 | 0.12x | HK$430.50 Million | HK$3.68 Billion | ▲ +226.4% |
| 2018 | 0.04x | HK$167.67 Million | HK$4.68 Billion | ▼ -68.8% |
| 2017 | 0.12x | HK$507.39 Million | HK$4.41 Billion | ▲ +175.7% |
| 2016 | -0.15x | HK$-120.03 Million | HK$789.77 Million | ▼ -1040.2% |
| 2015 | -0.01x | HK$-12.45 Million | HK$934.32 Million | ▲ +96.4% |
| 2014 | -0.37x | HK$-427.93 Million | HK$1.16 Billion | ▼ -109.7% |
| 2013 | -0.18x | HK$-122.53 Million | HK$699.13 Million | ▼ -40.4% |
| 2012 | -0.12x | HK$-45.99 Million | HK$368.32 Million | ▼ -163.1% |
| 2011 | 0.20x | HK$69.55 Million | HK$351.22 Million | ▼ -47.1% |
| 2010 | 0.37x | HK$109.49 Million | HK$292.69 Million | ▲ +26.0% |
| 2009 | 0.30x | HK$75.10 Million | HK$253.01 Million | ▼ -3.6% |
| 2008 | 0.31x | HK$77.79 Million | HK$252.54 Million | ▲ +231.6% |
| 2007 | -0.23x | HK$-79.51 Million | HK$339.80 Million | ▼ -255.6% |
| 2006 | 0.15x | HK$245.70 Million | HK$1.63 Billion | ▲ +42.2% |
| 2005 | 0.11x | HK$190.40 Million | HK$1.80 Billion | ▲ +177.6% |
| 2004 | 0.04x | HK$74.67 Million | HK$1.96 Billion | ▼ -76.3% |
| 2003 | 0.16x | HK$324.16 Million | HK$2.02 Billion | ▼ -50.3% |
| 2002 | 0.32x | HK$651.83 Million | HK$2.02 Billion | ▲ +117.8% |
| 2001 | 0.15x | HK$288.44 Million | HK$1.94 Billion | ▲ +654.7% |
| 2000 | -0.03x | HK$-50.27 Million | HK$1.88 Billion | ▼ -198.7% |
| 1999 | 0.03x | HK$53.40 Million | HK$1.97 Billion | ▼ -88.2% |
| 1998 | 0.23x | HK$225.98 Million | HK$981.24 Million | — |