Fibocom Wireless Inc (300638) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 0.09x

Fibocom Wireless Inc (300638) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CN¥321.13 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CN¥3.76 Billion) in one year. See Fibocom Wireless Inc financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.09x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

CN¥321.13 Million
CNY

Total Liabilities

CN¥3.76 Billion
CNY

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Fibocom Wireless Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2012–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Fibocom Wireless Inc across 14 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Fibocom Wireless Inc generate cash.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Fibocom Wireless Inc (2012–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Fibocom Wireless Inc. Check cash flow quality index of Fibocom Wireless Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (CNY) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.10x CN¥353.31 Million CN¥3.42 Billion ▼ -7.6%
2024 0.11x CN¥439.89 Million CN¥3.94 Billion ▼ -32.2%
2023 0.16x CN¥653.98 Million CN¥3.97 Billion ▲ +118.5%
2022 0.08x CN¥299.55 Million CN¥3.97 Billion ▲ +140.3%
2021 -0.19x CN¥-422.00 Million CN¥2.26 Billion ▼ -177.8%
2020 0.24x CN¥337.09 Million CN¥1.40 Billion ▼ -19.1%
2019 0.30x CN¥223.15 Million CN¥750.83 Million ▲ +1945.4%
2018 -0.02x CN¥-8.93 Million CN¥554.58 Million ▲ +96.8%
2017 -0.50x CN¥-122.83 Million CN¥245.88 Million ▼ -235.7%
2016 0.37x CN¥48.82 Million CN¥132.63 Million ▼ -32.7%
2015 0.55x CN¥46.17 Million CN¥84.35 Million ▼ -27.5%
2014 0.75x CN¥48.46 Million CN¥64.24 Million ▲ +167.0%
2013 0.28x CN¥15.96 Million CN¥56.49 Million ▲ +214.1%
2012 0.09x CN¥5.44 Million CN¥60.52 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.