Jiangsu Gian Technology Co Ltd (300709) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 0.26x

Jiangsu Gian Technology Co Ltd (300709) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.26x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CN¥467.33 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CN¥1.83 Billion) in one year. See how financially flexible is Jiangsu Gian Technology Co Ltd to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.26x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

CN¥467.33 Million
CNY

Total Liabilities

CN¥1.83 Billion
CNY

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Jiangsu Gian Technology Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2013–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Jiangsu Gian Technology Co Ltd across 13 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Jiangsu Gian Technology Co Ltd cash flow conversion.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Jiangsu Gian Technology Co Ltd (2013–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Jiangsu Gian Technology Co Ltd. Check 300709 operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (CNY) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.25x CN¥447.98 Million CN¥1.78 Billion ▼ -20.1%
2024 0.32x CN¥359.95 Million CN¥1.14 Billion ▼ -3.4%
2023 0.33x CN¥382.24 Million CN¥1.17 Billion ▲ +67.2%
2022 0.20x CN¥317.79 Million CN¥1.63 Billion ▲ +28.4%
2021 0.15x CN¥187.71 Million CN¥1.23 Billion ▲ +1224.6%
2020 -0.01x CN¥-21.11 Million CN¥1.56 Billion ▼ -102.6%
2019 0.52x CN¥392.15 Million CN¥761.31 Million ▲ +142.4%
2018 0.21x CN¥82.40 Million CN¥387.73 Million ▼ -49.0%
2017 0.42x CN¥130.13 Million CN¥312.42 Million ▲ +1.9%
2016 0.41x CN¥172.73 Million CN¥422.43 Million ▲ +4.4%
2015 0.39x CN¥90.53 Million CN¥231.21 Million ▲ +110.7%
2014 0.19x CN¥21.52 Million CN¥115.78 Million ▼ -1.8%
2013 0.19x CN¥14.02 Million CN¥74.08 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.