Jushri Technologies Inc Class A (300762) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: -0.02x

Jushri Technologies Inc Class A (300762) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CN¥-23.27 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CN¥1.48 Billion) in one year. See Jushri Technologies Inc Class A free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.02x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

CN¥-23.27 Million
CNY

Total Liabilities

CN¥1.48 Billion
CNY

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Jushri Technologies Inc Class A Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2014–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Jushri Technologies Inc Class A across 12 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Jushri Technologies Inc Class A to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Jushri Technologies Inc Class A (2014–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Jushri Technologies Inc Class A. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Jushri Technologies Inc Class A.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (CNY) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.03x CN¥43.72 Million CN¥1.56 Billion ▲ +132.5%
2024 -0.09x CN¥-107.46 Million CN¥1.25 Billion ▲ +72.2%
2023 -0.31x CN¥-303.96 Million CN¥984.16 Million ▼ -2057.9%
2022 -0.01x CN¥-9.68 Million CN¥676.28 Million ▼ -104.1%
2021 0.35x CN¥222.42 Million CN¥640.38 Million ▲ +136.2%
2020 0.15x CN¥75.79 Million CN¥515.45 Million ▲ +1212.7%
2019 -0.01x CN¥-5.90 Million CN¥446.31 Million ▲ +86.3%
2018 -0.10x CN¥-40.13 Million CN¥415.24 Million ▲ +44.2%
2017 -0.17x CN¥-47.04 Million CN¥271.52 Million ▲ +63.5%
2016 -0.47x CN¥-87.34 Million CN¥184.10 Million ▼ -42.2%
2015 -0.33x CN¥-26.33 Million CN¥78.89 Million ▲ +36.7%
2014 -0.53x CN¥-60.67 Million CN¥115.18 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.