Guangdong Huiyun Titanium Industry (300891) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 0.00x

Guangdong Huiyun Titanium Industry (300891) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CN¥-3.37 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CN¥1.77 Billion) in one year. Check Guangdong Huiyun Titanium Industry investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.00x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

CN¥-3.37 Million
CNY

Total Liabilities

CN¥1.77 Billion
CNY

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Guangdong Huiyun Titanium Industry Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2014–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Guangdong Huiyun Titanium Industry across 12 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of Guangdong Huiyun Titanium Industry for the complete picture of this company's asset base.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Guangdong Huiyun Titanium Industry (2014–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Guangdong Huiyun Titanium Industry. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Guangdong Huiyun Titanium Industry worth.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (CNY) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.07x CN¥133.22 Million CN¥1.80 Billion ▲ +436.0%
2024 0.01x CN¥19.83 Million CN¥1.44 Billion ▼ -89.6%
2023 0.13x CN¥164.28 Million CN¥1.24 Billion ▲ +7464.6%
2022 0.00x CN¥1.94 Million CN¥1.10 Billion ▼ -99.5%
2021 0.34x CN¥174.03 Million CN¥515.10 Million ▲ +31.2%
2020 0.26x CN¥64.56 Million CN¥250.70 Million ▼ -51.1%
2019 0.53x CN¥138.66 Million CN¥263.16 Million ▲ +181.9%
2018 0.19x CN¥66.38 Million CN¥355.17 Million ▼ -48.4%
2017 0.36x CN¥130.53 Million CN¥360.32 Million ▲ +75.0%
2016 0.21x CN¥85.29 Million CN¥412.12 Million ▲ +30.4%
2015 0.16x CN¥72.67 Million CN¥457.99 Million ▼ -22.3%
2014 0.20x CN¥106.80 Million CN¥522.96 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.