Zhejiang Shengda Pharm (603079) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 0.08x

Zhejiang Shengda Pharm (603079) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CN¥45.27 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CN¥542.15 Million) in one year. Check Zhejiang Shengda Pharm total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.08x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

CN¥45.27 Million
CNY

Total Liabilities

CN¥542.15 Million
CNY

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Zhejiang Shengda Pharm Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2012–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Zhejiang Shengda Pharm across 14 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of Zhejiang Shengda Pharm for the complete picture of this company's asset base.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Zhejiang Shengda Pharm (2012–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Zhejiang Shengda Pharm. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see 603079 market cap overview.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (CNY) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.24x CN¥138.88 Million CN¥583.75 Million ▼ -19.3%
2024 0.29x CN¥147.88 Million CN¥501.34 Million ▲ +105.7%
2023 0.14x CN¥64.42 Million CN¥449.20 Million ▲ +9.8%
2022 0.13x CN¥40.72 Million CN¥311.76 Million ▼ -25.0%
2021 0.17x CN¥74.46 Million CN¥427.84 Million ▼ -80.4%
2020 0.89x CN¥333.20 Million CN¥375.80 Million ▲ +840.2%
2019 0.09x CN¥58.55 Million CN¥620.88 Million ▼ -54.9%
2018 0.21x CN¥88.69 Million CN¥424.29 Million ▼ -52.4%
2017 0.44x CN¥95.33 Million CN¥217.27 Million ▲ +81.1%
2016 0.24x CN¥73.00 Million CN¥301.35 Million ▼ -69.7%
2015 0.80x CN¥148.07 Million CN¥185.05 Million ▲ +419.6%
2014 0.15x CN¥34.40 Million CN¥223.40 Million ▼ -67.2%
2013 0.47x CN¥105.28 Million CN¥224.00 Million ▲ +37.2%
2012 0.34x CN¥110.08 Million CN¥321.43 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.