Zhejiang Tiancheng Control Co (603085) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 0.04x

Zhejiang Tiancheng Control Co (603085) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CN¥99.69 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CN¥2.62 Billion) in one year. See Zhejiang Tiancheng Control Co (603085) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.04x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

CN¥99.69 Million
CNY

Total Liabilities

CN¥2.62 Billion
CNY

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Zhejiang Tiancheng Control Co Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2012–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Zhejiang Tiancheng Control Co across 13 annual periods. Also explore Zhejiang Tiancheng Control Co annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Zhejiang Tiancheng Control Co (2012–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Zhejiang Tiancheng Control Co. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Zhejiang Tiancheng Control Co.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (CNY) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.01x CN¥32.43 Million CN¥2.53 Billion ▼ -55.9%
2023 0.03x CN¥50.06 Million CN¥1.72 Billion ▼ -52.2%
2022 0.06x CN¥89.49 Million CN¥1.47 Billion ▲ +7.5%
2021 0.06x CN¥87.42 Million CN¥1.54 Billion ▲ +56.9%
2020 0.04x CN¥50.25 Million CN¥1.39 Billion ▲ +257.9%
2019 0.01x CN¥16.08 Million CN¥1.60 Billion ▲ +121.4%
2018 -0.05x CN¥-62.55 Million CN¥1.33 Billion ▲ +78.3%
2017 -0.22x CN¥-117.93 Million CN¥544.48 Million ▼ -192.2%
2016 0.23x CN¥39.31 Million CN¥167.35 Million ▲ +29.7%
2015 0.18x CN¥22.40 Million CN¥123.68 Million ▼ -6.5%
2014 0.19x CN¥35.64 Million CN¥183.88 Million ▲ +25.1%
2013 0.15x CN¥25.96 Million CN¥167.56 Million ▼ -37.4%
2012 0.25x CN¥30.18 Million CN¥122.00 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.