Cashway Technology Co Ltd (603106) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: -0.05x

Cashway Technology Co Ltd (603106) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CN¥-19.03 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CN¥352.86 Million) in one year. Check Cashway Technology Co Ltd (603106) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.05x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

CN¥-19.03 Million
CNY

Total Liabilities

CN¥352.86 Million
CNY

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Cashway Technology Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2013–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Cashway Technology Co Ltd across 13 annual periods. Also explore Cashway Technology Co Ltd total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Cashway Technology Co Ltd (2013–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Cashway Technology Co Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Cashway Technology Co Ltd (603106) market capitalisation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (CNY) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 -0.05x CN¥-18.60 Million CN¥345.76 Million ▼ -137.0%
2024 0.15x CN¥63.56 Million CN¥437.01 Million ▲ +413.8%
2023 0.03x CN¥15.76 Million CN¥556.86 Million ▲ +150.2%
2022 -0.06x CN¥-41.92 Million CN¥743.05 Million ▼ -418.6%
2021 0.02x CN¥14.57 Million CN¥822.84 Million ▲ +143.7%
2020 -0.04x CN¥-38.02 Million CN¥937.24 Million ▼ -178.9%
2019 0.05x CN¥54.94 Million CN¥1.07 Billion ▼ -83.2%
2018 0.31x CN¥202.61 Million CN¥662.22 Million ▲ +6.9%
2017 0.29x CN¥214.66 Million CN¥749.72 Million ▲ +236.3%
2016 0.09x CN¥95.38 Million CN¥1.12 Billion ▲ +9181.3%
2015 0.00x CN¥664.85K CN¥724.78 Million ▼ -99.7%
2014 0.27x CN¥160.06 Million CN¥594.61 Million ▲ +258.4%
2013 -0.17x CN¥-121.17 Million CN¥713.10 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.