Guangxi Liuzhou Pharm Co Ltd (603368) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 0.00x

Guangxi Liuzhou Pharm Co Ltd (603368) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CN¥45.64 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CN¥13.05 Billion) in one year. See 603368 free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.00x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

CN¥45.64 Million
CNY

Total Liabilities

CN¥13.05 Billion
CNY

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Guangxi Liuzhou Pharm Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2011–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Guangxi Liuzhou Pharm Co Ltd across 14 annual periods. Also explore 603368 net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Guangxi Liuzhou Pharm Co Ltd (2011–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Guangxi Liuzhou Pharm Co Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Guangxi Liuzhou Pharm Co Ltd stock valuation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (CNY) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.06x CN¥838.51 Million CN¥13.33 Billion ▲ +38.6%
2023 0.05x CN¥594.41 Million CN¥13.10 Billion ▲ +9.7%
2022 0.04x CN¥506.43 Million CN¥12.24 Billion ▲ +25.1%
2021 0.03x CN¥332.88 Million CN¥10.07 Billion ▼ -53.4%
2020 0.07x CN¥664.69 Million CN¥9.36 Billion ▲ +25.5%
2019 0.06x CN¥412.91 Million CN¥7.30 Billion ▲ +1352.1%
2018 0.00x CN¥22.30 Million CN¥5.73 Billion ▲ +104.7%
2017 -0.08x CN¥-332.59 Million CN¥3.99 Billion ▼ -334.2%
2016 0.04x CN¥108.39 Million CN¥3.04 Billion ▲ +197.8%
2015 -0.04x CN¥-107.25 Million CN¥2.94 Billion ▲ +29.5%
2014 -0.05x CN¥-132.42 Million CN¥2.56 Billion ▼ -608.6%
2013 0.01x CN¥22.33 Million CN¥2.20 Billion ▼ -72.3%
2012 0.04x CN¥60.51 Million CN¥1.65 Billion ▼ -64.3%
2011 0.10x CN¥133.38 Million CN¥1.30 Billion
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.