EmbedWay Tech(Shanghai)Corp (603496) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 0.10x

EmbedWay Tech(Shanghai)Corp (603496) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CN¥52.98 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CN¥554.44 Million) in one year. See EmbedWay Tech(Shanghai)Corp (603496) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.10x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

CN¥52.98 Million
CNY

Total Liabilities

CN¥554.44 Million
CNY

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

EmbedWay Tech(Shanghai)Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2012–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for EmbedWay Tech(Shanghai)Corp across 13 annual periods. Also explore 603496 year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for EmbedWay Tech(Shanghai)Corp (2012–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for EmbedWay Tech(Shanghai)Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see EmbedWay Tech(Shanghai)Corp (603496) total market value.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (CNY) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.00x CN¥2.48 Million CN¥646.40 Million ▼ -94.1%
2023 0.06x CN¥69.94 Million CN¥1.09 Billion ▲ +15.3%
2022 0.06x CN¥24.72 Million CN¥442.60 Million ▲ +137.3%
2021 -0.15x CN¥-65.96 Million CN¥440.86 Million ▲ +32.8%
2020 -0.22x CN¥-79.43 Million CN¥356.82 Million ▼ -334.5%
2019 0.09x CN¥15.61 Million CN¥164.47 Million ▼ -61.0%
2018 0.24x CN¥39.06 Million CN¥160.57 Million ▲ +146.6%
2017 -0.52x CN¥-58.71 Million CN¥112.53 Million ▼ -193.3%
2016 0.56x CN¥57.05 Million CN¥102.03 Million ▲ +295.5%
2015 0.14x CN¥12.79 Million CN¥90.50 Million ▼ -40.5%
2014 0.24x CN¥23.66 Million CN¥99.61 Million ▼ -77.0%
2013 1.03x CN¥55.97 Million CN¥54.22 Million ▲ +102.6%
2012 0.51x CN¥24.13 Million CN¥47.36 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.