Enorama Pharma AB Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of June 2026: -0.26x

Enorama Pharma AB cash flow-to-debt ratio. Enorama Pharma AB (ERMA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.26x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of Skr-14.97 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (Skr57.39 Million) in one year. Check Enorama Pharma AB (ERMA) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.26x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

Skr-14.97 Million
SEK

Total Liabilities

Skr57.39 Million
SEK

Data as of

Jun 2026
Most recent filing

Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Enorama Pharma AB (2014–2025)

Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Enorama Pharma AB from 2014 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Enorama Pharma AB across 12 annual periods. Check Enorama Pharma AB total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

Enorama Pharma AB Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2014–2025)

Enorama Pharma AB cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2014 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Enorama Pharma AB. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Enorama Pharma AB.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (SEK) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 -1.87x Skr-59.26 Million Skr31.71 Million ▲ +57.7%
2024 -4.41x Skr-35.70 Million Skr8.09 Million ▼ -58.4%
2023 -2.79x Skr-41.35 Million Skr14.85 Million ▼ -45.3%
2022 -1.92x Skr-32.96 Million Skr17.20 Million ▼ -87.9%
2021 -1.02x Skr-30.16 Million Skr29.58 Million ▼ -73.5%
2020 -0.59x Skr-23.00 Million Skr39.13 Million ▲ +21.7%
2019 -0.75x Skr-26.56 Million Skr35.40 Million ▼ -22.5%
2018 -0.61x Skr-13.36 Million Skr21.81 Million ▲ +25.3%
2017 -0.82x Skr-6.67 Million Skr8.13 Million ▲ +39.0%
2016 -1.34x Skr-6.11 Million Skr4.55 Million ▼ -840.8%
2015 0.18x Skr480.00K Skr2.64 Million ▼ -38.9%
2014 0.30x Skr307.00K Skr1.03 Million —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.