Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCA (publ) Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCA (publ) cash flow-to-debt ratio. Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCA (publ) (SCA-A) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of Skr692.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (Skr46.47 Billion) in one year. Check Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCA (publ total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCA (publ) (2002–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCA (publ) from 2002 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCA (publ) across 24 annual periods. Check Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCA (publ (SCA-A) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCA (publ) Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2002–2025)
Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCA (publ) cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2002 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCA (publ). For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see SCA-A cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (SEK) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | Skr4.02 Billion | Skr44.94 Billion | ▲ +16.0% |
| 2024 | 0.08x | Skr3.49 Billion | Skr45.23 Billion | ▼ -13.6% |
| 2023 | 0.09x | Skr3.89 Billion | Skr43.67 Billion | ▼ -42.2% |
| 2022 | 0.15x | Skr6.33 Billion | Skr41.00 Billion | ▼ -9.2% |
| 2021 | 0.17x | Skr5.97 Billion | Skr35.18 Billion | ▲ +49.0% |
| 2020 | 0.11x | Skr3.70 Billion | Skr32.50 Billion | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2019 | 0.11x | Skr3.30 Billion | Skr30.55 Billion | ▼ -33.9% |
| 2018 | 0.16x | Skr3.50 Billion | Skr21.49 Billion | ▼ -55.2% |
| 2017 | 0.36x | Skr7.27 Billion | Skr19.96 Billion | ▲ +102.0% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | Skr15.56 Billion | Skr86.23 Billion | ▼ -1.1% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | Skr13.99 Billion | Skr76.68 Billion | ▲ +25.7% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | Skr11.88 Billion | Skr81.86 Billion | ▲ +17.0% |
| 2013 | 0.12x | Skr9.43 Billion | Skr75.97 Billion | ▼ -20.9% |
| 2012 | 0.16x | Skr11.20 Billion | Skr71.37 Billion | ▲ +20.2% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | Skr10.14 Billion | Skr77.71 Billion | ▼ -10.9% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | Skr11.02 Billion | Skr75.16 Billion | ▼ -21.4% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | Skr15.28 Billion | Skr81.95 Billion | ▲ +83.3% |
| 2008 | 0.10x | Skr9.33 Billion | Skr91.72 Billion | ▼ -15.6% |
| 2007 | 0.12x | Skr9.73 Billion | Skr80.77 Billion | ▲ +7.2% |
| 2006 | 0.11x | Skr8.46 Billion | Skr75.25 Billion | ▼ -3.6% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | Skr9.11 Billion | Skr78.11 Billion | ▼ -18.7% |
| 2004 | 0.14x | Skr9.49 Billion | Skr66.24 Billion | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2003 | 0.20x | Skr11.65 Billion | Skr56.85 Billion | ▲ +8.0% |
| 2002 | 0.19x | Skr11.49 Billion | Skr60.53 Billion | — |