Serstech AB Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: -0.91x

Serstech AB cash flow-to-debt ratio. Serstech AB (SERT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.91x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of Skr-7.78 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (Skr8.52 Million) in one year. Check Serstech AB earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.91x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

Skr-7.78 Million
SEK

Total Liabilities

Skr8.52 Million
SEK

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Serstech AB (2009–2024)

Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Serstech AB from 2009 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Serstech AB across 13 annual periods. Check how aggressively does Serstech AB reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

Serstech AB Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2009–2024)

Serstech AB cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2009 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Serstech AB. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Serstech AB (SERT) cash conversion ratio.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (SEK) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.03x Skr562.00K Skr18.16 Million ▼ -95.2%
2023 0.65x Skr7.63 Million Skr11.74 Million ▲ +228.1%
2022 -0.51x Skr-13.16 Million Skr25.93 Million ▼ -744.3%
2021 -0.06x Skr-628.00K Skr10.45 Million ▼ -120.9%
2020 0.29x Skr3.56 Million Skr12.38 Million ▲ +131.1%
2019 -0.92x Skr-10.59 Million Skr11.46 Million ▲ +52.2%
2018 -1.93x Skr-11.82 Million Skr6.12 Million ▼ -607.1%
2017 0.38x Skr5.89 Million Skr15.47 Million ▲ +140.9%
2016 -0.93x Skr-11.82 Million Skr12.70 Million ▼ -246.1%
2015 -0.27x Skr-3.08 Million Skr11.47 Million ▲ +75.6%
2012 -1.10x Skr-1.87 Million Skr1.69 Million ▼ -203.2%
2011 1.07x Skr2.85 Million Skr2.67 Million ▲ +267.6%
2009 0.29x Skr768.00K Skr2.64 Million —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.