Aberdeen International Inc. (AAB) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Aberdeen International Inc. (AAB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.32x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-762.25K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$2.41 Million) in one year. Explore Aberdeen International Inc. strategic investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Aberdeen International Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2002–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Aberdeen International Inc. across 24 annual periods. Also explore Aberdeen International Inc. assets under control for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Aberdeen International Inc. (2002–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Aberdeen International Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Aberdeen International Inc. stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | CA$67.92K | CA$2.73 Million | ▲ +146.8% |
| 2024 | 0.01x | CA$28.40K | CA$2.82 Million | ▲ +100.6% |
| 2023 | -1.60x | CA$-2.61 Million | CA$1.63 Million | ▼ -639.9% |
| 2022 | 0.30x | CA$689.97K | CA$2.33 Million | ▲ +148.3% |
| 2021 | -0.61x | CA$-1.14 Million | CA$1.86 Million | ▼ -137.9% |
| 2020 | -0.26x | CA$-419.36K | CA$1.63 Million | ▼ -18.1% |
| 2019 | -0.22x | CA$-179.06K | CA$820.50K | ▼ -152.0% |
| 2018 | -0.09x | CA$-320.97K | CA$3.71 Million | ▼ -107.1% |
| 2017 | 1.22x | CA$1.23 Million | CA$1.00 Million | ▲ +708.0% |
| 2016 | 0.15x | CA$458.50K | CA$3.03 Million | ▲ +123.6% |
| 2015 | -0.64x | CA$-2.63 Million | CA$4.09 Million | ▼ -126.9% |
| 2014 | 2.39x | CA$3.39 Million | CA$1.42 Million | ▲ +591.8% |
| 2013 | -0.49x | CA$-5.02 Million | CA$10.34 Million | ▼ -34.5% |
| 2012 | -0.36x | CA$-3.65 Million | CA$10.12 Million | ▼ -941.9% |
| 2011 | -0.03x | CA$-1.11 Million | CA$31.98 Million | ▼ -105.1% |
| 2010 | -0.02x | CA$-255.11K | CA$15.11 Million | ▼ -105.0% |
| 2009 | 0.34x | CA$4.24 Million | CA$12.61 Million | ▲ +29.8% |
| 2008 | 0.26x | CA$3.89 Million | CA$15.04 Million | ▼ -56.3% |
| 2007 | 0.59x | CA$2.02 Million | CA$3.42 Million | ▲ +410.6% |
| 2006 | -0.19x | CA$-729.97K | CA$3.83 Million | ▲ +96.6% |
| 2005 | -5.54x | CA$-467.74K | CA$84.50K | ▼ -3664.3% |
| 2004 | -0.15x | CA$-70.11K | CA$476.80K | ▲ +67.1% |
| 2003 | -0.45x | CA$-303.15K | CA$678.79K | ▼ -49.8% |
| 2002 | -0.30x | CA$-130.64K | CA$438.23K | — |