Aberdeen International Inc. (AAB) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Aberdeen International Inc. (AAB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.32x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-762.25K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$2.41 Million) in one year. See how financially flexible is Aberdeen International Inc. to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Aberdeen International Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2002–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Aberdeen International Inc. across 24 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Aberdeen International Inc. cash conversion from operations.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Aberdeen International Inc. (2002–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Aberdeen International Inc.. Check AAB cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | CA$67.92K | CA$2.73 Million | ▲ +146.8% |
| 2024 | 0.01x | CA$28.40K | CA$2.82 Million | ▲ +100.6% |
| 2023 | -1.60x | CA$-2.61 Million | CA$1.63 Million | ▼ -639.9% |
| 2022 | 0.30x | CA$689.97K | CA$2.33 Million | ▲ +148.3% |
| 2021 | -0.61x | CA$-1.14 Million | CA$1.86 Million | ▼ -137.9% |
| 2020 | -0.26x | CA$-419.36K | CA$1.63 Million | ▼ -18.1% |
| 2019 | -0.22x | CA$-179.06K | CA$820.50K | ▼ -152.0% |
| 2018 | -0.09x | CA$-320.97K | CA$3.71 Million | ▼ -107.1% |
| 2017 | 1.22x | CA$1.23 Million | CA$1.00 Million | ▲ +708.0% |
| 2016 | 0.15x | CA$458.50K | CA$3.03 Million | ▲ +123.6% |
| 2015 | -0.64x | CA$-2.63 Million | CA$4.09 Million | ▼ -126.9% |
| 2014 | 2.39x | CA$3.39 Million | CA$1.42 Million | ▲ +591.8% |
| 2013 | -0.49x | CA$-5.02 Million | CA$10.34 Million | ▼ -34.5% |
| 2012 | -0.36x | CA$-3.65 Million | CA$10.12 Million | ▼ -941.9% |
| 2011 | -0.03x | CA$-1.11 Million | CA$31.98 Million | ▼ -105.1% |
| 2010 | -0.02x | CA$-255.11K | CA$15.11 Million | ▼ -105.0% |
| 2009 | 0.34x | CA$4.24 Million | CA$12.61 Million | ▲ +29.8% |
| 2008 | 0.26x | CA$3.89 Million | CA$15.04 Million | ▼ -56.3% |
| 2007 | 0.59x | CA$2.02 Million | CA$3.42 Million | ▲ +410.6% |
| 2006 | -0.19x | CA$-729.97K | CA$3.83 Million | ▲ +96.6% |
| 2005 | -5.54x | CA$-467.74K | CA$84.50K | ▼ -3664.3% |
| 2004 | -0.15x | CA$-70.11K | CA$476.80K | ▲ +67.1% |
| 2003 | -0.45x | CA$-303.15K | CA$678.79K | ▼ -49.8% |
| 2002 | -0.30x | CA$-130.64K | CA$438.23K | — |