Barrick Gold Corp (ABX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Barrick Gold Corp (ABX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.18x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$2.87 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$15.63 Billion) in one year. Explore long-term investment intensity of Barrick Gold Corp to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Barrick Gold Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Barrick Gold Corp across 31 annual periods. Also explore ABX total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Barrick Gold Corp (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Barrick Gold Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Barrick Gold Corp (ABX) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.52x | CA$8.08 Billion | CA$15.63 Billion | ▲ +65.4% |
| 2024 | 0.31x | CA$4.49 Billion | CA$14.37 Billion | ▲ +15.6% |
| 2023 | 0.27x | CA$3.73 Billion | CA$13.81 Billion | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2022 | 0.24x | CA$3.48 Billion | CA$14.68 Billion | ▼ -21.0% |
| 2021 | 0.30x | CA$4.38 Billion | CA$14.58 Billion | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2020 | 0.37x | CA$5.42 Billion | CA$14.80 Billion | ▲ +88.2% |
| 2019 | 0.19x | CA$2.83 Billion | CA$14.56 Billion | ▲ +46.0% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | CA$1.76 Billion | CA$13.25 Billion | ▼ -8.1% |
| 2017 | 0.15x | CA$2.06 Billion | CA$14.24 Billion | ▼ -17.9% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | CA$2.64 Billion | CA$14.95 Billion | ▲ +6.5% |
| 2015 | 0.17x | CA$2.79 Billion | CA$16.85 Billion | ▲ +51.8% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | CA$2.30 Billion | CA$21.02 Billion | ▼ -44.7% |
| 2013 | 0.20x | CA$4.24 Billion | CA$21.45 Billion | ▼ -17.2% |
| 2012 | 0.24x | CA$5.44 Billion | CA$22.77 Billion | ▲ +4.8% |
| 2011 | 0.23x | CA$5.32 Billion | CA$23.33 Billion | ▼ -30.5% |
| 2010 | 0.33x | CA$4.13 Billion | CA$12.59 Billion | ▲ +262.8% |
| 2009 | -0.20x | CA$-2.32 Billion | CA$11.53 Billion | ▼ -179.5% |
| 2008 | 0.25x | CA$2.21 Billion | CA$8.70 Billion | ▼ -4.4% |
| 2007 | 0.27x | CA$1.75 Billion | CA$6.61 Billion | ▼ -11.6% |
| 2006 | 0.30x | CA$2.15 Billion | CA$7.17 Billion | ▲ +24.4% |
| 2005 | 0.24x | CA$725.77 Million | CA$3.01 Billion | ▲ +29.1% |
| 2004 | 0.19x | CA$505.88 Million | CA$2.71 Billion | ▼ -40.2% |
| 2003 | 0.31x | CA$582.98 Million | CA$1.87 Billion | ▲ +0.9% |
| 2002 | 0.31x | CA$651.97 Million | CA$2.11 Billion | ▲ +3.1% |
| 2001 | 0.30x | CA$679.11 Million | CA$2.26 Billion | ▼ -35.7% |
| 2000 | 0.47x | CA$704.76 Million | CA$1.51 Billion | ▼ -20.4% |
| 1999 | 0.59x | CA$702.01 Million | CA$1.20 Billion | ▲ +15.5% |
| 1998 | 0.51x | CA$539.05 Million | CA$1.06 Billion | ▲ +5.9% |
| 1997 | 0.48x | CA$470.02 Million | CA$982.02 Million | ▲ +4.8% |
| 1996 | 0.46x | CA$462.97 Million | CA$1.01 Billion | ▼ -46.4% |
| 1995 | 0.85x | CA$502.38 Million | CA$590.03 Million | — |