Barrick Gold Corp (ABX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Barrick Gold Corp (ABX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.18x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$2.87 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$15.63 Billion) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Barrick Gold Corp to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Barrick Gold Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Barrick Gold Corp across 31 annual periods. Also explore Barrick Gold Corp net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Barrick Gold Corp (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Barrick Gold Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see ABX market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.52x | CA$8.08 Billion | CA$15.63 Billion | ▲ +65.4% |
| 2024 | 0.31x | CA$4.49 Billion | CA$14.37 Billion | ▲ +15.6% |
| 2023 | 0.27x | CA$3.73 Billion | CA$13.81 Billion | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2022 | 0.24x | CA$3.48 Billion | CA$14.68 Billion | ▼ -21.0% |
| 2021 | 0.30x | CA$4.38 Billion | CA$14.58 Billion | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2020 | 0.37x | CA$5.42 Billion | CA$14.80 Billion | ▲ +88.2% |
| 2019 | 0.19x | CA$2.83 Billion | CA$14.56 Billion | ▲ +46.0% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | CA$1.76 Billion | CA$13.25 Billion | ▼ -8.1% |
| 2017 | 0.15x | CA$2.06 Billion | CA$14.24 Billion | ▼ -17.9% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | CA$2.64 Billion | CA$14.95 Billion | ▲ +6.5% |
| 2015 | 0.17x | CA$2.79 Billion | CA$16.85 Billion | ▲ +51.8% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | CA$2.30 Billion | CA$21.02 Billion | ▼ -44.7% |
| 2013 | 0.20x | CA$4.24 Billion | CA$21.45 Billion | ▼ -17.2% |
| 2012 | 0.24x | CA$5.44 Billion | CA$22.77 Billion | ▲ +4.8% |
| 2011 | 0.23x | CA$5.32 Billion | CA$23.33 Billion | ▼ -30.5% |
| 2010 | 0.33x | CA$4.13 Billion | CA$12.59 Billion | ▲ +262.8% |
| 2009 | -0.20x | CA$-2.32 Billion | CA$11.53 Billion | ▼ -179.5% |
| 2008 | 0.25x | CA$2.21 Billion | CA$8.70 Billion | ▼ -4.4% |
| 2007 | 0.27x | CA$1.75 Billion | CA$6.61 Billion | ▼ -11.6% |
| 2006 | 0.30x | CA$2.15 Billion | CA$7.17 Billion | ▲ +24.4% |
| 2005 | 0.24x | CA$725.77 Million | CA$3.01 Billion | ▲ +29.1% |
| 2004 | 0.19x | CA$505.88 Million | CA$2.71 Billion | ▼ -40.2% |
| 2003 | 0.31x | CA$582.98 Million | CA$1.87 Billion | ▲ +0.9% |
| 2002 | 0.31x | CA$651.97 Million | CA$2.11 Billion | ▲ +3.1% |
| 2001 | 0.30x | CA$679.11 Million | CA$2.26 Billion | ▼ -35.7% |
| 2000 | 0.47x | CA$704.76 Million | CA$1.51 Billion | ▼ -20.4% |
| 1999 | 0.59x | CA$702.01 Million | CA$1.20 Billion | ▲ +15.5% |
| 1998 | 0.51x | CA$539.05 Million | CA$1.06 Billion | ▲ +5.9% |
| 1997 | 0.48x | CA$470.02 Million | CA$982.02 Million | ▲ +4.8% |
| 1996 | 0.46x | CA$462.97 Million | CA$1.01 Billion | ▼ -46.4% |
| 1995 | 0.85x | CA$502.38 Million | CA$590.03 Million | — |