Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp (AQN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp (AQN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$417.60 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$8.71 Billion) in one year. See Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp across 28 annual periods. Also explore Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp (1997–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see AQN stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.04x | CA$458.59 Million | CA$10.78 Billion | ▼ -23.8% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | CA$638.22 Million | CA$11.43 Billion | ▼ -2.7% |
| 2022 | 0.06x | CA$600.67 Million | CA$10.47 Billion | ▲ +237.0% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | CA$154.82 Million | CA$9.10 Billion | ▼ -76.8% |
| 2020 | 0.07x | CA$530.84 Million | CA$7.23 Billion | ▼ -25.5% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | CA$609.17 Million | CA$6.18 Billion | ▲ +4.6% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | CA$504.81 Million | CA$5.36 Billion | ▲ +31.4% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | CA$359.93 Million | CA$5.02 Billion | ▲ +43.5% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | CA$212.96 Million | CA$4.27 Billion | ▼ -49.4% |
| 2015 | 0.10x | CA$190.02 Million | CA$1.93 Billion | ▲ +9.9% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | CA$174.58 Million | CA$1.95 Billion | ▲ +71.7% |
| 2013 | 0.05x | CA$98.86 Million | CA$1.89 Billion | ▲ +13.7% |
| 2012 | 0.05x | CA$63.45 Million | CA$1.38 Billion | ▼ -52.1% |
| 2011 | 0.10x | CA$68.55 Million | CA$714.88 Million | ▲ +34.2% |
| 2010 | 0.07x | CA$45.17 Million | CA$631.89 Million | ▼ -25.7% |
| 2009 | 0.10x | CA$47.29 Million | CA$491.59 Million | ▼ -31.6% |
| 2008 | 0.14x | CA$72.06 Million | CA$512.50 Million | ▲ +96.4% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | CA$41.06 Million | CA$573.43 Million | ▼ -40.1% |
| 2006 | 0.12x | CA$58.62 Million | CA$490.57 Million | ▼ -20.1% |
| 2005 | 0.15x | CA$47.75 Million | CA$319.27 Million | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2004 | 0.20x | CA$55.16 Million | CA$273.37 Million | ▼ -1.1% |
| 2003 | 0.20x | CA$44.89 Million | CA$220.05 Million | ▼ -3.7% |
| 2002 | 0.21x | CA$23.10 Million | CA$109.00 Million | ▼ -27.8% |
| 2001 | 0.29x | CA$18.58 Million | CA$63.30 Million | ▲ +41.9% |
| 2000 | 0.21x | CA$15.03 Million | CA$72.65 Million | ▲ +87.4% |
| 1999 | 0.11x | CA$9.20 Million | CA$83.38 Million | ▼ -82.5% |
| 1998 | 0.63x | CA$4.57 Million | CA$7.25 Million | ▲ +358.3% |
| 1997 | 0.14x | CA$631.31K | CA$4.59 Million | — |