ATS CORP Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
ATS CORP cash flow-to-debt ratio. ATS CORP (ATS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$114.61 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$2.70 Billion) in one year. Check ATS cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of ATS CORP (1994–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of ATS CORP from 1994 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for ATS CORP across 32 annual periods. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of ATS CORP to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
ATS CORP Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1994–2025)
ATS CORP cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1994 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for ATS CORP. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of ATS CORP.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.01x | CA$25.77 Million | CA$2.91 Billion | ▲ +2.4% |
| 2024 | 0.01x | CA$20.78 Million | CA$2.40 Billion | ▼ -83.7% |
| 2023 | 0.05x | CA$127.80 Million | CA$2.41 Billion | ▼ -49.0% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | CA$216.16 Million | CA$2.08 Billion | ▼ -28.1% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | CA$185.16 Million | CA$1.28 Billion | ▲ +771.4% |
| 2020 | 0.02x | CA$20.35 Million | CA$1.23 Billion | ▼ -88.3% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | CA$127.60 Million | CA$899.21 Million | ▲ +86.3% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | CA$59.69 Million | CA$783.45 Million | ▼ -59.0% |
| 2017 | 0.19x | CA$127.90 Million | CA$688.56 Million | ▲ +272.4% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | CA$35.76 Million | CA$716.91 Million | ▼ -59.7% |
| 2015 | 0.12x | CA$80.52 Million | CA$649.94 Million | ▼ -48.6% |
| 2014 | 0.24x | CA$62.93 Million | CA$260.85 Million | ▲ +64.3% |
| 2013 | 0.15x | CA$26.67 Million | CA$181.70 Million | ▲ +205.6% |
| 2012 | -0.14x | CA$-26.03 Million | CA$187.18 Million | ▼ -199.1% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | CA$40.72 Million | CA$290.15 Million | ▼ -44.8% |
| 2010 | 0.25x | CA$56.61 Million | CA$222.59 Million | ▼ -8.8% |
| 2009 | 0.28x | CA$74.60 Million | CA$267.62 Million | ▲ +4832.0% |
| 2008 | -0.01x | CA$-1.35 Million | CA$228.82 Million | ▼ -114.9% |
| 2007 | 0.04x | CA$9.43 Million | CA$237.80 Million | ▼ -82.1% |
| 2006 | 0.22x | CA$48.24 Million | CA$217.81 Million | ▼ -31.6% |
| 2005 | 0.32x | CA$66.40 Million | CA$204.93 Million | ▲ +65.5% |
| 2004 | 0.20x | CA$38.39 Million | CA$196.10 Million | ▼ -0.5% |
| 2003 | 0.20x | CA$32.59 Million | CA$165.66 Million | ▼ -65.6% |
| 2002 | 0.57x | CA$93.95 Million | CA$164.53 Million | ▲ +1160.2% |
| 2001 | 0.05x | CA$8.31 Million | CA$183.42 Million | ▲ +190.4% |
| 2000 | -0.05x | CA$-10.10 Million | CA$201.50 Million | ▼ -109.5% |
| 1999 | 0.53x | CA$86.60 Million | CA$164.80 Million | ▲ +2024.3% |
| 1998 | -0.03x | CA$-4.20 Million | CA$153.80 Million | ▼ -139.6% |
| 1997 | 0.07x | CA$6.40 Million | CA$92.70 Million | ▲ +809.9% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | CA$500.00K | CA$65.90 Million | ▼ -95.9% |
| 1995 | 0.19x | CA$11.40 Million | CA$61.50 Million | ▲ +14.6% |
| 1994 | 0.16x | CA$6.10 Million | CA$37.70 Million | — |