Ballard Power Systems Inc (BLDP) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Ballard Power Systems Inc (BLDP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.22x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-22.86 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$103.64 Million) in one year. See cash generation quality of Ballard Power Systems Inc to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Ballard Power Systems Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Ballard Power Systems Inc across 32 annual periods. Also explore Ballard Power Systems Inc equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Ballard Power Systems Inc (1993–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Ballard Power Systems Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Ballard Power Systems Inc (BLDP) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -1.04x | CA$-108.10 Million | CA$104.32 Million | ▲ +14.5% |
| 2023 | -1.21x | CA$-104.57 Million | CA$86.33 Million | ▲ +19.2% |
| 2022 | -1.50x | CA$-132.20 Million | CA$88.17 Million | ▼ -110.0% |
| 2021 | -0.71x | CA$-80.48 Million | CA$112.73 Million | ▼ -24.2% |
| 2020 | -0.57x | CA$-42.93 Million | CA$74.71 Million | ▼ -263.7% |
| 2019 | -0.16x | CA$-14.23 Million | CA$90.06 Million | ▲ +68.3% |
| 2018 | -0.50x | CA$-31.69 Million | CA$63.50 Million | ▼ -195.3% |
| 2017 | -0.17x | CA$-9.77 Million | CA$57.80 Million | ▼ -168.0% |
| 2016 | -0.06x | CA$-3.90 Million | CA$61.90 Million | ▲ +87.6% |
| 2015 | -0.51x | CA$-25.36 Million | CA$49.72 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2014 | -0.42x | CA$-20.67 Million | CA$48.72 Million | ▼ -21.7% |
| 2013 | -0.35x | CA$-17.42 Million | CA$49.96 Million | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2012 | -0.40x | CA$-28.15 Million | CA$69.55 Million | ▲ +11.1% |
| 2011 | -0.46x | CA$-33.22 Million | CA$72.94 Million | ▲ +3.8% |
| 2010 | -0.47x | CA$-29.31 Million | CA$61.91 Million | ▲ +36.0% |
| 2009 | -0.74x | CA$-26.96 Million | CA$36.43 Million | ▼ -33.0% |
| 2008 | -0.56x | CA$-26.21 Million | CA$47.11 Million | ▲ +28.9% |
| 2007 | -0.78x | CA$-31.68 Million | CA$40.50 Million | ▲ +17.6% |
| 2006 | -0.95x | CA$-42.67 Million | CA$44.95 Million | ▲ +35.6% |
| 2005 | -1.47x | CA$-76.73 Million | CA$52.06 Million | ▼ -58.4% |
| 2004 | -0.93x | CA$-78.26 Million | CA$84.08 Million | ▼ -102.7% |
| 2003 | -0.46x | CA$-42.77 Million | CA$93.13 Million | ▲ +67.9% |
| 2002 | -1.43x | CA$-126.45 Million | CA$88.29 Million | ▼ -123.8% |
| 2001 | -0.64x | CA$-54.79 Million | CA$85.60 Million | ▲ +33.0% |
| 2000 | -0.96x | CA$-39.67 Million | CA$41.52 Million | ▲ +31.2% |
| 1999 | -1.39x | CA$-45.40 Million | CA$32.69 Million | ▼ -2302.0% |
| 1998 | -0.06x | CA$-1.70 Million | CA$29.40 Million | ▲ +87.1% |
| 1997 | -0.45x | CA$-9.80 Million | CA$21.90 Million | ▲ +41.5% |
| 1996 | -0.77x | CA$-10.10 Million | CA$13.20 Million | ▲ +8.7% |
| 1995 | -0.84x | CA$-8.80 Million | CA$10.50 Million | ▼ -11665.7% |
| 1994 | 0.01x | CA$100.00K | CA$13.80 Million | ▼ -96.7% |
| 1993 | 0.22x | CA$1.88 Million | CA$8.51 Million | — |