Burcon NutraScience Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Burcon NutraScience Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Burcon NutraScience Corporation (BU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.06x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.59 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$26.46 Million) in one year. Check earnings quality score of Burcon NutraScience Corporation to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Burcon NutraScience Corporation (1999–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Burcon NutraScience Corporation from 1999 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Burcon NutraScience Corporation across 27 annual periods. Check Burcon NutraScience Corporation investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Burcon NutraScience Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1999–2025)
Burcon NutraScience Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1999 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Burcon NutraScience Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Burcon NutraScience Corporation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.23x | CA$-5.51 Million | CA$23.71 Million | ▲ +68.8% |
| 2024 | -0.74x | CA$-5.78 Million | CA$7.76 Million | ▲ +28.7% |
| 2023 | -1.04x | CA$-6.02 Million | CA$5.76 Million | ▲ +80.5% |
| 2022 | -5.36x | CA$-5.91 Million | CA$1.10 Million | ▼ -156.7% |
| 2021 | -2.09x | CA$-3.03 Million | CA$1.45 Million | ▼ -535.1% |
| 2020 | -0.33x | CA$-2.74 Million | CA$8.32 Million | ▲ +64.7% |
| 2019 | -0.93x | CA$-4.15 Million | CA$4.44 Million | ▲ +37.6% |
| 2018 | -1.49x | CA$-4.62 Million | CA$3.09 Million | ▲ +13.1% |
| 2017 | -1.72x | CA$-4.61 Million | CA$2.68 Million | ▲ +73.9% |
| 2016 | -6.59x | CA$-4.88 Million | CA$740.85K | ▼ -24.3% |
| 2015 | -5.30x | CA$-4.82 Million | CA$908.38K | ▲ +14.3% |
| 2014 | -6.19x | CA$-4.95 Million | CA$799.67K | ▲ +0.2% |
| 2013 | -6.20x | CA$-4.77 Million | CA$768.48K | ▼ -61.8% |
| 2012 | -3.84x | CA$-4.37 Million | CA$1.14 Million | ▼ -40.4% |
| 2011 | -2.73x | CA$-3.63 Million | CA$1.33 Million | ▲ +71.2% |
| 2010 | -9.48x | CA$-3.80 Million | CA$401.18K | ▼ -10.2% |
| 2009 | -8.60x | CA$-2.98 Million | CA$346.73K | ▲ +31.5% |
| 2008 | -12.56x | CA$-2.72 Million | CA$216.33K | ▼ -56.5% |
| 2007 | -8.02x | CA$-2.37 Million | CA$295.55K | ▲ +13.7% |
| 2006 | -9.30x | CA$-1.88 Million | CA$201.58K | ▲ +31.3% |
| 2005 | -13.55x | CA$-2.43 Million | CA$179.53K | ▼ -77.3% |
| 2004 | -7.64x | CA$-2.13 Million | CA$278.42K | ▲ +39.7% |
| 2003 | -12.67x | CA$-3.00 Million | CA$237.10K | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2002 | -10.74x | CA$-2.95 Million | CA$275.05K | ▼ -116.1% |
| 2001 | -4.97x | CA$-1.43 Million | CA$287.46K | ▲ +27.8% |
| 2000 | -6.88x | CA$-499.97K | CA$72.68K | ▼ -1587.5% |
| 1999 | -0.41x | CA$-5.56K | CA$13.64K | — |