Burcon NutraScience Corporation (BU) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Burcon NutraScience Corporation (BU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.06x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.59 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$26.46 Million) in one year. See BU free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Burcon NutraScience Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Burcon NutraScience Corporation across 27 annual periods. Also explore BU net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Burcon NutraScience Corporation (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Burcon NutraScience Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Burcon NutraScience Corporation stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.23x | CA$-5.51 Million | CA$23.71 Million | ▲ +68.8% |
| 2024 | -0.74x | CA$-5.78 Million | CA$7.76 Million | ▲ +28.7% |
| 2023 | -1.04x | CA$-6.02 Million | CA$5.76 Million | ▲ +80.5% |
| 2022 | -5.36x | CA$-5.91 Million | CA$1.10 Million | ▼ -156.7% |
| 2021 | -2.09x | CA$-3.03 Million | CA$1.45 Million | ▼ -535.1% |
| 2020 | -0.33x | CA$-2.74 Million | CA$8.32 Million | ▲ +64.7% |
| 2019 | -0.93x | CA$-4.15 Million | CA$4.44 Million | ▲ +37.6% |
| 2018 | -1.49x | CA$-4.62 Million | CA$3.09 Million | ▲ +13.1% |
| 2017 | -1.72x | CA$-4.61 Million | CA$2.68 Million | ▲ +73.9% |
| 2016 | -6.59x | CA$-4.88 Million | CA$740.85K | ▼ -24.3% |
| 2015 | -5.30x | CA$-4.82 Million | CA$908.38K | ▲ +14.3% |
| 2014 | -6.19x | CA$-4.95 Million | CA$799.67K | ▲ +0.2% |
| 2013 | -6.20x | CA$-4.77 Million | CA$768.48K | ▼ -61.8% |
| 2012 | -3.84x | CA$-4.37 Million | CA$1.14 Million | ▼ -40.4% |
| 2011 | -2.73x | CA$-3.63 Million | CA$1.33 Million | ▲ +71.2% |
| 2010 | -9.48x | CA$-3.80 Million | CA$401.18K | ▼ -10.2% |
| 2009 | -8.60x | CA$-2.98 Million | CA$346.73K | ▲ +31.5% |
| 2008 | -12.56x | CA$-2.72 Million | CA$216.33K | ▼ -56.5% |
| 2007 | -8.02x | CA$-2.37 Million | CA$295.55K | ▲ +13.7% |
| 2006 | -9.30x | CA$-1.88 Million | CA$201.58K | ▲ +31.3% |
| 2005 | -13.55x | CA$-2.43 Million | CA$179.53K | ▼ -77.3% |
| 2004 | -7.64x | CA$-2.13 Million | CA$278.42K | ▲ +39.7% |
| 2003 | -12.67x | CA$-3.00 Million | CA$237.10K | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2002 | -10.74x | CA$-2.95 Million | CA$275.05K | ▼ -116.1% |
| 2001 | -4.97x | CA$-1.43 Million | CA$287.46K | ▲ +27.8% |
| 2000 | -6.88x | CA$-499.97K | CA$72.68K | ▼ -1587.5% |
| 1999 | -0.41x | CA$-5.56K | CA$13.64K | — |