Burcon NutraScience Corporation (BU) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Burcon NutraScience Corporation (BU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.06x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.59 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$26.46 Million) in one year. Explore BU long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Burcon NutraScience Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Burcon NutraScience Corporation across 27 annual periods. Also explore Burcon NutraScience Corporation asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Burcon NutraScience Corporation (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Burcon NutraScience Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see BU market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.23x | CA$-5.51 Million | CA$23.71 Million | ▲ +68.8% |
| 2024 | -0.74x | CA$-5.78 Million | CA$7.76 Million | ▲ +28.7% |
| 2023 | -1.04x | CA$-6.02 Million | CA$5.76 Million | ▲ +80.5% |
| 2022 | -5.36x | CA$-5.91 Million | CA$1.10 Million | ▼ -156.7% |
| 2021 | -2.09x | CA$-3.03 Million | CA$1.45 Million | ▼ -535.1% |
| 2020 | -0.33x | CA$-2.74 Million | CA$8.32 Million | ▲ +64.7% |
| 2019 | -0.93x | CA$-4.15 Million | CA$4.44 Million | ▲ +37.6% |
| 2018 | -1.49x | CA$-4.62 Million | CA$3.09 Million | ▲ +13.1% |
| 2017 | -1.72x | CA$-4.61 Million | CA$2.68 Million | ▲ +73.9% |
| 2016 | -6.59x | CA$-4.88 Million | CA$740.85K | ▼ -24.3% |
| 2015 | -5.30x | CA$-4.82 Million | CA$908.38K | ▲ +14.3% |
| 2014 | -6.19x | CA$-4.95 Million | CA$799.67K | ▲ +0.2% |
| 2013 | -6.20x | CA$-4.77 Million | CA$768.48K | ▼ -61.8% |
| 2012 | -3.84x | CA$-4.37 Million | CA$1.14 Million | ▼ -40.4% |
| 2011 | -2.73x | CA$-3.63 Million | CA$1.33 Million | ▲ +71.2% |
| 2010 | -9.48x | CA$-3.80 Million | CA$401.18K | ▼ -10.2% |
| 2009 | -8.60x | CA$-2.98 Million | CA$346.73K | ▲ +31.5% |
| 2008 | -12.56x | CA$-2.72 Million | CA$216.33K | ▼ -56.5% |
| 2007 | -8.02x | CA$-2.37 Million | CA$295.55K | ▲ +13.7% |
| 2006 | -9.30x | CA$-1.88 Million | CA$201.58K | ▲ +31.3% |
| 2005 | -13.55x | CA$-2.43 Million | CA$179.53K | ▼ -77.3% |
| 2004 | -7.64x | CA$-2.13 Million | CA$278.42K | ▲ +39.7% |
| 2003 | -12.67x | CA$-3.00 Million | CA$237.10K | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2002 | -10.74x | CA$-2.95 Million | CA$275.05K | ▼ -116.1% |
| 2001 | -4.97x | CA$-1.43 Million | CA$287.46K | ▲ +27.8% |
| 2000 | -6.88x | CA$-499.97K | CA$72.68K | ▼ -1587.5% |
| 1999 | -0.41x | CA$-5.56K | CA$13.64K | — |