Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (CAR-UN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (CAR-UN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$75.78 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$6.41 Billion) in one year. See Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estat (CAR-UN) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust across 29 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CAR-UN cash flow metrics.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust. Check how high is Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estat's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | CA$568.82 Million | CA$6.37 Billion | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2024 | 0.10x | CA$648.85 Million | CA$6.55 Billion | ▲ +23.7% |
| 2023 | 0.08x | CA$615.92 Million | CA$7.69 Billion | ▲ +3.6% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | CA$598.03 Million | CA$7.74 Billion | ▲ +2.5% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | CA$551.43 Million | CA$7.31 Billion | ▼ -2.5% |
| 2020 | 0.08x | CA$481.36 Million | CA$6.23 Billion | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | CA$454.63 Million | CA$5.61 Billion | ▼ -15.0% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | CA$431.18 Million | CA$4.53 Billion | ▲ +13.2% |
| 2017 | 0.08x | CA$358.94 Million | CA$4.26 Billion | ▼ -13.0% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | CA$361.36 Million | CA$3.73 Billion | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | CA$292.82 Million | CA$3.44 Billion | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | CA$283.98 Million | CA$2.94 Billion | ▲ +3.9% |
| 2013 | 0.09x | CA$260.28 Million | CA$2.80 Billion | ▲ +10.2% |
| 2012 | 0.08x | CA$210.22 Million | CA$2.49 Billion | ▼ -7.9% |
| 2011 | 0.09x | CA$189.01 Million | CA$2.06 Billion | ▲ +79.2% |
| 2010 | 0.05x | CA$89.81 Million | CA$1.76 Billion | ▲ +22.5% |
| 2009 | 0.04x | CA$76.05 Million | CA$1.82 Billion | ▼ -14.8% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | CA$86.05 Million | CA$1.76 Billion | ▲ +14.8% |
| 2007 | 0.04x | CA$71.54 Million | CA$1.68 Billion | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2006 | 0.05x | CA$68.41 Million | CA$1.43 Billion | ▲ +5.2% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | CA$61.76 Million | CA$1.36 Billion | ▼ -7.3% |
| 2004 | 0.05x | CA$63.24 Million | CA$1.29 Billion | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2003 | 0.06x | CA$36.59 Million | CA$569.08 Million | ▼ -8.0% |
| 2002 | 0.07x | CA$36.31 Million | CA$519.51 Million | ▼ -4.9% |
| 2001 | 0.07x | CA$27.06 Million | CA$368.08 Million | ▼ -2.7% |
| 2000 | 0.08x | CA$24.48 Million | CA$324.19 Million | ▲ +52.2% |
| 1999 | 0.05x | CA$12.82 Million | CA$258.32 Million | ▼ -25.5% |
| 1998 | 0.07x | CA$13.28 Million | CA$199.27 Million | ▲ +123.4% |
| 1997 | 0.03x | CA$4.84 Million | CA$162.12 Million | — |