Cascades Inc. (CAS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Cascades Inc. (CAS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$116.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$3.01 Billion) in one year. See CAS FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cascades Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Cascades Inc. across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Cascades Inc. (CAS) cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Cascades Inc. (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Cascades Inc.. Check Cascades Inc. earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.13x | CA$379.00 Million | CA$2.92 Billion | ▲ +54.2% |
| 2024 | 0.08x | CA$272.00 Million | CA$3.23 Billion | ▼ -50.6% |
| 2023 | 0.17x | CA$510.00 Million | CA$2.99 Billion | ▲ +270.0% |
| 2022 | 0.05x | CA$144.00 Million | CA$3.12 Billion | ▼ -42.4% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | CA$211.00 Million | CA$2.64 Billion | ▼ -52.9% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | CA$587.00 Million | CA$3.46 Billion | ▲ +29.8% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | CA$460.00 Million | CA$3.51 Billion | ▲ +14.5% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | CA$373.00 Million | CA$3.26 Billion | ▲ +83.8% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | CA$173.00 Million | CA$2.78 Billion | ▼ -54.2% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | CA$372.00 Million | CA$2.74 Billion | ▲ +38.0% |
| 2015 | 0.10x | CA$284.00 Million | CA$2.88 Billion | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | CA$231.00 Million | CA$2.67 Billion | ▼ -1.7% |
| 2013 | 0.09x | CA$232.00 Million | CA$2.64 Billion | ▲ +12.7% |
| 2012 | 0.08x | CA$203.00 Million | CA$2.60 Billion | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2011 | 0.16x | CA$402.00 Million | CA$2.57 Billion | ▲ +65.0% |
| 2010 | 0.09x | CA$232.00 Million | CA$2.44 Billion | ▼ -33.3% |
| 2009 | 0.14x | CA$354.00 Million | CA$2.49 Billion | ▲ +125.1% |
| 2008 | 0.06x | CA$174.00 Million | CA$2.75 Billion | ▲ +228.3% |
| 2007 | 0.02x | CA$49.00 Million | CA$2.54 Billion | ▼ -80.9% |
| 2006 | 0.10x | CA$275.00 Million | CA$2.73 Billion | ▲ +120.5% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | CA$98.00 Million | CA$2.15 Billion | ▼ -39.1% |
| 2004 | 0.07x | CA$156.00 Million | CA$2.08 Billion | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.07x | CA$140.00 Million | CA$1.87 Billion | ▼ -56.4% |
| 2002 | 0.17x | CA$325.00 Million | CA$1.89 Billion | ▲ +1.8% |
| 2001 | 0.17x | CA$314.00 Million | CA$1.86 Billion | ▲ +82.5% |
| 2000 | 0.09x | CA$169.00 Million | CA$1.83 Billion | ▲ +4.9% |
| 1999 | 0.09x | CA$141.00 Million | CA$1.60 Billion | ▼ -20.9% |
| 1998 | 0.11x | CA$186.00 Million | CA$1.67 Billion | ▲ +47.9% |
| 1997 | 0.08x | CA$116.80 Million | CA$1.55 Billion | ▼ -54.6% |
| 1996 | 0.17x | CA$195.40 Million | CA$1.18 Billion | — |