Canagold Resources Ltd (CCM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Canagold Resources Ltd (CCM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-208.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$4.45 Million) in one year. See Canagold Resources Ltd (CCM) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Canagold Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Canagold Resources Ltd across 30 annual periods. Also explore CCM shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Canagold Resources Ltd (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Canagold Resources Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see CCM stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.18x | CA$-817.00K | CA$4.45 Million | ▼ -39.5% |
| 2024 | -0.13x | CA$-364.00K | CA$2.77 Million | ▲ +81.1% |
| 2023 | -0.70x | CA$-1.73 Million | CA$2.49 Million | ▼ -63.1% |
| 2022 | -0.43x | CA$-1.33 Million | CA$3.12 Million | ▲ +38.3% |
| 2021 | -0.69x | CA$-893.00K | CA$1.29 Million | ▲ +74.1% |
| 2020 | -2.67x | CA$-1.41 Million | CA$526.00K | ▼ -29.3% |
| 2019 | -2.07x | CA$-813.00K | CA$393.00K | ▲ +4.1% |
| 2018 | -2.16x | CA$-921.00K | CA$427.00K | ▲ +24.4% |
| 2017 | -2.85x | CA$-1.09 Million | CA$383.00K | ▲ +86.4% |
| 2016 | -21.05x | CA$-2.13 Million | CA$101.00K | ▼ -3962.1% |
| 2015 | -0.52x | CA$-584.00K | CA$1.13 Million | ▲ +65.3% |
| 2014 | -1.49x | CA$-1.36 Million | CA$914.00K | ▼ -243.4% |
| 2013 | -0.43x | CA$-468.00K | CA$1.08 Million | ▲ +60.0% |
| 2012 | -1.09x | CA$-1.01 Million | CA$929.00K | ▲ +11.3% |
| 2011 | -1.23x | CA$-990.00K | CA$807.00K | ▼ -33.7% |
| 2010 | -0.92x | CA$-880.00K | CA$959.00K | ▼ -108.8% |
| 2009 | -0.44x | CA$-439.00K | CA$999.00K | ▲ +77.6% |
| 2008 | -1.96x | CA$-600.00K | CA$306.00K | ▲ +4.6% |
| 2007 | -2.06x | CA$-1.30 Million | CA$634.38K | ▲ +63.9% |
| 2006 | -5.69x | CA$-1.34 Million | CA$235.21K | ▼ -84.3% |
| 2005 | -3.09x | CA$-724.91K | CA$234.76K | ▼ -55.7% |
| 2004 | -1.98x | CA$-775.07K | CA$390.87K | ▼ -171.3% |
| 2003 | -0.73x | CA$-246.86K | CA$337.68K | ▲ +92.4% |
| 2002 | -9.66x | CA$-306.92K | CA$31.77K | ▼ -116.9% |
| 2001 | -4.45x | CA$-481.22K | CA$108.05K | ▼ -276.1% |
| 2000 | -1.18x | CA$-428.72K | CA$362.05K | ▼ -77.6% |
| 1999 | -0.67x | CA$-276.49K | CA$414.74K | ▲ +91.1% |
| 1998 | -7.50x | CA$-969.05K | CA$129.21K | ▼ -34.6% |
| 1997 | -5.57x | CA$-2.73 Million | CA$489.68K | ▼ -56.0% |
| 1996 | -3.57x | CA$-1.82 Million | CA$510.76K | — |