Canagold Resources Ltd (CCM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Canagold Resources Ltd (CCM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-208.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$4.45 Million) in one year. See CCM financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Canagold Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Canagold Resources Ltd across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Canagold Resources Ltd cash conversion from operations.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Canagold Resources Ltd (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Canagold Resources Ltd. Check Canagold Resources Ltd (CCM) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.18x | CA$-817.00K | CA$4.45 Million | ▼ -39.5% |
| 2024 | -0.13x | CA$-364.00K | CA$2.77 Million | ▲ +81.1% |
| 2023 | -0.70x | CA$-1.73 Million | CA$2.49 Million | ▼ -63.1% |
| 2022 | -0.43x | CA$-1.33 Million | CA$3.12 Million | ▲ +38.3% |
| 2021 | -0.69x | CA$-893.00K | CA$1.29 Million | ▲ +74.1% |
| 2020 | -2.67x | CA$-1.41 Million | CA$526.00K | ▼ -29.3% |
| 2019 | -2.07x | CA$-813.00K | CA$393.00K | ▲ +4.1% |
| 2018 | -2.16x | CA$-921.00K | CA$427.00K | ▲ +24.4% |
| 2017 | -2.85x | CA$-1.09 Million | CA$383.00K | ▲ +86.4% |
| 2016 | -21.05x | CA$-2.13 Million | CA$101.00K | ▼ -3962.1% |
| 2015 | -0.52x | CA$-584.00K | CA$1.13 Million | ▲ +65.3% |
| 2014 | -1.49x | CA$-1.36 Million | CA$914.00K | ▼ -243.4% |
| 2013 | -0.43x | CA$-468.00K | CA$1.08 Million | ▲ +60.0% |
| 2012 | -1.09x | CA$-1.01 Million | CA$929.00K | ▲ +11.3% |
| 2011 | -1.23x | CA$-990.00K | CA$807.00K | ▼ -33.7% |
| 2010 | -0.92x | CA$-880.00K | CA$959.00K | ▼ -108.8% |
| 2009 | -0.44x | CA$-439.00K | CA$999.00K | ▲ +77.6% |
| 2008 | -1.96x | CA$-600.00K | CA$306.00K | ▲ +4.6% |
| 2007 | -2.06x | CA$-1.30 Million | CA$634.38K | ▲ +63.9% |
| 2006 | -5.69x | CA$-1.34 Million | CA$235.21K | ▼ -84.3% |
| 2005 | -3.09x | CA$-724.91K | CA$234.76K | ▼ -55.7% |
| 2004 | -1.98x | CA$-775.07K | CA$390.87K | ▼ -171.3% |
| 2003 | -0.73x | CA$-246.86K | CA$337.68K | ▲ +92.4% |
| 2002 | -9.66x | CA$-306.92K | CA$31.77K | ▼ -116.9% |
| 2001 | -4.45x | CA$-481.22K | CA$108.05K | ▼ -276.1% |
| 2000 | -1.18x | CA$-428.72K | CA$362.05K | ▼ -77.6% |
| 1999 | -0.67x | CA$-276.49K | CA$414.74K | ▲ +91.1% |
| 1998 | -7.50x | CA$-969.05K | CA$129.21K | ▼ -34.6% |
| 1997 | -5.57x | CA$-2.73 Million | CA$489.68K | ▼ -56.0% |
| 1996 | -3.57x | CA$-1.82 Million | CA$510.76K | — |