Canagold Resources Ltd (CCM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Canagold Resources Ltd (CCM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-208.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$4.45 Million) in one year. Explore investment intensity of Canagold Resources Ltd to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Canagold Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Canagold Resources Ltd across 30 annual periods. Also explore how large is Canagold Resources Ltd's balance sheet for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Canagold Resources Ltd (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Canagold Resources Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Canagold Resources Ltd stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.18x | CA$-817.00K | CA$4.45 Million | ▼ -39.5% |
| 2024 | -0.13x | CA$-364.00K | CA$2.77 Million | ▲ +81.1% |
| 2023 | -0.70x | CA$-1.73 Million | CA$2.49 Million | ▼ -63.1% |
| 2022 | -0.43x | CA$-1.33 Million | CA$3.12 Million | ▲ +38.3% |
| 2021 | -0.69x | CA$-893.00K | CA$1.29 Million | ▲ +74.1% |
| 2020 | -2.67x | CA$-1.41 Million | CA$526.00K | ▼ -29.3% |
| 2019 | -2.07x | CA$-813.00K | CA$393.00K | ▲ +4.1% |
| 2018 | -2.16x | CA$-921.00K | CA$427.00K | ▲ +24.4% |
| 2017 | -2.85x | CA$-1.09 Million | CA$383.00K | ▲ +86.4% |
| 2016 | -21.05x | CA$-2.13 Million | CA$101.00K | ▼ -3962.1% |
| 2015 | -0.52x | CA$-584.00K | CA$1.13 Million | ▲ +65.3% |
| 2014 | -1.49x | CA$-1.36 Million | CA$914.00K | ▼ -243.4% |
| 2013 | -0.43x | CA$-468.00K | CA$1.08 Million | ▲ +60.0% |
| 2012 | -1.09x | CA$-1.01 Million | CA$929.00K | ▲ +11.3% |
| 2011 | -1.23x | CA$-990.00K | CA$807.00K | ▼ -33.7% |
| 2010 | -0.92x | CA$-880.00K | CA$959.00K | ▼ -108.8% |
| 2009 | -0.44x | CA$-439.00K | CA$999.00K | ▲ +77.6% |
| 2008 | -1.96x | CA$-600.00K | CA$306.00K | ▲ +4.6% |
| 2007 | -2.06x | CA$-1.30 Million | CA$634.38K | ▲ +63.9% |
| 2006 | -5.69x | CA$-1.34 Million | CA$235.21K | ▼ -84.3% |
| 2005 | -3.09x | CA$-724.91K | CA$234.76K | ▼ -55.7% |
| 2004 | -1.98x | CA$-775.07K | CA$390.87K | ▼ -171.3% |
| 2003 | -0.73x | CA$-246.86K | CA$337.68K | ▲ +92.4% |
| 2002 | -9.66x | CA$-306.92K | CA$31.77K | ▼ -116.9% |
| 2001 | -4.45x | CA$-481.22K | CA$108.05K | ▼ -276.1% |
| 2000 | -1.18x | CA$-428.72K | CA$362.05K | ▼ -77.6% |
| 1999 | -0.67x | CA$-276.49K | CA$414.74K | ▲ +91.1% |
| 1998 | -7.50x | CA$-969.05K | CA$129.21K | ▼ -34.6% |
| 1997 | -5.57x | CA$-2.73 Million | CA$489.68K | ▼ -56.0% |
| 1996 | -3.57x | CA$-1.82 Million | CA$510.76K | — |