Calfrac Well Services Ltd. (CFW) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Calfrac Well Services Ltd. (CFW) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.20x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$75.44 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$382.92 Million) in one year. Check Calfrac Well Services Ltd. total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Calfrac Well Services Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Calfrac Well Services Ltd. across 30 annual periods. Also explore how large is Calfrac Well Services Ltd.'s balance sheet for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Calfrac Well Services Ltd. (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Calfrac Well Services Ltd.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Calfrac Well Services Ltd. (CFW) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.52x | CA$199.59 Million | CA$382.92 Million | ▲ +138.3% |
| 2024 | 0.22x | CA$127.18 Million | CA$581.51 Million | ▼ -60.4% |
| 2023 | 0.55x | CA$281.63 Million | CA$510.29 Million | ▲ +194.0% |
| 2022 | 0.19x | CA$107.53 Million | CA$572.78 Million | ▲ +790.5% |
| 2021 | -0.03x | CA$-15.34 Million | CA$564.12 Million | ▼ -155.7% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | CA$24.52 Million | CA$502.23 Million | ▼ -57.2% |
| 2019 | 0.11x | CA$132.02 Million | CA$1.16 Billion | ▼ -21.7% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | CA$184.75 Million | CA$1.27 Billion | ▲ +1393.1% |
| 2017 | -0.01x | CA$-13.90 Million | CA$1.23 Billion | ▲ +84.2% |
| 2016 | -0.07x | CA$-79.59 Million | CA$1.12 Billion | ▼ -170.3% |
| 2015 | 0.10x | CA$121.06 Million | CA$1.19 Billion | ▼ -33.5% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | CA$202.47 Million | CA$1.32 Billion | ▲ +24.4% |
| 2013 | 0.12x | CA$132.01 Million | CA$1.07 Billion | ▼ -53.4% |
| 2012 | 0.26x | CA$196.25 Million | CA$744.06 Million | ▼ -23.9% |
| 2011 | 0.35x | CA$244.16 Million | CA$704.55 Million | ▲ +73.8% |
| 2010 | 0.20x | CA$119.22 Million | CA$597.89 Million | ▲ +35.8% |
| 2009 | 0.15x | CA$55.93 Million | CA$380.79 Million | ▼ -12.6% |
| 2008 | 0.17x | CA$50.11 Million | CA$298.25 Million | ▼ -56.0% |
| 2007 | 0.38x | CA$79.48 Million | CA$208.00 Million | ▼ -47.9% |
| 2006 | 0.73x | CA$110.52 Million | CA$150.68 Million | ▲ +21.5% |
| 2005 | 0.60x | CA$62.05 Million | CA$102.79 Million | ▲ +59.0% |
| 2004 | 0.38x | CA$34.40 Million | CA$90.62 Million | ▲ +210.2% |
| 2003 | 0.12x | CA$9.18 Million | CA$75.03 Million | ▼ -9.0% |
| 2002 | 0.13x | CA$11.05 Million | CA$82.25 Million | ▲ +196.1% |
| 2001 | 0.05x | CA$4.22 Million | CA$92.99 Million | ▲ +155.0% |
| 2000 | -0.08x | CA$-7.55 Million | CA$91.59 Million | ▼ -45.8% |
| 1999 | -0.06x | CA$-7.60 Million | CA$134.40 Million | ▼ -463.8% |
| 1998 | 0.02x | CA$2.40 Million | CA$154.40 Million | ▼ -82.0% |
| 1997 | 0.09x | CA$12.90 Million | CA$149.10 Million | ▼ -66.8% |
| 1996 | 0.26x | CA$35.00 Million | CA$134.20 Million | — |