Enerflex Ltd. (EFX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 0.03x

Enerflex Ltd. (EFX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$74.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$2.37 Billion) in one year. See EFX cash flow after capex ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.03x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

CA$74.00 Million
CAD

Total Liabilities

CA$2.37 Billion
CAD

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Enerflex Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2009–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Enerflex Ltd. across 16 annual periods. Also explore EFX net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Enerflex Ltd. (2009–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Enerflex Ltd.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Enerflex Ltd. market capitalisation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (CAD) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.13x CA$324.00 Million CA$2.50 Billion ▲ +19.2%
2023 0.11x CA$273.31 Million CA$2.52 Billion ▲ +1397.2%
2022 0.01x CA$19.77 Million CA$2.73 Billion ▼ -97.3%
2021 0.27x CA$225.16 Million CA$837.69 Million ▼ -4.5%
2020 0.28x CA$220.25 Million CA$782.88 Million ▲ +467.0%
2019 0.05x CA$54.17 Million CA$1.09 Billion ▼ -75.5%
2018 0.20x CA$242.87 Million CA$1.20 Billion ▲ +12.4%
2017 0.18x CA$179.25 Million CA$996.13 Million ▲ +49.8%
2016 0.12x CA$91.79 Million CA$764.32 Million ▲ +21.2%
2015 0.10x CA$104.17 Million CA$1.05 Billion ▲ +72.5%
2014 0.06x CA$64.61 Million CA$1.13 Billion ▼ -59.7%
2013 0.14x CA$69.02 Million CA$484.42 Million ▼ -46.6%
2012 0.27x CA$134.21 Million CA$502.58 Million ▲ +5.8%
2011 0.25x CA$134.79 Million CA$534.30 Million ▲ +4.9%
2010 0.24x CA$255.65 Million CA$1.06 Billion ▼ -37.4%
2009 0.38x CA$196.25 Million CA$510.60 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.