Enghouse Systems Ltd (ENGH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Enghouse Systems Ltd (ENGH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$19.63 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$247.35 Million) in one year. See ENGH FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Enghouse Systems Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Enghouse Systems Ltd across 31 annual periods. Also explore Enghouse Systems Ltd (ENGH) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Enghouse Systems Ltd (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Enghouse Systems Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Enghouse Systems Ltd (ENGH) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.42x | CA$104.63 Million | CA$247.35 Million | ▼ -23.9% |
| 2024 | 0.56x | CA$132.07 Million | CA$237.69 Million | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2023 | 0.50x | CA$115.30 Million | CA$228.34 Million | ▼ -3.7% |
| 2022 | 0.52x | CA$103.18 Million | CA$196.83 Million | ▼ -2.5% |
| 2021 | 0.54x | CA$118.46 Million | CA$220.31 Million | ▼ -14.5% |
| 2020 | 0.63x | CA$168.15 Million | CA$267.32 Million | ▲ +45.7% |
| 2019 | 0.43x | CA$81.38 Million | CA$188.53 Million | ▼ -36.3% |
| 2018 | 0.68x | CA$98.25 Million | CA$145.08 Million | ▲ +26.5% |
| 2017 | 0.54x | CA$83.24 Million | CA$155.44 Million | ▲ +35.1% |
| 2016 | 0.40x | CA$59.73 Million | CA$150.65 Million | ▲ +4.2% |
| 2015 | 0.38x | CA$50.49 Million | CA$132.66 Million | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2014 | 0.40x | CA$47.64 Million | CA$119.52 Million | ▲ +17.4% |
| 2013 | 0.34x | CA$32.36 Million | CA$95.33 Million | ▲ +18.2% |
| 2012 | 0.29x | CA$23.48 Million | CA$81.77 Million | ▼ -50.3% |
| 2011 | 0.58x | CA$41.05 Million | CA$71.01 Million | ▲ +89.4% |
| 2010 | 0.31x | CA$18.63 Million | CA$61.05 Million | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2009 | 0.35x | CA$15.85 Million | CA$45.02 Million | ▲ +93.3% |
| 2008 | 0.18x | CA$9.22 Million | CA$50.62 Million | ▼ -45.5% |
| 2007 | 0.33x | CA$12.96 Million | CA$38.75 Million | ▼ -21.4% |
| 2006 | 0.43x | CA$19.89 Million | CA$46.75 Million | ▲ +65.5% |
| 2005 | 0.26x | CA$8.38 Million | CA$32.63 Million | ▼ -23.8% |
| 2004 | 0.34x | CA$11.96 Million | CA$35.48 Million | ▼ -14.8% |
| 2003 | 0.40x | CA$11.87 Million | CA$30.01 Million | ▼ -43.5% |
| 2002 | 0.70x | CA$5.81 Million | CA$8.30 Million | ▼ -26.5% |
| 2001 | 0.95x | CA$7.61 Million | CA$7.98 Million | ▼ -33.6% |
| 2000 | 1.44x | CA$13.26 Million | CA$9.23 Million | ▲ +41.2% |
| 1999 | 1.02x | CA$5.61 Million | CA$5.51 Million | ▼ -19.1% |
| 1998 | 1.26x | CA$10.68 Million | CA$8.49 Million | ▼ -13.9% |
| 1997 | 1.46x | CA$9.80 Million | CA$6.70 Million | ▲ +261.3% |
| 1996 | -0.91x | CA$-3.91 Million | CA$4.31 Million | ▼ -20.9% |
| 1995 | -0.75x | CA$-3.01 Million | CA$4.02 Million | — |