Enghouse Systems Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Enghouse Systems Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Enghouse Systems Ltd (ENGH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$19.63 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$247.35 Million) in one year. Check Enghouse Systems Ltd (ENGH) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Enghouse Systems Ltd (1995–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Enghouse Systems Ltd from 1995 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Enghouse Systems Ltd across 31 annual periods. Check ENGH total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Enghouse Systems Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2025)
Enghouse Systems Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Enghouse Systems Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see ENGH operating cash flow.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.42x | CA$104.63 Million | CA$247.35 Million | ▼ -23.9% |
| 2024 | 0.56x | CA$132.07 Million | CA$237.69 Million | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2023 | 0.50x | CA$115.30 Million | CA$228.34 Million | ▼ -3.7% |
| 2022 | 0.52x | CA$103.18 Million | CA$196.83 Million | ▼ -2.5% |
| 2021 | 0.54x | CA$118.46 Million | CA$220.31 Million | ▼ -14.5% |
| 2020 | 0.63x | CA$168.15 Million | CA$267.32 Million | ▲ +45.7% |
| 2019 | 0.43x | CA$81.38 Million | CA$188.53 Million | ▼ -36.3% |
| 2018 | 0.68x | CA$98.25 Million | CA$145.08 Million | ▲ +26.5% |
| 2017 | 0.54x | CA$83.24 Million | CA$155.44 Million | ▲ +35.1% |
| 2016 | 0.40x | CA$59.73 Million | CA$150.65 Million | ▲ +4.2% |
| 2015 | 0.38x | CA$50.49 Million | CA$132.66 Million | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2014 | 0.40x | CA$47.64 Million | CA$119.52 Million | ▲ +17.4% |
| 2013 | 0.34x | CA$32.36 Million | CA$95.33 Million | ▲ +18.2% |
| 2012 | 0.29x | CA$23.48 Million | CA$81.77 Million | ▼ -50.3% |
| 2011 | 0.58x | CA$41.05 Million | CA$71.01 Million | ▲ +89.4% |
| 2010 | 0.31x | CA$18.63 Million | CA$61.05 Million | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2009 | 0.35x | CA$15.85 Million | CA$45.02 Million | ▲ +93.3% |
| 2008 | 0.18x | CA$9.22 Million | CA$50.62 Million | ▼ -45.5% |
| 2007 | 0.33x | CA$12.96 Million | CA$38.75 Million | ▼ -21.4% |
| 2006 | 0.43x | CA$19.89 Million | CA$46.75 Million | ▲ +65.5% |
| 2005 | 0.26x | CA$8.38 Million | CA$32.63 Million | ▼ -23.8% |
| 2004 | 0.34x | CA$11.96 Million | CA$35.48 Million | ▼ -14.8% |
| 2003 | 0.40x | CA$11.87 Million | CA$30.01 Million | ▼ -43.5% |
| 2002 | 0.70x | CA$5.81 Million | CA$8.30 Million | ▼ -26.5% |
| 2001 | 0.95x | CA$7.61 Million | CA$7.98 Million | ▼ -33.6% |
| 2000 | 1.44x | CA$13.26 Million | CA$9.23 Million | ▲ +41.2% |
| 1999 | 1.02x | CA$5.61 Million | CA$5.51 Million | ▼ -19.1% |
| 1998 | 1.26x | CA$10.68 Million | CA$8.49 Million | ▼ -13.9% |
| 1997 | 1.46x | CA$9.80 Million | CA$6.70 Million | ▲ +261.3% |
| 1996 | -0.91x | CA$-3.91 Million | CA$4.31 Million | ▼ -20.9% |
| 1995 | -0.75x | CA$-3.01 Million | CA$4.02 Million | — |