Enghouse Systems Ltd (ENGH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Enghouse Systems Ltd (ENGH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$19.63 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$247.35 Million) in one year. Check ENGH total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Enghouse Systems Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Enghouse Systems Ltd across 31 annual periods. Also explore Enghouse Systems Ltd asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Enghouse Systems Ltd (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Enghouse Systems Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Enghouse Systems Ltd.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.42x | CA$104.63 Million | CA$247.35 Million | ▼ -23.9% |
| 2024 | 0.56x | CA$132.07 Million | CA$237.69 Million | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2023 | 0.50x | CA$115.30 Million | CA$228.34 Million | ▼ -3.7% |
| 2022 | 0.52x | CA$103.18 Million | CA$196.83 Million | ▼ -2.5% |
| 2021 | 0.54x | CA$118.46 Million | CA$220.31 Million | ▼ -14.5% |
| 2020 | 0.63x | CA$168.15 Million | CA$267.32 Million | ▲ +45.7% |
| 2019 | 0.43x | CA$81.38 Million | CA$188.53 Million | ▼ -36.3% |
| 2018 | 0.68x | CA$98.25 Million | CA$145.08 Million | ▲ +26.5% |
| 2017 | 0.54x | CA$83.24 Million | CA$155.44 Million | ▲ +35.1% |
| 2016 | 0.40x | CA$59.73 Million | CA$150.65 Million | ▲ +4.2% |
| 2015 | 0.38x | CA$50.49 Million | CA$132.66 Million | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2014 | 0.40x | CA$47.64 Million | CA$119.52 Million | ▲ +17.4% |
| 2013 | 0.34x | CA$32.36 Million | CA$95.33 Million | ▲ +18.2% |
| 2012 | 0.29x | CA$23.48 Million | CA$81.77 Million | ▼ -50.3% |
| 2011 | 0.58x | CA$41.05 Million | CA$71.01 Million | ▲ +89.4% |
| 2010 | 0.31x | CA$18.63 Million | CA$61.05 Million | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2009 | 0.35x | CA$15.85 Million | CA$45.02 Million | ▲ +93.3% |
| 2008 | 0.18x | CA$9.22 Million | CA$50.62 Million | ▼ -45.5% |
| 2007 | 0.33x | CA$12.96 Million | CA$38.75 Million | ▼ -21.4% |
| 2006 | 0.43x | CA$19.89 Million | CA$46.75 Million | ▲ +65.5% |
| 2005 | 0.26x | CA$8.38 Million | CA$32.63 Million | ▼ -23.8% |
| 2004 | 0.34x | CA$11.96 Million | CA$35.48 Million | ▼ -14.8% |
| 2003 | 0.40x | CA$11.87 Million | CA$30.01 Million | ▼ -43.5% |
| 2002 | 0.70x | CA$5.81 Million | CA$8.30 Million | ▼ -26.5% |
| 2001 | 0.95x | CA$7.61 Million | CA$7.98 Million | ▼ -33.6% |
| 2000 | 1.44x | CA$13.26 Million | CA$9.23 Million | ▲ +41.2% |
| 1999 | 1.02x | CA$5.61 Million | CA$5.51 Million | ▼ -19.1% |
| 1998 | 1.26x | CA$10.68 Million | CA$8.49 Million | ▼ -13.9% |
| 1997 | 1.46x | CA$9.80 Million | CA$6.70 Million | ▲ +261.3% |
| 1996 | -0.91x | CA$-3.91 Million | CA$4.31 Million | ▼ -20.9% |
| 1995 | -0.75x | CA$-3.01 Million | CA$4.02 Million | — |