Ensign Energy Services Inc (ESI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Ensign Energy Services Inc (ESI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$33.07 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.39 Billion) in one year. See ESI financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Ensign Energy Services Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Ensign Energy Services Inc across 33 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see ESI cash flow metrics.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Ensign Energy Services Inc (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Ensign Energy Services Inc. Check Ensign Energy Services Inc (ESI) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.19x | CA$251.98 Million | CA$1.36 Billion | ▼ -39.5% |
| 2024 | 0.31x | CA$471.79 Million | CA$1.54 Billion | ▲ +39.3% |
| 2023 | 0.22x | CA$360.30 Million | CA$1.64 Billion | ▲ +30.2% |
| 2022 | 0.17x | CA$319.96 Million | CA$1.90 Billion | ▲ +68.6% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | CA$178.64 Million | CA$1.78 Billion | ▼ -31.5% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | CA$246.97 Million | CA$1.69 Billion | ▲ +8.9% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | CA$269.57 Million | CA$2.01 Billion | ▲ +85.7% |
| 2018 | 0.07x | CA$152.13 Million | CA$2.10 Billion | ▼ -32.1% |
| 2017 | 0.11x | CA$135.15 Million | CA$1.27 Billion | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2016 | 0.12x | CA$165.34 Million | CA$1.38 Billion | ▼ -56.1% |
| 2015 | 0.27x | CA$412.24 Million | CA$1.51 Billion | ▼ -12.2% |
| 2014 | 0.31x | CA$521.13 Million | CA$1.68 Billion | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2013 | 0.32x | CA$452.64 Million | CA$1.43 Billion | ▼ -26.7% |
| 2012 | 0.43x | CA$525.55 Million | CA$1.21 Billion | ▲ +54.9% |
| 2011 | 0.28x | CA$370.49 Million | CA$1.32 Billion | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2010 | 0.40x | CA$269.25 Million | CA$673.38 Million | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2009 | 0.48x | CA$286.24 Million | CA$597.29 Million | ▼ -1.9% |
| 2008 | 0.49x | CA$331.03 Million | CA$677.68 Million | ▼ -14.3% |
| 2007 | 0.57x | CA$309.15 Million | CA$542.35 Million | ▼ -5.6% |
| 2006 | 0.60x | CA$395.16 Million | CA$654.54 Million | ▲ +52.7% |
| 2005 | 0.40x | CA$296.73 Million | CA$750.44 Million | ▲ +9.9% |
| 2004 | 0.36x | CA$176.18 Million | CA$489.50 Million | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2003 | 0.32x | CA$146.63 Million | CA$464.63 Million | ▲ +38.6% |
| 2002 | 0.23x | CA$89.31 Million | CA$392.33 Million | ▼ -64.7% |
| 2001 | 0.64x | CA$136.01 Million | CA$210.97 Million | ▲ +98.8% |
| 2000 | 0.32x | CA$86.91 Million | CA$267.97 Million | ▲ +10.8% |
| 1999 | 0.29x | CA$68.10 Million | CA$232.70 Million | ▼ -42.6% |
| 1998 | 0.51x | CA$78.70 Million | CA$154.40 Million | ▲ +38.9% |
| 1997 | 0.37x | CA$69.00 Million | CA$188.00 Million | ▲ +17.1% |
| 1996 | 0.31x | CA$47.10 Million | CA$150.30 Million | ▲ +64.0% |
| 1995 | 0.19x | CA$9.40 Million | CA$49.20 Million | ▼ -51.8% |
| 1994 | 0.40x | CA$26.50 Million | CA$66.90 Million | ▲ +30.3% |
| 1993 | 0.30x | CA$12.40 Million | CA$40.80 Million | — |