Ensign Energy Services Inc (ESI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Ensign Energy Services Inc (ESI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$33.07 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.39 Billion) in one year. See ESI free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Ensign Energy Services Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Ensign Energy Services Inc across 33 annual periods. Also explore ESI year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Ensign Energy Services Inc (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Ensign Energy Services Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see ESI company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.19x | CA$251.98 Million | CA$1.36 Billion | ▼ -39.5% |
| 2024 | 0.31x | CA$471.79 Million | CA$1.54 Billion | ▲ +39.3% |
| 2023 | 0.22x | CA$360.30 Million | CA$1.64 Billion | ▲ +30.2% |
| 2022 | 0.17x | CA$319.96 Million | CA$1.90 Billion | ▲ +68.6% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | CA$178.64 Million | CA$1.78 Billion | ▼ -31.5% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | CA$246.97 Million | CA$1.69 Billion | ▲ +8.9% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | CA$269.57 Million | CA$2.01 Billion | ▲ +85.7% |
| 2018 | 0.07x | CA$152.13 Million | CA$2.10 Billion | ▼ -32.1% |
| 2017 | 0.11x | CA$135.15 Million | CA$1.27 Billion | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2016 | 0.12x | CA$165.34 Million | CA$1.38 Billion | ▼ -56.1% |
| 2015 | 0.27x | CA$412.24 Million | CA$1.51 Billion | ▼ -12.2% |
| 2014 | 0.31x | CA$521.13 Million | CA$1.68 Billion | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2013 | 0.32x | CA$452.64 Million | CA$1.43 Billion | ▼ -26.7% |
| 2012 | 0.43x | CA$525.55 Million | CA$1.21 Billion | ▲ +54.9% |
| 2011 | 0.28x | CA$370.49 Million | CA$1.32 Billion | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2010 | 0.40x | CA$269.25 Million | CA$673.38 Million | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2009 | 0.48x | CA$286.24 Million | CA$597.29 Million | ▼ -1.9% |
| 2008 | 0.49x | CA$331.03 Million | CA$677.68 Million | ▼ -14.3% |
| 2007 | 0.57x | CA$309.15 Million | CA$542.35 Million | ▼ -5.6% |
| 2006 | 0.60x | CA$395.16 Million | CA$654.54 Million | ▲ +52.7% |
| 2005 | 0.40x | CA$296.73 Million | CA$750.44 Million | ▲ +9.9% |
| 2004 | 0.36x | CA$176.18 Million | CA$489.50 Million | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2003 | 0.32x | CA$146.63 Million | CA$464.63 Million | ▲ +38.6% |
| 2002 | 0.23x | CA$89.31 Million | CA$392.33 Million | ▼ -64.7% |
| 2001 | 0.64x | CA$136.01 Million | CA$210.97 Million | ▲ +98.8% |
| 2000 | 0.32x | CA$86.91 Million | CA$267.97 Million | ▲ +10.8% |
| 1999 | 0.29x | CA$68.10 Million | CA$232.70 Million | ▼ -42.6% |
| 1998 | 0.51x | CA$78.70 Million | CA$154.40 Million | ▲ +38.9% |
| 1997 | 0.37x | CA$69.00 Million | CA$188.00 Million | ▲ +17.1% |
| 1996 | 0.31x | CA$47.10 Million | CA$150.30 Million | ▲ +64.0% |
| 1995 | 0.19x | CA$9.40 Million | CA$49.20 Million | ▼ -51.8% |
| 1994 | 0.40x | CA$26.50 Million | CA$66.90 Million | ▲ +30.3% |
| 1993 | 0.30x | CA$12.40 Million | CA$40.80 Million | — |