Ensign Energy Services Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Ensign Energy Services Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Ensign Energy Services Inc (ESI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$86.58 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.39 Billion) in one year. Check Ensign Energy Services Inc (ESI) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Ensign Energy Services Inc (1993–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Ensign Energy Services Inc from 1993 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Ensign Energy Services Inc across 33 annual periods. Check ESI cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Ensign Energy Services Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1993–2025)
Ensign Energy Services Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1993 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Ensign Energy Services Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Ensign Energy Services Inc (ESI) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.19x | CA$251.98 Million | CA$1.36 Billion | ▼ -39.5% |
| 2024 | 0.31x | CA$471.79 Million | CA$1.54 Billion | ▲ +39.3% |
| 2023 | 0.22x | CA$360.30 Million | CA$1.64 Billion | ▲ +30.2% |
| 2022 | 0.17x | CA$319.96 Million | CA$1.90 Billion | ▲ +68.6% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | CA$178.64 Million | CA$1.78 Billion | ▼ -31.5% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | CA$246.97 Million | CA$1.69 Billion | ▲ +8.9% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | CA$269.57 Million | CA$2.01 Billion | ▲ +85.7% |
| 2018 | 0.07x | CA$152.13 Million | CA$2.10 Billion | ▼ -32.1% |
| 2017 | 0.11x | CA$135.15 Million | CA$1.27 Billion | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2016 | 0.12x | CA$165.34 Million | CA$1.38 Billion | ▼ -56.1% |
| 2015 | 0.27x | CA$412.24 Million | CA$1.51 Billion | ▼ -12.2% |
| 2014 | 0.31x | CA$521.13 Million | CA$1.68 Billion | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2013 | 0.32x | CA$452.64 Million | CA$1.43 Billion | ▼ -26.7% |
| 2012 | 0.43x | CA$525.55 Million | CA$1.21 Billion | ▲ +54.9% |
| 2011 | 0.28x | CA$370.49 Million | CA$1.32 Billion | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2010 | 0.40x | CA$269.25 Million | CA$673.38 Million | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2009 | 0.48x | CA$286.24 Million | CA$597.29 Million | ▼ -1.9% |
| 2008 | 0.49x | CA$331.03 Million | CA$677.68 Million | ▼ -14.3% |
| 2007 | 0.57x | CA$309.15 Million | CA$542.35 Million | ▼ -5.6% |
| 2006 | 0.60x | CA$395.16 Million | CA$654.54 Million | ▲ +52.7% |
| 2005 | 0.40x | CA$296.73 Million | CA$750.44 Million | ▲ +9.9% |
| 2004 | 0.36x | CA$176.18 Million | CA$489.50 Million | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2003 | 0.32x | CA$146.63 Million | CA$464.63 Million | ▲ +38.6% |
| 2002 | 0.23x | CA$89.31 Million | CA$392.33 Million | ▼ -64.7% |
| 2001 | 0.64x | CA$136.01 Million | CA$210.97 Million | ▲ +98.8% |
| 2000 | 0.32x | CA$86.91 Million | CA$267.97 Million | ▲ +10.8% |
| 1999 | 0.29x | CA$68.10 Million | CA$232.70 Million | ▼ -42.6% |
| 1998 | 0.51x | CA$78.70 Million | CA$154.40 Million | ▲ +38.9% |
| 1997 | 0.37x | CA$69.00 Million | CA$188.00 Million | ▲ +17.1% |
| 1996 | 0.31x | CA$47.10 Million | CA$150.30 Million | ▲ +64.0% |
| 1995 | 0.19x | CA$9.40 Million | CA$49.20 Million | ▼ -51.8% |
| 1994 | 0.40x | CA$26.50 Million | CA$66.90 Million | ▲ +30.3% |
| 1993 | 0.30x | CA$12.40 Million | CA$40.80 Million | — |