Fortune Minerals Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Fortune Minerals Limited cash flow-to-debt ratio. Fortune Minerals Limited (FT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-755.67K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$15.13 Million) in one year. Check Fortune Minerals Limited (FT) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Fortune Minerals Limited (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Fortune Minerals Limited from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Fortune Minerals Limited across 30 annual periods. Check Fortune Minerals Limited (FT) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Fortune Minerals Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
Fortune Minerals Limited cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Fortune Minerals Limited. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Fortune Minerals Limited operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.15x | CA$-2.97 Million | CA$20.32 Million | ▼ -1168.6% |
| 2024 | -0.01x | CA$-186.52K | CA$16.22 Million | ▲ +90.5% |
| 2023 | -0.12x | CA$-1.21 Million | CA$10.02 Million | ▲ +13.7% |
| 2022 | -0.14x | CA$-1.20 Million | CA$8.57 Million | ▼ -153.9% |
| 2021 | -0.06x | CA$-814.59K | CA$14.75 Million | ▼ -18.2% |
| 2020 | -0.05x | CA$-568.22K | CA$12.16 Million | ▲ +73.2% |
| 2019 | -0.17x | CA$-1.92 Million | CA$11.05 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2018 | -0.16x | CA$-1.80 Million | CA$11.09 Million | ▼ -139.9% |
| 2017 | -0.07x | CA$-1.48 Million | CA$21.85 Million | ▲ +42.1% |
| 2016 | -0.12x | CA$-1.34 Million | CA$11.43 Million | ▲ +91.7% |
| 2015 | -1.41x | CA$-6.95 Million | CA$4.94 Million | ▼ -2069.8% |
| 2014 | -0.06x | CA$-5.03 Million | CA$77.58 Million | ▲ +49.7% |
| 2013 | -0.13x | CA$-2.65 Million | CA$20.53 Million | ▼ -5.1% |
| 2012 | -0.12x | CA$-2.87 Million | CA$23.40 Million | ▼ -61.2% |
| 2011 | -0.08x | CA$-1.91 Million | CA$25.03 Million | ▲ +79.0% |
| 2010 | -0.36x | CA$-4.13 Million | CA$11.37 Million | ▼ -574.3% |
| 2009 | -0.05x | CA$-778.66K | CA$14.44 Million | ▼ -172.8% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | CA$825.61K | CA$11.15 Million | ▼ -19.6% |
| 2007 | 0.09x | CA$756.45K | CA$8.22 Million | ▲ +1007.7% |
| 2006 | -0.01x | CA$-84.61K | CA$8.34 Million | ▲ +86.9% |
| 2005 | -0.08x | CA$-434.10K | CA$5.60 Million | ▼ -43.3% |
| 2004 | -0.05x | CA$-257.62K | CA$4.76 Million | ▲ +27.9% |
| 2003 | -0.08x | CA$-212.88K | CA$2.83 Million | ▲ +18.9% |
| 2002 | -0.09x | CA$-232.20K | CA$2.51 Million | ▼ -304.7% |
| 2001 | 0.05x | CA$112.51K | CA$2.49 Million | ▲ +178.6% |
| 2000 | -0.06x | CA$-152.46K | CA$2.65 Million | ▲ +92.3% |
| 1999 | -0.75x | CA$-300.00K | CA$400.00K | ▼ -175.0% |
| 1998 | 1.00x | CA$100.00K | CA$100.00K | ▲ +200.0% |
| 1997 | -1.00x | CA$-200.00K | CA$200.00K | ▼ -150.0% |
| 1996 | 2.00x | CA$200.00K | CA$100.00K | — |