Fortune Minerals Limited (FT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Fortune Minerals Limited (FT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.06x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.13 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$17.76 Million) in one year. See Fortune Minerals Limited free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Fortune Minerals Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Fortune Minerals Limited across 29 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Fortune Minerals Limited to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Fortune Minerals Limited (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Fortune Minerals Limited. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Fortune Minerals Limited.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.01x | CA$-186.52K | CA$16.22 Million | ▲ +90.5% |
| 2023 | -0.12x | CA$-1.21 Million | CA$10.02 Million | ▲ +13.7% |
| 2022 | -0.14x | CA$-1.20 Million | CA$8.57 Million | ▼ -153.9% |
| 2021 | -0.06x | CA$-814.59K | CA$14.75 Million | ▼ -18.2% |
| 2020 | -0.05x | CA$-568.22K | CA$12.16 Million | ▲ +73.2% |
| 2019 | -0.17x | CA$-1.92 Million | CA$11.05 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2018 | -0.16x | CA$-1.80 Million | CA$11.09 Million | ▼ -139.9% |
| 2017 | -0.07x | CA$-1.48 Million | CA$21.85 Million | ▲ +42.1% |
| 2016 | -0.12x | CA$-1.34 Million | CA$11.43 Million | ▲ +91.7% |
| 2015 | -1.41x | CA$-6.95 Million | CA$4.94 Million | ▼ -2069.8% |
| 2014 | -0.06x | CA$-5.03 Million | CA$77.58 Million | ▲ +49.7% |
| 2013 | -0.13x | CA$-2.65 Million | CA$20.53 Million | ▼ -5.1% |
| 2012 | -0.12x | CA$-2.87 Million | CA$23.40 Million | ▼ -61.2% |
| 2011 | -0.08x | CA$-1.91 Million | CA$25.03 Million | ▲ +79.0% |
| 2010 | -0.36x | CA$-4.13 Million | CA$11.37 Million | ▼ -574.3% |
| 2009 | -0.05x | CA$-778.66K | CA$14.44 Million | ▼ -172.8% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | CA$825.61K | CA$11.15 Million | ▼ -19.6% |
| 2007 | 0.09x | CA$756.45K | CA$8.22 Million | ▲ +1007.7% |
| 2006 | -0.01x | CA$-84.61K | CA$8.34 Million | ▲ +86.9% |
| 2005 | -0.08x | CA$-434.10K | CA$5.60 Million | ▼ -43.3% |
| 2004 | -0.05x | CA$-257.62K | CA$4.76 Million | ▲ +27.9% |
| 2003 | -0.08x | CA$-212.88K | CA$2.83 Million | ▲ +18.9% |
| 2002 | -0.09x | CA$-232.20K | CA$2.51 Million | ▼ -304.7% |
| 2001 | 0.05x | CA$112.51K | CA$2.49 Million | ▲ +178.6% |
| 2000 | -0.06x | CA$-152.46K | CA$2.65 Million | ▲ +92.3% |
| 1999 | -0.75x | CA$-300.00K | CA$400.00K | ▼ -175.0% |
| 1998 | 1.00x | CA$100.00K | CA$100.00K | ▲ +200.0% |
| 1997 | -1.00x | CA$-200.00K | CA$200.00K | ▼ -150.0% |
| 1996 | 2.00x | CA$200.00K | CA$100.00K | — |